Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Animals have a Plan B: how insects deal with the dual challenge of predators and pathogens

  • Review
  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When animals are faced with a life-threatening challenge, they mount an organism-wide response (i.e. Plan A). For example, both the stress response (i.e. fight-or-flight) and the immune response recruit molecular resources from other body tissues, and induce physiological changes that optimize the body for defense. However, pathogens and predators often co-occur. Animals that can optimize responses for a dual challenge, i.e. simultaneous predator and pathogen attacks, will have a selective advantage. Responses to a combined predator and pathogen attack have not been well studied, but this paper summarizes the existing literature in insects. The response to dual challenges (i.e. Plan B) results in a suite of physiological changes that are different from either the stress response or the immune response, and is not a simple summation of the two. It is also not a straight-forward trade-off of one response against the other. The response to a dual challenge (i.e. Plan B) appears to resolve physiological trade-offs between the stress and immune responses, and reconfigures both responses to provide the best overall defense. However, the dual response appears to be more costly than either response occurring singly, resulting in greater damage from oxidative stress, reduced growth rate, and increased mortality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC, Discovery Grant—RGPIN-2018-04037).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shelley A. Adamo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Ethics approval

The unpublished study on Manduca sexta mentioned in the paper was approved by the University Committee on Laboratory Animals (Dalhousie University, I-11-025) and was in accordance with the Canadian Council of Animal Care.

Additional information

Communicated by Philip Withers.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adamo, S.A. Animals have a Plan B: how insects deal with the dual challenge of predators and pathogens. J Comp Physiol B 190, 381–390 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00360-020-01282-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00360-020-01282-5

Keywords

Navigation