Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental analysis of transonic buffet on a 3D swept wing using fast-response pressure-sensitive paint

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experiments in Fluids Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 03 June 2020

This article has been updated

Abstract

Transonic buffeting phenomena on a three-dimensional swept wing were experimentally analyzed using a fast-response pressure-sensitive paint (PSP). The experiment was conducted using an 80%-scaled NASA Common Research Model in the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) 2 m × 2 m Transonic Wind Tunnel at a Mach number of 0.85 and a chord Reynolds number of 1.54 × 106. The angle of attack was varied between 2.82° and 6.52°. The calculation of root-mean-square (RMS) pressure fluctuations and spectral analysis were performed on measured unsteady PSP images to analyze the phenomena under off-design buffet conditions. We found that two types of shock behavior exist. The first is a shock oscillation characterized by the presence of “buffet cells” formed at a bump Strouhal number St of 0.3–0.5, which is observed under all off-design conditions. This phenomenon arises at the mid-span wing and is propagated spanwise from inboard to outboard. The other is a large spatial amplitude shock oscillation characterized by low-frequency broadband components at St < 0.1, which appears at higher angles of attack (α ≥ 6.0°) and behaves more like two-dimensional buffet. The transition between these two shock behaviors correlates well with the rapid increase of the wing-root strain fluctuation RMS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 03 June 2020

    There are typographical errors in the original publication of this article.

Abbreviations

C :

PSP calibration coefficient

C L :

Lift coefficient

C M :

Pitching moment coefficient

C P :

Pressure coefficient

C Prms :

RMS pressure fluctuations

\(C_{P}^{\prime }\) :

Dynamic component of pressure coefficient

Coh2 :

Coherence of the cross-spectrum

I :

PSP emission intensity

M :

Free-stream Mach number

M loc :

Local Mach number

N :

Number of data points

P :

Pressure

P 0 :

Total pressure

PSD:

Power spectral density

Re :

Reynolds number

S XX , S YY :

Auto-spectrum of X and Y

S XY :

Cross-spectrum between X and Y

St:

Strouhal number (= fcmac/U)

T :

Temperature

U :

Free-stream velocity

U C :

Convection velocity

b :

Span length

c :

Chord length

c mac :

Mean aerodynamic chord length

f :

Frequency

f S :

Frame rate of the camera

k + :

Roughness height

t :

Time

x :

Model chordwise location

y :

Model spanwise location

Δf :

Frequency resolution for FFT analysis

α :

Angle of attack

ϕ XY :

Phase shift of the cross-spectrum

η :

Spanwise location normalized by the half-span length

κ :

Reduced frequency (= 2πfc/U)

λ :

Spanwise wavelength

ave:

Time-averaged

ref:

Reference condition, 100 kPa

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the members of the Next Generation Aeronautical Innovation Hub Center and Wind Tunnel Technology Center, JAXA, for their kind preparation and operation of the wind-tunnel test. We gratefully acknowledge helpful discussions with Mr. Tsutomu Nakajima, Dr. Makoto Ueno, and Mr. Kodai Hiura. TiO2 samples used for the PSP binder were provided by Tayca Corporation. The present study was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant number JP16J02503.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yosuke Sugioka.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (MP4 2726 KB)

Supplementary material 2 (MP4 4921 KB)

Supplementary material 3 (MP4 2898 KB)

Supplementary material 4 (MP4 5026 KB)

Supplementary material 5 (MP4 2826 KB)

Supplementary material 6 (MP4 5095 KB)

Supplementary material 7 (PDF 122 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sugioka, Y., Koike, S., Nakakita, K. et al. Experimental analysis of transonic buffet on a 3D swept wing using fast-response pressure-sensitive paint. Exp Fluids 59, 108 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-018-2565-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-018-2565-5

Navigation