Skip to main content
Log in

Towards converged statistics in three-dimensional canopy-dominated flows

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experiments in Fluids Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multi-plane telecentric 2D particle image velocimetry (PIV) measurements were performed over and within the interstices of rough beds in an open-channel flow with low relative submergence. Two rough beds constituted of cubes and elongated cuboid obstacles in a square array were investigated with the same modified relative submergence. The telecentric method allowed the complete fluid space within the interstices and above to be measured without disturbing the flow. Nine planes were measured yielding a total of 17 planes by symmetry consideration. This allowed double-average computations to be performed with a 17 \(\times\) 17 horizontal spatial resolution yielding allowing to resolve adequately the shear stress terms contributing to the total shear stress. It is shown that subsampling with a coarse grid of 1 \(\times\) 5 yields acceptable spatially converged results, but only for the double-averaged longitudinal velocities. Together, the spatially averaged turbulent shear stresses and the dispersive stresses require a sampling of at least \(9\times 9\) within the canopy and \(5\times 5\) above for the errors relative to the total shear stress to remain below 5%. Above the canopy, the dispersive shear stress depends largely on the aspect ratio of the roughness obstacles, being much higher for the cubes than for elongated cuboids. Finally, the converged total shear stress is shown to yield the vertical integrated drag stress as well as the repartition of the flat-bed shear stress to the total shear stress.

Graphic abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akutina Y, Eiff O, Moulin FY, Rouzes M (2019) Lateral bed-roughness variation in shallow open-channel flow with very low submergence. Env Fluid Mech 2019:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Aubinet M, Feigenwinter C, Heinesch B, Bernhofer C, Canepa E, Lindroth A, Montagnani L, Rebmann C, Sedlak P, Gorsel EV (2010) Direct advection measurements do not help to solve the night-time co2 closure problem: evidence from three different forests. Agric For Meteorol 150(5):655–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai K, Katz J, Meneveau C (2015) Turbulent flow structure inside a canopy with complex multi-scale elements. Bound Layer Meteorol 155(3):435–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battiato I, Rubol S (2014) Single-parameter model of vegetated aquatic flows. Water Resour Res 50(8):6358–6369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackman K, Perret L, Calmet I, Rivet C (2017) Turbulent kinetic energy budget in the boundary layer developing over an urban-like rough wall using piv. Phys Fluids 29(8):085113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohrer G, Katul GG, Walko RL, Avissar R (2009) Exploring the effects of microscale structural heterogeneity of forest canopies using large-eddy simulations. Bound Layer Meteorol 132(3):351–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro IP, Xie ZT, Fuka V, Robins AG, Carpentieri M, Hayden P, Hertwig D, Coceal O (2016) Measurements and computations of flow in an urban street system. Bound Layer Meteorol 162(2):207–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng H, Castro IP (2002) Near wall flow over urban-like roughness. Bound Layer Meteorol 104(2):229–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coceal O, Thomas TG, Castro IP, Belcher SE (2006) Mean flow and turbulence statistics over groups of urban-like cubical obstacles. Bound Layer Meteorol 121(3):491–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coceal O, Thomas TG, Belcher SE (2007) Spatial variability of flow statistics within regular building arrays. Bound Layer Meteorol 125(3):537–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day TA, Gober P, Xiong FS, Wentz EA (2002) Temporal patterns in near-surface co2 concentrations over contrasting vegetation types in the phoenix metropolitan area. Agric For Meteorol 110(3):229–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eiff O, Florens E, Moulin FY (2014) Roughness parameters in shallow open-channel flows. In: Proceedings of the international conference on fluvial hydraulics, Lausanne, Switzerland, vol 1, pp 287–293

  • Finnigan J (2000) Turbulence in plant canopies. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 32(1):519–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florens E (2010) Couche limite turbulente dans les écoulements à surface libre: étude expérimentale d’effets de macro-rugosités. PhD thesis, Université de Toulouse

