Abstract
Purpose
The accurate selection of patients who are most likely to benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an important challenge in oncology. Serum AGR has been found to be associated with oncological outcomes in various malignancies. We assessed the association of pre-therapy serum albumin-to-globulin ratio (AGR) with pathologic response and oncological outcomes in patients treated with neoadjuvant platin-based chemotherapy followed by radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for clinically non-metastatic UTUC.
Methods
We retrospectively included all clinically non-metastatic patients from a multicentric database who had neoadjuvant platin-based chemotherapy and RNU for UTUC. After assessing the pretreatment AGR cut‐off value, we found 1.42 to have the maximum Youden index value. The overall population was therefore divided into two AGR groups using this cut‐off (low, < 1.42 vs high, ≥ 1.42). A logistic regression was performed to measure the association with pathologic response after NAC. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses tested the association of AGR with OS and RFS.
Results
Of 172 patients, 58 (34%) patients had an AGR < 1.42. Median follow-up was 26 (IQR 11–56) months. In logistic regression, low AGR was not associated with pathologic response. On univariable analyses, pre-therapy serum AGR was neither associated with OS HR 1.15 (95% CI 0.77–1.74; p = 0.47) nor RFS HR 1.48 (95% CI 0.98–1.22; p = 0.06). These results remained true regardless of the response to NAC.
Conclusion
Pre-therapy low serum AGR before NAC followed by RNU for clinically high-risk UTUC was not associated with pathological response or long-term oncological outcomes. Biomarkers that can complement clinical factors in UTUC are needed as clinical staging and risk stratification are still suboptimal leading to both over and under treatment despite the availability of effective therapies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare disease which represents only 5% of urothelial carcinoma, and has generally a worse prognosis compared to bladder cancer [1]. Surgery is the cornerstone of its management and its indication is based on a risk stratification model to choose between radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) and kidney sparing surgery (KSS) [2,3,4,5]. Based on the management of bladder cancer, it has been suggested to offer perioperative chemotherapy to patients at high risk [6,7,8]. Recently, a phase 3 prospective trial reported a benefit in terms of disease-free survival and metastasis-free survival for adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy for UTUC patients with pT2 and higher stage after RNU [9]. Optimal adjuvant systemic treatment after RNU is, however, not deliverable to many patients due to their loss of renal function with RNU in this elderly population. On the other hand, there is no solid evidence for neoadjuvant systemic treatment in UTUC with only small retrospective studies [10]. With the reliability and reproducibility of the current preoperative risk stratification being poor, there is a high risk of both overtreatment and undertreatment [2, 11]. Second, giving NAC to patients with UTUC who are generally older with comorbidities may lead to significant adverse events.
Nevertheless, despite the weakness of available studies, a recent multicenter study including 267 patients reported that pathologic complete response was achieved in 10% of patients and downstaging in 45%, resulting in improved survival [12]. In addition, a metanalysis still found a benefit for NAC in UTUC with an improvement in pathologic downstaging (pDS) and, pathological complete response (pCR) as well as on overall (OS) and cancer-specific (CSS) survival [6]. While we are still waiting for the results of the first randomized trial assessing the benefit of NAC (URANUS NCT02969083) in UTUC, the biggest challenge is to identify which patients are most likely to benefit from preoperative systemic therapy and which patient can be spared an inefficient NAC and, therefore, be offered a different systemic therapy or RNU alone with or without adjuvant chemotherapy.
Nowadays, molecular signatures arising from genetic sequencing are actually under investigation [13,14,15], but simple and cost-effective biomarkers such as serum protein-based biomarkers could still be useful as long as they add value beyond that obtained by standard features [16, 17].
Serum albumin-to-globulin ratio (AGR) has been shown to prognosticate oncological outcomes for many malignancies such as bladder cancer and UTUC [18,19,20,21,22,23]. Albumin and globulins are the two major serum proteins and have been proven to reflect the inflammatory process [24]. Albumin has an antioxidative role in plasma and in the interstitial space allowing the matrix deposition and cell proliferation. During inflammation, an hypoalbuminemia is induced due to the increased capillary escape of serum albumin into the interstitium. Therefore, serum albumin can be classified as a negative acute-phase protein. Globulin contains inflammatory mediators such as chemokines, cytokines, and other small inflammatory proteins. The local or systemic immune response in cancer-related inflammation is associated with an increased production of these inflammatory mediators. The combination of these proteins as a ratio can help to assess the systemic inflammatory response and the patient nutritional status [25]. In UTUC, abnormal serum preoperative AGR has been found to be associated with adverse pathologic features, survival, and poorer outcomes in patients treated with RNU [21, 22]. To date, the assessment of serum AGR in UTUC has been only performed for patients without NAC, and only one study in rectal cancer tried to evaluate its predictive value before an NAC with capecitabine or 5-FU based chemotherapy, but did not found a predictive value of AGR in this indication [26].
