Skip to main content
Log in

Insulin signaling and skeletal muscle atrophy and autophagy in transition dairy cows either overfed energy or fed a controlled energy diet prepartum

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During periods of negative energy balance, mobilization of muscle is a physiologic process providing energy and amino acids. This is important in transition dairy cows experiencing negative energy and protein balance postpartum. Overconsumption of energy during late pregnancy affects resting glucose and insulin concentrations peripartum and increases the risk for hyperketonemia postpartum, but the effects on muscle tissue are not fully understood. Skeletal muscle accounts for the majority of insulin-dependent glucose utilization in ruminants. Our objective was to study peripartal skeletal muscle insulin signaling as well as muscle accretion and atrophy in cows with excess energy consumption prepartum. Skeletal muscle biopsies were obtained 28 and 10 days prepartum, as well as 4 and 21 days postpartum from 24 Holstein cows. Biopsies were taken immediately before and 60 min after intravenous glucose challenge causing endogenous release of insulin. Gene expression of IGF-1, myostatin, and atrogin-1, as well as immunoblot analysis of atrogin-1, muRF1, ubiquitinated proteins, LC3, and phosphorylation of AKT, ERK and mTORC1 substrate 4EBP1 was performed. Excess energy consumption in late pregnancy did not lead to changes in insulin-dependent molecular regulation of muscle accretion or atrophy compared with the controlled energy group. In both groups, phosphorylation of AKT and mTORC1 substrate was significantly decreased postpartum whereas proteasome activity and macroautopagy were upregulated. This study showed that in addition to the proteasome pathway of muscle atrophy, macroautophagy is upregulated in postpartum negative energy and protein balance regardless of dietary energy strategy prepartum and was higher in cows overfed energy throughout the study period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AKT:

Protein kinase B

AUC:

Area under the curve

BHB:

β-Hydroxy-butyrate

DMI:

Dry matter intake

4EBP1:

Translation repressor protein 4E-BP1

EIF3K:

Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3, subunit K

ERK:

Mitogen activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase

IGF-1:

Insulin-like growth factor 1

IVGTT:

Intravenous glucose tolerance test

LC3:

Microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3

MP:

Metabolizable protein

mTORC1:

Mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1

muRF1:

Muscle RING-finger protein-1

PVDF:

Polyvinylidene difluoride

TMR:

Total mixed ration

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Charlene Ryan, Bryant Stuttle (Cornell University, Ithaca, NY) and the staff of the Cornell University Animal Science research facility in Harford, NY. We acknowledge the help of Mélissa Dupléssis (Université Laval, Québec, Canada) with sample collection.

Funding

This study was supported by the Agriculture and Food Research Initiative competitive Grant No. 2012-67015-30230 from the United States Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture (Washington, DC). A. Abuelo was funded by the Pedro Barrié de la Maza Foundation (A Coruña, Spain).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. J. Wakshlag.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they do not have any conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures were approved by the Cornell University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Protocol No. 2011-0016) and were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution at which the studies were conducted.

Additional information

Communicated by G. Heldmaier.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

360_2016_969_MOESM1_ESM.png

Supplementary Fig. 1 Schematic representing the pathways involved in muscle atrophy investigated in this study. Insulin and IGF-1 bind to receptors of the tyrosine kinase type. Signal transduction occurs via insulin receptor substrate (IRS) and leads to increased phosphorylation of AKT downstream. AKT in turn activates mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) independently of amino acids entering the cell. Activation of mTOR is measured by an increase in direct substrates of this kinase such as S6-Kinase (S6 K) and translation repressor protein 4E-BP1 (4EBP1). Activation of mTORC1 in turn suppresses macroautophagy, measured as the increase in the ratio of microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 (LC3)-II to LC3-I. Macroautophagy is a bulk degradation process of cell components in lysosomes. AKT activation inhibits forkhead box protein transcription factor (FOXO) by phosphorylation, excluding it from the nucleus. Activated FOXO (in case of reduced phosphorylation of AKT) enters the nucleus and upregulates transcription of E3-ligases atrogin-1 and MuRF-1. Proteins destined for proteasomal degradation are tagged with free ubiquitin in a series of steps involving E3-ligases. Ubiquitinated proteins are degrades in the 26S proteasome to smaller peptides. Extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) is also activated by signal transduction through the tyrosine kinase receptor following a number of different growth factors, mitogens, hormones, and other mitogenic stimuli. (PNG 176 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mann, S., Abuelo, A., Nydam, D.V. et al. Insulin signaling and skeletal muscle atrophy and autophagy in transition dairy cows either overfed energy or fed a controlled energy diet prepartum. J Comp Physiol B 186, 513–525 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00360-016-0969-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00360-016-0969-1

Keywords

Navigation