Skip to main content
Log in

Ligand binding to six recombinant pheromone-binding proteins of Antheraea polyphemus and Antheraea pernyi

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Binding properties of six heterologously expressed pheromone-binding proteins (PBPs) identified in the silkmoths Antheraea polyphemus and Antheraea pernyi were studied using tritium-labelled pheromone components, (E,Z)-6,11-hexadecadienyl acetate (3H-Ac1) and (E,Z)-6,11-hexadecadienal (3H-Ald), common to both species. In addition, a known ligand of PBP and inhibitor of pheromone receptor cells, the tritium-labelled esterase inhibitor decyl-thio-1,1,1-trifluoropropanone (3H-DTFP), was tested. The binding of ligands was measured after native gel electrophoresis and cutting gel slices. In both species, PBP1 and PBP3 showed binding of 3H-Ac1. In competition experiments with 3H-Ac1 and the third unlabelled pheromone component, (E,Z)-4,9-tetradecadienyl acetate (Ac2), the PBP1 showed preferential binding of Ac1, whereas PBP3 preferentially bound Ac2. The PBP2 of both species bound 3H-Ald only. All of the six PBPs strongly bound 3H-DTFP. Among unlabelled pheromone derivatives, alcohols were revealed to be the best competitors for 3H-Ac1 and 3H-Ald bound to PBPs. No pH influence was found for 3H-Ac1 binding to, or its release from, the PBP3 of A. polyphemus and A. pernyi between pH 4.0 and pH 7.5. The data indicate binding preference of each of the three PBP-subtypes (1–3) for a specific pheromone component and support the idea that PBPs contribute to odour discrimination, although to a smaller extent than receptor activation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

Ac1 :

(E,Z)-6,11-hexadecadienyl acetate

Ac2 :

(E,Z)-4,9-tetradecadienyl acetate

Ald :

(E,Z)-6,11-hexadecadienal

AMA :

1-amino-anthracene

cpm :

counts per min

DTFP :

decyl-thio-1,1,1-trifluoropropanone

ES-MS :

electrospray mass spectrometry

OH:

(E,Z)-6,11-hexadecadienol

PAGE :

polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

PCR :

polymerase chain reaction

PBP :

pheromone-binding protein

SDS :

sodium dodecyl sulphate

Z-11 OH :

Z-11 hexadecenol

References

  • Bette S, Breer H, Krieger J (2002) Probing a pheromone binding protein of the silkmoth Antheraea polyphemus by endogenous tryptophan fluorescence. Insect Biochem Molec Biol 32:241–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Campanacci V, Krieger J, Bette S, Sturgis JN, Lartigue A, Cambillau C, Breer H, Tegoni M (2001) Revisiting the specificity of Mamestra brassicae and Antheraea polyphemus pheromone-binding proteins with a fluorescence binding assay. J Biol Chem 276:20078–20084

    Google Scholar 

  • Damberger F, Nikonova L, Horst R, Peng GH, Leal WS, Wüthrich K (2000) NMR characterization of a pH-dependent equilibrium between two folded solution conformations of the pheromone-binding protein from Bombyx mori. Protein Sci 9:1038–1041

    Google Scholar 

  • De Kramer JJ, Hemberger J (1987) The neurobiology of pheromone reception. In: Prestwich GD, Blomquist GJ (eds) Pheromone biochemistry. Academic Press, New York, pp 433–472

  • Du G, Prestwich GD (1995) Protein structure encodes the ligand binding specificity in pheromone binding proteins. Biochemistry 34:8726–8732

    Google Scholar 

  • Györgyi TK, Roby-Shemkovitz AJ, Lerner MR (1988) Characterization and cDNA cloning of the pheromone-binding protein from the tobacco hornworm, Manduca sexta: a tissue specific developmentally regulated protein. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 85:9851–9855

    Google Scholar 

  • Horst R, Damberger F, Luginbühl P, Güntert P, Peng G, Nikonova L, Leal WS, Wüthrich K (2001) NMR structure reveals intramolecular regulation mechanism for pheromone binding and release. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:14374–14379

