Skip to main content
Log in

Assent-maximizing social choice

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Social Choice and Welfare Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We take a decision theoretic approach to the classic social choice problem, using data on the frequency of choice problems to compute social choice functions. We define a family of social choice rules that depend on the population’s preferences and on the probability distribution over the sets of feasible alternatives that the society will face. Our methods generalize the well-known Kemeny Rule. In the Kemeny Rule, it is known a priori that the subset of feasible alternatives will be a pair. We define a distinct social choice function for each distribution over the feasible subsets. Our rules can be interpreted as distance minimization—selecting the order closest to the population’s preferences, using a metric on the orders that reflects the distribution over the possible feasible sets. The distance is the probability that two orders will disagree about the optimal choice from a randomly selected available set. We provide an algorithmic method to compute these metrics in the case where the probability of a given feasible set is a function only of its cardinality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahn D, Oliveros S (2010) Combinatorial voting. Ecomometrica (forthcoming)

  • Apesteguia J, Ballester MA (2010) A measure of rationality and welfare

  • Arrow KJ (1951) Social choice and individual values. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthelemy JP, Monjardet B (1981) The median procedure in cluster analysis and social choice theory. Math Soc Sci 1: 235–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conitzer V, Davenport A, Kalagnanam J (2006) Improved bounds for computing Kemeny rankings. In: Proceedings of the 21st national conference on artificial intelligence (AAAI-06), Boston

  • Craven J (1996) Best fit social choices: an alternative to arrow. Econ J 106(438): 1161–1174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daugherty Z, Eustis A, Minton G, Orrison M (2009) Voting, the symmetric group, and representation theory. Am Math Mon 116(8): 667–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diaconis P (1988) Group representations in probability and statistics. Lecture notes monograph series, vol 11, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Hayward

  • Kemeny JG (1959) Mathematics without numbers. Deadalus 88: 577–591

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemeny JG, Snell JL (1962) Mathematical models in the social sciences, Chap. 2. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Klamler C (2008) A distance measure for choice functions. Soc Choice Welf 30: 419–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Conte de Poly-Barbut C (1990) Automorphismes du permutoedre et votes de Condorcet. Math Inf Sci Hum 111: 73–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu T, Boutilier C (2010) The unavailable candidate model: a decision-theoretic view of social choice. In: Proceedings of the 11th ACM conference on electronic commerce, 2010

  • Moulin H (1988) Axioms of cooperative decision making. Econometric society monograph number 15. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reuter K (1996) Linear extensions of a poset as abstract convex sets. Mathematisches Seminar, Universitat Hamburg

  • Saari D (1994) The geometry of voting. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Saari D (2001) Chaotic elections. American Mathematical Society, Providence

    Google Scholar 

  • Young HP (1988) Condorcet’s theory of voting. Am Polit Sci Rev 82(2): 1231–1244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young HP, Levenglick A (1978) A consistent extension of Condorcet’s election principle. SIAM J Appl Math 35(2): 285–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler GM (1995) Lectures on polytopes, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol 152. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jerry R. Green.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baldiga, K.A., Green, J.R. Assent-maximizing social choice. Soc Choice Welf 40, 439–460 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-011-0614-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-011-0614-6

Keywords

Navigation