Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Extraperitoneal laparoscopic simple prostatectomy with urethra preservation using urethral initiation as the entry point: a practical approach for the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The present study introduces a modified surgical procedure, extraperitoneal laparoscopic simple prostatectomy (LSP) with urethra preservation using urethral initiation as the entry point, and evaluates its feasibility, safety, and efficacy in the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO).

Materials and methods

A total of 50 patients with BPO underwent modified LSP from January 2018 to December 2020. The main surgical procedures performed were as follows: transversely incision of prostate surgical capsule at the urethral initiation; creating of the subcapsular plane and the space between urethra and adenoma; removal of lobes with preservation of urethra followed by suturing of capsule. Preoperative, perioperative, follow-up parameters, and complications were recorded and analyzed.

Results

Operative time was (106.34 ± 28.00) min and intraoperative blood loss was (98.80 ± 130.58) ml. Continuous bladder irrigation (CBI) was not performed routinely, catheterization duration was (5.26 ± 2.99) days, and postoperative hospital stay was (5.42 ± 1.62) days. Significant improvements were observed in functional outcomes, whereas no retrograde ejaculation, urinary incontinence, and urethral stricture occurred. Urethral rupture was not significantly influenced by operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and prostate volume. However, it prolonged CBI duration, drainage tube retention time, catheterization duration, and postoperative hospital stay. Operative time decreased with an increase in the number of cases, and the surgeon achieved proficiency level after handling 21–25 cases.

Conclusion

Extraperitoneal LSP with urethra preservation using urethral initiation as the entry point is a feasible, repeatable, safe, and effective surgical procedure, which is suitable for treating BPO.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gravas S, Cornu JN, Gacci M et al (2021) Management of non-neurogenic male LUTS. EAU guidelines. https://uroweb.org/guideline/treatment-of-non-neurogenic-male-luts/#5

  2. Han M, Partin AW (2016) Simple prostatectomy: open and robot-assisted laparoscopic approaches. In: AJ Wein (ed) Campbell-Walsh urology, 11th edn. Philadelphia, PA, p 2535

  3. Dixon AR, Lord PH, Madigan MR (1990) The Madigan prostatectomy. J Urol 144:1401–1403. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)39753-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kuntz RM, Lehrich K, Ahyai SA (2008) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus open prostatectomy for prostates greater than 100 grams: 5-year follow-up results of a randomised clinical trial. Eur Urol 53:160–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2007.08.036

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lin Y, Wu X, Xu A, Ren R, Zhou X, Wen Y et al (2016) Transurethral enucleation of the prostate versus transvesical open prostatectomy for large benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Urol 34:1207–1219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1735-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mariano MB, Tefilli MV, Graziottin TM, Morales CM, Goldraich IH (2006) Laparoscopic prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia–a six-year experience. Eur Urol 49:127–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2005.09.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rehman J, Khan SA, Sukkarieh T, Chughtai B, Waltzer WC (2005) Extraperitoneal laparoscopic prostatectomy (adenomectomy) for obstructing benign prostatic hyperplasia: transvesical and transcapsular (Millin) techniques. J Endourol 19:491–496. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2005.19.491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Morató O, Poves I, Burdío F, Sánchez-Velázquez P, Duran X, Grande L (2020) Evaluation of the learning curve for laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy by CUSUM analyses. Cohort study. Int J Surg 80:61–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.05.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rassweiler JJ, Fiedler-Hruza M (2019) The learning curve for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: there is much beyond a trifecta. Eur Urol 75:257–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mariano MB, Graziottin TM, Tefilli MV (2002) Laparoscopic prostatectomy with vascular control for benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 167:2528–2529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Al-Aown A, Liatsikos E, Panagopoulos V, Kyriazis I, Kallidonis P, Georgiopoulos I et al (2015) Laparoscopic simple prostatectomy: a reasonable option for large prostatic adenomas. Urol Ann 7:297–302. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.156144

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Baldini A, Fassi-Fehri H, Duarte RC, Crouzet S, Ecochard R, Abid N et al (2017) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus laparoscopic transcapsular prostatectomy: perioperative results and three-month follow-up. Curr Urol 10:81–86. https://doi.org/10.1159/000447156

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Desai MM, Fareed K, Berger AK, Astigueta JC, Irwin BH, Aron M et al (2010) Single-port transvesical enucleation of the prostate: a clinical report of 34 cases. BJU Int 105:1296–1300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.09106.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chlosta PL, Varkarakis IM, Drewa T, Dobruch J, Jaskulski J, Antoniewicz AA et al (2011) Extraperitoneal laparoscopic Millin prostatectomy using finger enucleation. J Urol 186:873–876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.04.080

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kordan Y, Canda AE, Köseoğlu E, Balbay D, Laguna MP, de la Rosette J (2020) Robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy: a systematic review. J Clin Med 9:1798. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9061798

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Quan C, Chang W, Chen J, Li B, Niu Y (2011) Laparoscopic Madigan prostatectomy. J Endourol 25:1879–1882. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2011.0117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Xing N, Guo Y, Yang F, Tian L, Zhang J, Yan Y et al (2012) Laparoscopic simple prostatectomy with prostatic urethra preservation for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Transl Androl Urol 1:9–13. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2012.02.03

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Xie JB, Tan YA, Wang FL, Xuan Q, Sun YW, Xiao J et al (2014) Extraperitoneal laparoscopic adenomectomy (Madigan) versus bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia greater than 80 ml: complications and functional outcomes after 3-year follow-up. J Endourol 28:353–359. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2013.0374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Matei DV, Brescia A, Mazzoleni F, Spinelli M, Musi G, Melegari S et al (2012) Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP): does it make sense? BJU Int 110:E972–E979. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11192.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Manickam R, Nachimuthu S, Kallappan S, Pai MG (2018) Laparoscopic adenomectomy in BPH—does it have a role today? Asian J Urol 5:37–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2017.11.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rivas JG, Drewa T (2014) Laparoscopic simple prostatectomy, a lost child of laparoscopic surgery. Cent Eur J Urol 67:385–386. https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2014.04.art13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yun HK, Kwon JB, Cho SR, Kim JS (2010) Early experience with laparoscopic retropubic simple prostatectomy in patients with voluminous benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Kor J Urol 51:323–329. https://doi.org/10.4111/kju.2010.51.5.323

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This technique is approved and supported by “New Technology, New Project, New Treatment” in our hospital (2019-120).

Funding

This research received no specific Grant from any funding agency.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SL: project design and development, data collection and analysis, manuscript writing and editing. LZ: project development, manuscript writing. JW: data analysis. YT: manuscript writing and editing. TH: project development, manuscript writing and editing. JX: project development, manuscript editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuhan Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All conflicts of interest, including specific financial interests and relationships and affiliations relevant to the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript are the following: none.

Ethics approval

This retrospective study was approved by our institution’s ethics review board.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, S., Zhou, L., Wang, J. et al. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic simple prostatectomy with urethra preservation using urethral initiation as the entry point: a practical approach for the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction. World J Urol 40, 973–982 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-03932-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-03932-5

Keywords

Navigation