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaissling K-E (2001) Olfactory perireceptor and receptor events in moths: a kinetic model. Chem Senses 26:125–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaissling K-E, Klein U, De Kramer JJ, Keil TA, Kanaujia S, Hemberger J (1985) Insect olfactory cells: electrophysiological and biochemical studies. In: Changeux JP, Hucho F, Maelicke A, Neuman E (eds) Molecular basis of nerve activity. De Gruyter, Berlin, pp 173–183

  • Kowcun A, Honson N, Plettner E (2001) Olfaction in the gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar: effect of pH, ionic strength, and reductants on pheromone transport by pheromone-binding proteins. J Biol Chem 276:44770–44776

    Google Scholar 

  • Krieger J, Raming K, Breer H (1991) Cloning of genomic and complementary DNA encoding insect pheromone-binding proteins: evidence for microdiversity. Biochim Biophys Acta 1088:277–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Krieger J, Gaenssle H, Raming K, Breer H (1993) Odorant binding proteins of Heliothis virescens. Insect Biochem Molec Biol 23:449–456

    Google Scholar 

  • Krieger J, Nickisch-Roseneck EV von, Mameli M, Pelosi P, Breer H (1996) Binding proteins from the antennae of Bombyx mori. Insect Biochem Molec Biol 26:297–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Laemmli UK (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 277:680–685

    Google Scholar 

  • Leal WS (2000) Duality monomer-dimer of the pheromone-binding protein from Bombyx mori. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 268:521–529

    Google Scholar 

  • Leal WS (2003) Proteins that make sense. In: Blomquist G, Vogt RG (eds) Insect pheromones: biochemistry and molecular biology. Academic Press, London

  • Lee D, Damberger FF, Peng G, Horst R, Güntert P, Nikonova L, Leal WS, Wüthrich K (2002) NMR structure of the unliganded Bombyx mori pheromone-binding protein at physiological pH. FEBS Lett 531:314–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Maibeche-Coisne M, Sobrio F, Delaunay T, Lettere M, Dubroca J, Jacquin-Joly E, Nagnan-LeMeillour P (1997) Pheromone binding proteins in the moth Mamestra brassicae: specificity of ligand binding. Insect Biochem Molec Biol 27 213–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Maibeche-Coisne M, Jacquin-Joly E, Francois MC, Nagnan-LeMeillour P (1998) Molecular cloning of two pheromone-binding proteins in the cabbage armyworm Mamestra brassicae. Insect Biochem Molec Biol 28:815–818

    Google Scholar 

  • Maida R, Krieger J, Gebauer T, Lange U, Ziegelberger G (2000) Three pheromone-binding proteins in olfactory sensilla of the two silkmoth species Antheraea polyphemus and Antheraea pernyi. Eur J Biochem 267:2899–2908

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng LZ, Wu CH, Wicklein M, Kaissling KE, Bestmann HJ (1989) Number and sensitivity of three types of receptor cells in Antheraea pernyi and A. polyphemus. J Comp Physiol A 165:139–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Merritt TJ, LaForest S, Prestwich GD, Quattro JM, Vogt RG (1998) Patterns of gene duplication in lepidopteran pheromome-binding proteins. J Mol Evol 46:272–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohl C, Breer H, Krieger J (2002) Species-specific pheromonal compounds induce distinct conformational changes of pheromone binding protein subtypes from Antheraea polyphemus. Invertebrate Neurosci 4:165–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldham NJ, Krieger J, Breer H, Fischedick A, Hoskovec M, Svatos A (2000) Analysis of the silkworm moth pheromone binding protein-pheromone complex by electrospray-ionization-mass spectrometry. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 39:4341–4343

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldham NJ, Krieger J, Breer H, Svatos A (2001) Detection and removal of an artefact fatty acid from the binding site of recombinant Bombyx mori pheromone-binding protein. Chem Senses 26: 529–531