  • Florens E, Eiff O, Moulin FY (2013) Defining the roughness sublayer and its turbulence statistics. Exp Fluids 54(4):1500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higashino M (2018) Oxygen transfer at the sediment/water interface for sediment bed with rough surface. J Geophys Res Biogeosci 123(10):3283–3292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho YK, Liu CH (2017) A wind tunnel study of flows over idealised urban surfaces with roughness sublayer corrections. Theor Appl Climatol 130(1):305–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hondzo M (1998) Dissolved oxygen transfer at the sediment-water interface in a turbulent flow. Water Resour Res 34(12):3525–3533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Järvelä J (2002) Flow resistance of flexible and stiff vegetation: a flume study with natural plants. J Hydrol 269(1):44–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kono T, Tamura T, Ashie Y (2010) Numerical investigations of mean winds within canopies of regularly arrayed cubical buildings under neutral stability conditions. Bound layer Meteorol 134(1):131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald RW (2000) Modelling the mean velocity profile in the urban canopy layer. Bound Layer Meteorol 97(1):25–45

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Manes C, Pokrajac D, McEwan I (2007) Double-averaged open-channel flows with small relative submergence. J Hydraul Eng 133(8):896–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mignot E, Barthelemy E, Hurter D (2009) Double-averaging analysis and local flow characterization of near-bed turbulence in gravel-bed channel flows. J Fluid Mech 618:279–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moltchanov S, Bohbot-Raviv Y, Shavit U (2011) Dispersive stresses at the canopy upstream edge. Bound Layer Meteorol 139(2):333–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moriwaki R, Kanda M, Nitta H (2006) Carbon dioxide build-up within a suburban canopy layer in winter night. Atmos Env 40(8):1394–1407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nepf HM, Ghisalberti M (2008) Flow and transport in channels with submerged vegetation. Acta Geophys 56(3):753–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nezu I, Sanjou M (2008) Turburence structure and coherent motion in vegetated canopy open-channel flows. J Hydro-Environ Res 2(2):62–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikora V, Goring D, McEwan I, Griffiths G (2001) Spatially averaged open-channel flow over rough bed. J Hydraul Eng 127(2):123–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikora V, McEwan I, McLean S, Coleman S, Pokrajac D, Walters R (2007) Double-averaging concept for rough-bed open-channel and overland flows: theoretical background. J Hydraul Eng 133(8):873–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor BL, Hondzo M (2008) Dissolved oxygen transfer to sediments by sweep and eject motions in aquatic environments. Limnol Oceanogr 53(2):566–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pokrajac D, Finnigan J, Manes C, McEwan I, Nikora V (2006) On the definition of the shear velocity in rough bed open channel flows. Proc Int Conf Fluvial Hydraul 1:89–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Pokrajac D, Campbell LJ, Nikora V, Manes C, McEwan I (2007) Quadrant analysis of persistent spatial velocity perturbations over square-bar roughness. Exp Fluids 42(3):413–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raupach MR, Shaw RH (1982) Averaging procedures for flow within vegetation canopies. Bound Layer Meteorol 22(1):79–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rickenmann D, Recking A (2011) Evaluation of flow resistance in gravel-bed rivers through a large field data set. Water Resour Res 47(7):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouzès M, Moulin FY, Florens E, Eiff O (2018) Low relative-submergence effects in a rough-bed open-channel flow. J Hydraul Res 57:139–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith J, McLean S (1977) Spatially averaged flow over a wavy surface. J Geophys Res 82(12):1735–1746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson N, Shaw R (1977) Higher-order closure model for canopy flow. J Appl Meteorol 16(11):1197–1205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie ZT, Fuka V (2018) A note on spatial averaging and shear stresses within urban canopies. Bound Layer Meteorol 167(1):171–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan C, Nepf HM, Huang WX, Cui GX (2017) Large eddy simulation of flow and scalar transport in a vegetated channel. Env Fluid Mech 17(3):497–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang JQ, Kerger F, Nepf HM (2015) Estimation of the bed shear stress in vegetated and bare channels with smooth beds. Water Resour Res 51(5):3647–3663

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the French National Research Agency (Flowres project, Grant no. ANR-14-CE03-0010) and was performed using HPC resources from CALMIP (project P16012).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frédéric Y. Moulin.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chagot, L., Moulin, F.Y. & Eiff, O. Towards converged statistics in three-dimensional canopy-dominated flows. Exp Fluids 61, 24 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-019-2857-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-019-2857-4

Navigation