Abstract
Flower-visiting bats encounter nectars that vary in both sugar composition and concentration. Because in the new world, the nectars of bat-pollinated flowers tend to be dominated by hexoses, we predicted that at equicaloric concentrations, bats would ingest higher volumes of hexoses than sucrose-containing nectars. We investigated the intake response of three species of Neotropical bats, Leptonycteris curasoae, Glossophaga soricina and Artibeus jamaicensis, to sugar solutions of varying concentrations (292, 438, 584, 730, 876, and 1,022 mmol L−1) consisting of either sucrose or 1:1 mixtures of glucose and fructose solutions. Bats did not show differences in their intake response to sucrose and 1:1 glucose–fructose solutions, indicating that digestion and absorption in bat intestines are designed under the principle of symmorphosis, in which no step is more limiting than the other. Our results also suggest that, on the basis of energy intake, bats should not prefer hexoses over sucrose. We used a mathematical model that uses the rate of sucrose hydrolysis measured in vitro and the small intestinal volume of bats to predict the rate of nectar intake as a function of sugar concentration. The model was a good predictor of the intake responses of L. curasoae and G. soricina, but not of A. jamaicensis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- ΔM :
-
Change in mass
- C sf :
-
Final concentration
- V 0 :
-
Food intake
- C s0 :
-
Initial concentration
- K m :
-
Michaelis–Menten constant
- S max :
-
Rate of hydrolysis
- −r s :
-
Sucrose hydrolysis
- SI:
-
Sugar intake
- τ:
-
Transit time
- G :
-
Volume of small intestine
References
Anderson-Sprecher R (1994) Model comparisons and R 2. Am Stat 48:113–117
Bakken BH, McWorther TJ, Tsahar E, Martínez del Río C (2004). Hummingbirds arrest their kidneys at night: diel variation in glomerular filtration rate in Selasphorus platycercus. J Exp Biol 207:4383–4391
Baker HG, Baker IS (1983) Floral nectar constituents in relation to pollinator type. In: Jones CE, Little RJ (eds) Handbook of pollinators. New York Scientific and Academic, pp 117–141
Baker HG, Baker IS, Hodges A (1998) Sugar composition of nectars and fruits consumed by birds and bats in the tropics and subtropics. Biotropica 30:559–586
Bullock SH (1995) Plant reproduction in neotropical dry forest. In: Bullock SH, Mooney HA, Medina E (eds) Seasonally dry tropical forest. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 277–203
Castle KT, Wunder BA (1995) Limits to food intake and fiber utilization in the prairie vole Microtus orchrogaster: effects of food quality and energy need. J Comp Physiol A 164:609–617
Collins BG (1981) Nectar intake and water balance for two species of Australian honeyeater, Lichmera indistincta and Acanthorynchus superciliosis. Physiol Zool 54:1–13
Cruz-Neto AC, Abe AS (1997) Metabolic rate and thermoregulation in the nectarivorous bat Glossophaga soricina (Chiroptera, Phillostomidae). Rev Brasil Biol 57:203–209
Fleming PA, Bakken BH, Lotz CN, Nicolson SW (2004) Concentration and temperature effects on sugar intake and preferences in a sunbird and Hummingbird. Funct Ecol 18:223–232
García-Oliva F, Camou A, Mass JM (2002) El clima de la región central de la costa del pacífico mexicano. In: Noguera F, Vega SH, García Aldrete AN, Quesada M (eds) Historia natural de chamela. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, pp 3–10
Hansen CB, Jen KC, Kribs P (1981) Regulation of food intake in monkeys. Physiol Behav 26:479–486
Helversen O, Winter Y (2003) Glossophagine bats and their flowers: costs and benefits for plants and pollinators. In: Kunz TH, Fenton MB (eds) Bat ecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 346–397
Hernandez A, Martínez del Río C (1992) Intestinal disaccharidases in five species of phyllostomid bats. J Comp Physiol B 103:105–111
Herrera LG (1999) Preferences for different sugars in Neotropical nectarivorous and frugivorous bats. J Mammal 80:683–688
Herrera LG, Leblanc D, Nassar J (2000) Sugar discrimination and gustatory thresholds in captive-born frugivorous Old World bats. Mammalia 64:135–143
Herrera LG, Martínez del Rio C, Braun E, Hobson K (2001) Renal structure in phyllostomid bats: using stable isotopes to explore relationships between diet and morphology. Isotopes Environ Health Stud 37:1–11
Hiebert SM, Calder WA III (1983) Sodium, potassium, and chloride in floral nectars: energy-free contributions to refractive index and salt balance. Ecology 64:399–402
Inouye DW, Favre ND, Lanum JA, Levine DM, Meyers JB, Roberts MS, Tsao FC, Wang Y-Y (1980) The effects of non-sugar nectar constituents on estimates of nectar energy content. Ecology 61:992–996
JMP 5.1® (2003) SAS institute, Cary, NC, USA
Josens RB, Farina WM, Roces F (1998) Nectar feeding by the ant Camponotus mus: intake rate and crop filling as a function of sucrose concentration. J Insect Physiol 44:579–585
Korine C, Speakman J, Arad Z (2004) Reproductive energetics of captive free-ranging Egyptian fruit bats Rossetus aegymtiacus. Ecology 85:220–230