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelosi P (1998) Odorant-binding proteins: structural aspects. In: Murphy C (ed) Olfaction and taste XII. Ann NY Acad Sci 855:281–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Plettner E, Lazar J, Prestwich EG, Prestwich GD (2000) Discrimination of pheromone enantiomers by two pheromone binding proteins from the gypsy moth Lymantria dispar. Biochemistry 39:8953–8962

    Google Scholar 

  • Pophof B (2002) Moth pheromone binding proteins contribute to the excitation of olfactory receptor cells. Naturwissenschaften 89:515–518

    Google Scholar 

  • Pophof B, Gebauer T, Ziegelberger G (2000) Decyl-thio-trifluoropropanone, a competitive inhibitor of moth pheromone receptors. J Comp Physiol A 186:315–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Prestwich GD, Du G, LaForest S (1995) How is pheromone specificity encoded in proteins? Chem Senses 20:461–469

    Google Scholar 

  • Raming K, Krieger J, Breer H (1989) Molecular cloning of an insect pheromone-binding protein. FEBS Lett 256:2215–2218

    Google Scholar 

  • Raming K, Krieger J, Breer H (1990) Primary structure of a pheromone-binding protein from Antheraea pernyi: homologies with other ligand-carrying proteins. J Comp Physiol B 160:503–509

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson HM, Martos R, Sears CR, Todres EZ, Walden KKO, Nardi JB (1999) Diversity of odourant binding proteins revealed by an expressed sequence tag project on male Manduca sexta moth antennae. Insect Mol Biol 8:501–518

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandler B, Nikonona L, Leal WS, Clardy J (2000) Sexual attraction in the silkworm moth: structure of the pheromone-binding-protein-bombykol complex. Chem Biol 7:143–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinbrecht RA (1998) Odorant-binding proteins: structural aspects. In: Murphy C (ed) Olfaction and taste XII. Ann NY Acad Sci 855:323–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinbrecht RA, Ozaki M, Ziegelberger G (1992) Immunocytochemical localization of pheromone-binding proteins in moth antennae. Cell Tissue Res 270:287–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinbrecht RA, Laue M, Ziegelberger G (1995) Immunolocalization of pheromone-binding protein and general odorant-binding protein in olfactory sensilla of the silkmoths Antheraea and Bombyx. Cell Tissue Res 282:203–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinbrecht RA, Shanbhag SR, Carlson JR, Pikielny CW, Smith DP (2000) Immuno-localization of five odorant-binding proteins on the antennae of Drosophila melanogaster (abstract). Chem Senses 25:647

    Google Scholar 

  • Stengl M, Ziegelberger G, Boekhoff I, Krieger J (1999) Perireceptor events and transduction mechanisms in insect olfaction. In: Hansson BS (ed) Insect olfaction. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 49–66

  • Van den Berg, MJ, Ziegelberger G (1991) On the function of the pheromone-binding protein in the olfactory hairs of Antheraea polyphemus. J Insect Physiol 37:79–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogt RG, Prestwich GD, Lerner MR (1991) Odorant-binding protein subfamilies associate with distinct classes of olfactory receptors neurons in insects. J Neurobiol 22:74–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Wojtasek H, Leal SW (1999) Conformational change in the pheromone-binding protein from Bombyx mori induced by pH and by interaction with membranes. J Biol Chem 274:30950–30956

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegelberger G (1995) Redox-shift of the pheromone-binding protein in the silkmoth Antheraea polyphemus. Eur J Biochem 232:706–711

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to Dr. J. Krieger for providing the recombinant PBPs of A. polyphemus and A. pernyi and the delipidated PBP1 of A. polyphemus, and for discussion. We thank R.A. Steinbrecht and B. Pophof for comments and A. Biederman-Thorson for linguistic help.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K.-E. Kaissling.

Additional information

Communicated by G. Heldmaier

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maida, R., Ziegelberger, G. & Kaissling, KE. Ligand binding to six recombinant pheromone-binding proteins of Antheraea polyphemus and Antheraea pernyi . J Comp Physiol B 173, 565–573 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00360-003-0366-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00360-003-0366-4

Keywords

Navigation