Abstract
Multi-plane telecentric 2D particle image velocimetry (PIV) measurements were performed over and within the interstices of rough beds in an open-channel flow with low relative submergence. Two rough beds constituted of cubes and elongated cuboid obstacles in a square array were investigated with the same modified relative submergence. The telecentric method allowed the complete fluid space within the interstices and above to be measured without disturbing the flow. Nine planes were measured yielding a total of 17 planes by symmetry consideration. This allowed double-average computations to be performed with a 17 \(\times\) 17 horizontal spatial resolution yielding allowing to resolve adequately the shear stress terms contributing to the total shear stress. It is shown that subsampling with a coarse grid of 1 \(\times\) 5 yields acceptable spatially converged results, but only for the double-averaged longitudinal velocities. Together, the spatially averaged turbulent shear stresses and the dispersive stresses require a sampling of at least \(9\times 9\) within the canopy and \(5\times 5\) above for the errors relative to the total shear stress to remain below 5%. Above the canopy, the dispersive shear stress depends largely on the aspect ratio of the roughness obstacles, being much higher for the cubes than for elongated cuboids. Finally, the converged total shear stress is shown to yield the vertical integrated drag stress as well as the repartition of the flat-bed shear stress to the total shear stress.
Graphic abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akutina Y, Eiff O, Moulin FY, Rouzes M (2019) Lateral bed-roughness variation in shallow open-channel flow with very low submergence. Env Fluid Mech 2019:1–23
Aubinet M, Feigenwinter C, Heinesch B, Bernhofer C, Canepa E, Lindroth A, Montagnani L, Rebmann C, Sedlak P, Gorsel EV (2010) Direct advection measurements do not help to solve the night-time co2 closure problem: evidence from three different forests. Agric For Meteorol 150(5):655–664
Bai K, Katz J, Meneveau C (2015) Turbulent flow structure inside a canopy with complex multi-scale elements. Bound Layer Meteorol 155(3):435–457
Battiato I, Rubol S (2014) Single-parameter model of vegetated aquatic flows. Water Resour Res 50(8):6358–6369
Blackman K, Perret L, Calmet I, Rivet C (2017) Turbulent kinetic energy budget in the boundary layer developing over an urban-like rough wall using piv. Phys Fluids 29(8):085113
Bohrer G, Katul GG, Walko RL, Avissar R (2009) Exploring the effects of microscale structural heterogeneity of forest canopies using large-eddy simulations. Bound Layer Meteorol 132(3):351–382
Castro IP, Xie ZT, Fuka V, Robins AG, Carpentieri M, Hayden P, Hertwig D, Coceal O (2016) Measurements and computations of flow in an urban street system. Bound Layer Meteorol 162(2):207–230
Cheng H, Castro IP (2002) Near wall flow over urban-like roughness. Bound Layer Meteorol 104(2):229–259
Coceal O, Thomas TG, Castro IP, Belcher SE (2006) Mean flow and turbulence statistics over groups of urban-like cubical obstacles. Bound Layer Meteorol 121(3):491–519
Coceal O, Thomas TG, Belcher SE (2007) Spatial variability of flow statistics within regular building arrays. Bound Layer Meteorol 125(3):537–552
Day TA, Gober P, Xiong FS, Wentz EA (2002) Temporal patterns in near-surface co2 concentrations over contrasting vegetation types in the phoenix metropolitan area. Agric For Meteorol 110(3):229–245
Eiff O, Florens E, Moulin FY (2014) Roughness parameters in shallow open-channel flows. In: Proceedings of the international conference on fluvial hydraulics, Lausanne, Switzerland, vol 1, pp 287–293
Finnigan J (2000) Turbulence in plant canopies. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 32(1):519–571
Florens E (2010) Couche limite turbulente dans les écoulements à surface libre: étude expérimentale d’effets de macro-rugosités. PhD thesis, Université de Toulouse
Florens E, Eiff O, Moulin FY (2013) Defining the roughness sublayer and its turbulence statistics. Exp Fluids 54(4):1500