Levey DJ, Martínez del Rio C (1999) Test, rejection, and reformulation of a chemical reactor-based model of gut function in a fruit-eating bird. Physiol Biochem Zool 72:369–383
López-Calleja MV, Bozinovic F,Martínez del Rio C (1997) Effects of sugar concentration on hummingbird feeding and energy use. Comp Biochem Physiol A 118:1291–1299
Lotz C, Martínez del Rio C (2004) The ability of rufous hummingbirds (Selasphorus rufus) to dilute and concentrate urine. J Avian Biol 35:54–62
Martínez del Rio C, Schondube JE, McWhorter TJ, Herrera LG (2001) Intake responses in nectar feeding birds: digestive and metabolic causes, osmoregulatory consequences, and coevolutionary effects. Am Zool 41:902–915
McWorther TJ, López-Calleja MV (2000) The integration of diet, physiology and ecology of nectar-feeding birds. Rev Chil Hist Nat 73:415–460
McWorther TJ, Martínez del Rio C (2000) Does gut function limit hummingbird food intake? Physiol Biochem Zool 73:313–324
McWorther TJ, Martínez del Rio C, Pinshow B, Roxburg L (2004) Renal function in Palestine Sunbirds: elimination of excess water does not constrain energy intake. J Exp Biol 23:3391–3398
Mirón ML (2005) Efecto de la dieta en el fraccionamiento isotópico de 13C y 15N en el murciélago Glossophaga soricina (Chiroptera: Phillostomidae). Tesis de maestría (Maestría en ciencias biológicas), Facultad de Ciencias, UNAM
Mitchell RJ, Paton DC (1990) Effects of nectar volume and concentration on sugar intake rates of Australian honeyeaters (Meliphagidae). Oecologia 83:238–246
Montgomery MJ, Baumgardt BR (1965) Regulation of food intake in ruminants. 2. Pelleted rations varying in energy concentration. J Dairy Sci 48:569–577
Nicolson SW (2001) Pollination by passerine birds: why are nectars so dilute? Comp Biochem Physiol 4:1–8
Nicolson SW, Fleming PA (2003) Nectar as food for birds: the physiological consequences of drinking dilute sugar solutions. Plant Syst Evol 238:139–153
Ortega J, Castro-Arellano I (2001) Artibeus jamaicensis. Mammal Species 662:1–9
Paton DC, Collins BG (1989) Bills and tongues of nectar-feeding birds: a review of morphology, function and performance, with intercontinental comparisons. Aust J Ecol 14:473–506
Pyke GH, Waser NM (1981) The production of dilute nectars by hummingbird and honeyeater flowers. Biotropica 13:260–270
Ramírez NP, Herrera GM, Mirón L (2005) Physiological constraint to food ingestion in a New World nectarivorous bat. Physiol Biochem Zool 78:1032–1038
Roces F, Winter Y, Helversen O (1993) Nectar concentration preference and water balance in a flower visiting bat, Glossophaga soricina antillarum. In: Barthlott W (eds) Animal–plant interactions in tropical environments. Museum Koening, Bonn, pp 159–165
Rodriguez-Peña N, Stoner K, Schondube J, Ayala-Berdón J, Martínez del Río C (2007) Effects of sugar composition and concentration on food selection by Leptonycteris curasoae and Glossophaga soricina (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae: Glossophaginae). J Mammal (in press)
Schondube JE, Martínez del Río C (2003) Concentration-dependent sugar preferences in nectar-feeding birds: mechanisms and consequences. Funct Ecol 17:445–453
Schondube JE, Herrera LG, Martínez del Río C (2001) Diet and the evolution of digestion and renal function in phyllostomid bats. Zoology 104:59–73
Slansky F, Wheeler GS (1992) Caterpillars compensatory feeding response to diluted nutrients leads to toxic allelochemical dose. Entomol Exp Appl 65:171–186
Spiegel TA (1973) Caloric regulation of food intake in man. J Comp Physiol Psychol 84:24–37
Stuart A, Ord JK (1994) Kendall’s advanced theory of statistics, vol 1. Edward Arnold, New York
Studier EH, Wilson DE (1983) Natural urine concentrations and composition in Neotropical bats. Comp Biochem Physiol 75:509–515
Thomas DW (1984) Fruit intake and energy budgets of frugivorous bats. Physiol Zool 57:457–467
Voight CC, Speakman JR (2007) Nectar-feeding bats fuel their high metabolism directly with exogenous carbohydrates. Funct Ecol 21:913–921
Weibel ER (2000) Symmorphosis: on form and function in shaping life. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Winter Y (1998) In vivo measurement of near maximal rates of nutrient absorption in a mammal. Comp Biochem Physiol 119:853–859
Acknowledgments
The authors’ acknowledge support by grants from PAPIIT-UNAM to KES and JES (IN225103–3). Scholarship support to JA was provided by CONACyT (scholarship 189397). We thank C. I. Garcia Leal, C. Chavez, and D. Salazar for valuable assistance in the field, H. Ferreira, G. Sánchez-Montoya, and A. Valencia Garcia for technical assistance, and the Estación de Biología Chamela for logistical support. Bats were captured with permission from the Oficina de Fauna Silvestre, Mexico, to JES (FAUT-0193).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by G. Heldmaier.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ayala-Berdon, J., Schondube, J.E., Stoner, K.E. et al. The intake responses of three species of leaf-nosed Neotropical bats. J Comp Physiol B 178, 477–485 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00360-007-0240-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00360-007-0240-x