Abstract.
We establish a strong impossibility theorem of a rational social choice that the proximity preservation (also called weak proximorphism WPX) and the diagonal surjectivity are logically inconsistent. The result is valid for finite or infinite alternatives, discrete or continuous. It generalizes the Baigent theorem, largely weakening his antecedent. For continuum set of alternatives, we clarify the notion of WPX by showing (1) WPX almost implies the continuity, (2) WPX is almost rigid. These observations raise the issue whether WPX is a natural condition for a social welfare function. A splitting reformulation of the proximity preservation which is weaker but rational is suggested.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huang, WH. Is proximity preservation rational in social choice theory?. Soc Choice Welfare 23, 315–332 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-003-0224-z
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-003-0224-z