Higashino M (2018) Oxygen transfer at the sediment/water interface for sediment bed with rough surface. J Geophys Res Biogeosci 123(10):3283–3292
Ho YK, Liu CH (2017) A wind tunnel study of flows over idealised urban surfaces with roughness sublayer corrections. Theor Appl Climatol 130(1):305–320
Hondzo M (1998) Dissolved oxygen transfer at the sediment-water interface in a turbulent flow. Water Resour Res 34(12):3525–3533
Järvelä J (2002) Flow resistance of flexible and stiff vegetation: a flume study with natural plants. J Hydrol 269(1):44–54
Kono T, Tamura T, Ashie Y (2010) Numerical investigations of mean winds within canopies of regularly arrayed cubical buildings under neutral stability conditions. Bound layer Meteorol 134(1):131
Macdonald RW (2000) Modelling the mean velocity profile in the urban canopy layer. Bound Layer Meteorol 97(1):25–45
Manes C, Pokrajac D, McEwan I (2007) Double-averaged open-channel flows with small relative submergence. J Hydraul Eng 133(8):896–904
Mignot E, Barthelemy E, Hurter D (2009) Double-averaging analysis and local flow characterization of near-bed turbulence in gravel-bed channel flows. J Fluid Mech 618:279–303
Moltchanov S, Bohbot-Raviv Y, Shavit U (2011) Dispersive stresses at the canopy upstream edge. Bound Layer Meteorol 139(2):333–351
Moriwaki R, Kanda M, Nitta H (2006) Carbon dioxide build-up within a suburban canopy layer in winter night. Atmos Env 40(8):1394–1407
Nepf HM, Ghisalberti M (2008) Flow and transport in channels with submerged vegetation. Acta Geophys 56(3):753–777
Nezu I, Sanjou M (2008) Turburence structure and coherent motion in vegetated canopy open-channel flows. J Hydro-Environ Res 2(2):62–90
Nikora V, Goring D, McEwan I, Griffiths G (2001) Spatially averaged open-channel flow over rough bed. J Hydraul Eng 127(2):123–133
Nikora V, McEwan I, McLean S, Coleman S, Pokrajac D, Walters R (2007) Double-averaging concept for rough-bed open-channel and overland flows: theoretical background. J Hydraul Eng 133(8):873–883
O’Connor BL, Hondzo M (2008) Dissolved oxygen transfer to sediments by sweep and eject motions in aquatic environments. Limnol Oceanogr 53(2):566–578
Pokrajac D, Finnigan J, Manes C, McEwan I, Nikora V (2006) On the definition of the shear velocity in rough bed open channel flows. Proc Int Conf Fluvial Hydraul 1:89–98
Pokrajac D, Campbell LJ, Nikora V, Manes C, McEwan I (2007) Quadrant analysis of persistent spatial velocity perturbations over square-bar roughness. Exp Fluids 42(3):413–423
Raupach MR, Shaw RH (1982) Averaging procedures for flow within vegetation canopies. Bound Layer Meteorol 22(1):79–90
Rickenmann D, Recking A (2011) Evaluation of flow resistance in gravel-bed rivers through a large field data set. Water Resour Res 47(7):1–22
Rouzès M, Moulin FY, Florens E, Eiff O (2018) Low relative-submergence effects in a rough-bed open-channel flow. J Hydraul Res 57:139–166
Smith J, McLean S (1977) Spatially averaged flow over a wavy surface. J Geophys Res 82(12):1735–1746
Wilson N, Shaw R (1977) Higher-order closure model for canopy flow. J Appl Meteorol 16(11):1197–1205
Xie ZT, Fuka V (2018) A note on spatial averaging and shear stresses within urban canopies. Bound Layer Meteorol 167(1):171–179
Yan C, Nepf HM, Huang WX, Cui GX (2017) Large eddy simulation of flow and scalar transport in a vegetated channel. Env Fluid Mech 17(3):497–519
Yang JQ, Kerger F, Nepf HM (2015) Estimation of the bed shear stress in vegetated and bare channels with smooth beds. Water Resour Res 51(5):3647–3663
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by the French National Research Agency (Flowres project, Grant no. ANR-14-CE03-0010) and was performed using HPC resources from CALMIP (project P16012).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chagot, L., Moulin, F.Y. & Eiff, O. Towards converged statistics in three-dimensional canopy-dominated flows. Exp Fluids 61, 24 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-019-2857-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-019-2857-4