Skip to main content
Log in

Market arbitrage, social choice and the core

  • Published:
Social Choice and Welfare Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

 This paper establishes a clear connection between equilibrium theory, game theory and social choice theory by showing that, for a well defined social choice problem, a condition which is necessary and sufficient to solve this problem – limited arbitrage – is the same as the condition which is necessary and sufficient to establish the existence of an equilibrium and the core. The connection is strengthened by establishing that a market allocation, which is in the core, can always be realized as a social allocation, i.e. an allocation which is optimal according to an ordering chosen by a social choice rule. Limited arbitrage characterizes those economies without Condorcet triples, and those for which Arrow’s paradox can be resolved on choices of large utility values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 30 December 1994/Accepted: 12 August 1996

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chichilnisky, G. Market arbitrage, social choice and the core. Soc Choice Welfare 14, 161–198 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s003550050059

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s003550050059

Keywords

Navigation