Abstract
This paper discusses the two classic measures of concordance between two linear orders L and L′, the Kendall tau and the Spearman rho, equivalently, the Kendall and Spearman distances between such orders. We give an expression for ρ(L,L′)−τ(L,L′) as a function of the parameters of the partial order L∪L′, which allows the determination of extremal values for this difference and an investigation of when tau and rho are equal. This expression for ρ(L,L′)−τ(L,L′) is derived from a relation between the Kendall and Spearman distances between linear orders that is equivalent to both the Guilbaud (1980) formula linking rho, tau, and a third coefficient sigma, and Daniels’s (1950) inequality. We also prove an apparently new monotonicity property of rho. In the conclusion we point out possible extensions and add general historical comments.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AIGNER, M. (1979), Combinatorial Theory, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
BARBUT, M., and MONJARDET, B. (1970), Ordre et Classification, Algèbre et Combinatoire, Paris: Hachette.
BARTHELÉMY, J.P., and MONJARDET, B. (1981), “The Median Procedure in Cluster Analysis and Social Choice Theory,” Mathematical Social Sciences, 1, 235–268.
CRITCHLOW, D.E. (1985), “Metric Methods for Analyzing Partially Ranked Data,” Lectures Notes in Statistics, 34, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
DANIELS, H.E. (1948), “A Property of Rank Correlations,” Biometrika, 35, 416–417.
DANIELS, H.E. (1950), “Rank Correlation and Population Models,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B, 12, 171–181.
DEGENNE, A. (1972), Techniques Ordinales en Analyse des Données: Statistique, Paris: Hachette.
DIACONIS, P. (1988), Group Representations in Probability and Statistics. Hayward: Institute of Mathematical Statistics.
DIACONIS, P., and GRAHAM R.L. (1977), “Spearman’s Footrule as a Measure of Disarray,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B, 39, 262–268.12, 171–181.
DURBIN, J., and STUART, A. (1951), “Inversions and Rank Correlation Coefficients,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B, 13, 303–309.
FISHBURN, P.C. (1985). Interval Orders and Interval Graphs. A Study of Partially Ordered Sets. New York: Wiley.
FLIGNER, M. A., and VERDUCCI, J.S. Eds. (1993), “Probability Models and Statistical Analyses for Ranking Data,” Lectures Notes in Statistics, 80, Berlin: Springer Verlag.
GIAKOUMAKIS, V., and MONJARDET, B. (1987a), “Coefficients d’accord entre deux préordres totaux,” Statistique et Analyse des Données, 1–2, 46–79.
GIAKOUMAKIS, V., and MONJARDET, B. (1987b), “Coefficients d’accord entre deux préordres totaux; comparaison ordinale des coefficients,” Mathématiques et Sciences Humaines, 98, 69–87.
GIBBONS, J.D. (1971), Nonparametric Statistical Inference, New York: Mc Graw-Hill.
GUILBAUD, G.Th. (1980), “Relation entre les deux coefficients de corrélation de rangs,” Mathématiques et Sciences Humaines, 72, 45–59.
GRIFFIN, H.D. (1958), “Graphical Computation of tau as a Coefficient of Disarray,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 53, 441–447.
KNUTH, D.E. (1973), Sorting and Searching, The Art of Computer Programming, Vol.3, Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.
KENDALL, M.G. (1970): Rank Correlation Methods, New York: Hafner (first edition, 1948).
KRUSKAL, W.H. (1958), “Ordinal Measures of Association,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 53, 814–861.
LE CONTE DE POLY-BARBUT, C. (1988), “Sur les graphes admettant le nombre maximum de sous-graphes à trois sommets et deux arêtes et les paires d’ordres totaux qui maximisent |ρ−τ|,” European Journal of Combinatorics, 9, 575–579.
MERRIL, S. (1984), “A Comparison of Efficiency of Multicandidate Systems,” American Journal of Political Science, 23, 28–49.
MOHRING, R.H. (1984), “Algorithmic Aspects of Comparability Graphs and Interval Graphs,” in Graphs and Orders, Ed., I. Rival, Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 41–101.
MOHRING, R.H. (1989), “Computationally Tractable Classes of Ordered Sets,” in Algorithms and Orders, Ed., I. Rival. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 283–306.
MONJARDET, B. (1985a), “Concordance et consensus d’ordres totaux: les coefficients K et W,” Revue de Statistique Appliquée, 33, 2, 55–87.
MONJARDET, B. (1985b), “A Use for Frequently Rediscovering a Concept,” Order, 1, 415–417.
MONJARDET, B. (1990), “Sur diverses formes de la ‘régle de Condorcet’ d’agrégation des préférences,” Mathématiques Informatique et Sciences Humaines, 111, 61–71.
MONJARDET, B., and LE CONTE DE POLY-BARBUT, C. (1986), “Valeurs extrêmales de la différence des deux coefficients d’accord ρ et τ entre ordres totaux,” Comptes Rendus Académie des Sciences Paris, t. 303, Série I, n o 10, 483–486.
MORAN, P.A.P., WHITFIELD, J.W., and DANIELS, H.E. (1950), “Symposium on Ranking Methods,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 12, 153–191.
RODRIGUES, O. (1839), “Notes sur les inversions ou dérangements produits dans les permutations,” Journal de Mathématiques pures et appliquées, Série, I, 4, 236–240.
ROBERTS, F. (1979), Measurement Theory, Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.
SAVAGE, I.R. (1964), “Contributions to the Theory of Rank Order Statistics: Applications of Lattice Theory,” Review of the International Statistical Institute, 32, 52–64.
SCHRIEVER, B.F. (1987), “Monotonicity of Rank Statistics in Some Non-parametric Testing Problems,” Statistica Neerlandica, 41, 99–109.
TROTTER, W.T. (1992), Combinatorics and Partially Ordered Sets: Dimension Theory, Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
YOUNG, H.P., (1988), “Condorcet’s Theory of Voting,” American Political Science Review, 82, 1231–1244.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The author wrote this paper during a sabbatical leave spent at the GERAD and at the Département de Mathématiques et de Statistique de l’Université de Montréal. He is glad to thank them for their kind hospitality and support. He thanks also the referees, P. Hansen and P. Arabie for their useful remarks and important editorial help on the first versions of this paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Monjardet, B. Concordance between two linear orders: The Spearman and Kendall coefficients revisited. Journal of Classification 14, 269–295 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s003579900013
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s003579900013