We hypothesized that pre-therapy serum AGR could be a predictor in this setting. To test this, we assessed the value of pre-therapy serum AGR for predicting pathological response and its prognostic value for survival outcomes in a large multicentric international cohort of contemporary patients who received platinum-based NAC before RNU for UTUC.
Materials and methods
Study population
We performed a retrospective analysis of patient treated with NAC followed by radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for UTUC from an multicenter database arising from international cooperation. Patients with clinically distant metastatic disease (M status), positive clinical lymph nodes (cN+), and those lost to follow-up were not included in the analysis. The study was approved by the local committees of ethics in all institutions and informed consent was obtained from eligible patients. Patient information was anonymized prior to data sharing.
Management and follow-up
NAC regimens consisted of platin-based combination chemotherapy if the renal function allowed it [7]. Chemotherapy regimen (cisplatin or carboplatin) and number of cycles were administered at clinician discretion in accordance with institutional standards and based on individual shared decision-making with the patient.
All RNU procedures were performed using standard techniques [5, 27, 28]. The decision to perform lymphadenectomy and its extent were at the surgeon discretion based on patient and preoperative disease characteristics following standard templates previously described [29]. All surgical specimens were exanimated by a local dedicated uro-pathologists. Tumor grade was determined on the basis of the World Health Organization/International Society of Urologic Pathology classification of 2004 [30]. Tumor stage was evaluated using the 2002 Union for International Cancer Control tumor, node, metastasis classification system.
Preoperative baseline blood tests were performed within the month prior to RNU. Serum AGR levels were calculated as the ratio of baseline serum albumin to the total protein-baseline serum albumin. To define the optimal pretreatment AGR cut‐off value, we carried out a time‐dependent receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis for 3-year OS as the end‐point, considering the median OS time (12 months). The median value of AGR was calculated as 1.57 (IQR 1.37–1.83). A cut-off value 1.42 was determined as the highest Youden index value [21, 22]. Therefore, we divided the population into two groups according to this AGR cut-off (lower < 1.42 vs higher ≥ 1.42). OS time was calculated from the date of NAC to death or last follow-up. CSS time was calculated from the date of the NAC to death from disease or last follow-up.
The patient follow-up was performed according to guidelines, at the time, with a consultation generally every 3 months during the first 2 years after RNU, every 6 months the third to the fifth year, and then annually.
Outcome measurement
Our primary objective was to evaluate the association of pre-therapy serum AGR with pathologic response after NAC assessed based on the RNU specimen. Pathologic responses were defined as pathologic complete response (ypT0) and pathologic downstaging (≤ ypT1).
Our secondary objective was to evaluate the association of serum AGR with oncologic survival outcomes including recurrence-free (RFS) and overall (OS) survival.
Statistical analysis
The differences between continuous and categorical variables across AGR groups were assessed using Mann–Whitney U test and Chi-square tests, respectively. To assess the relation between groups and pathologic outcomes, we used binary univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses. A log-rank test was performed to compare differences in survival between AGR groups, Kaplan–Meier curves were used to estimate RFS and OS. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to determine the factors associated with RFS, CSS, and OS. We included in the model the multivariable analysis of all the variables with p value < 0.2 in the univariable analysis as well as the most clinically relevant variables according to the primary endpoint. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. All tests were two-sided. Analyses were performed using R version 3.6.2. (2009–2019 RStudio, Inc.).
Results
Overall, 172 patients were included in the analyses. Among them, 58 (34%) patients had an AGR < 1.42 (low AGR) and 114 (66%) had an AGR ≥ 1.42 (high AGR). Patient’s characteristics according to their serum AGR category are shown in Table 1. There was no significant difference between groups. Pathologic characteristics after NAC and RNU were also similar between groups (Table 2). There were 20 patients with a pT0 on the final specimen, 10 (16.4) in the high AGR and 10 (33.3) in the low AGR group.
A logistic regression analysis was performed to assess if AGR was predictor of overall or complete pathologic response. In univariable analysis, a low serum AGR was not associated with pathologic downstaging (≤ ypT1N0) [OR 0.87, (95% CI 0.46–1.63); p = 0.66]. On multivariable logistic regression analysis that adjusted for the effect age, gender, and tumor location, pre-therapy AGR was still not correlated with partial or complete pathologic response (all p value > 0.05).
The median follow-up for the whole cohort was 26 (IQR 11–56) months. The 5-year RFS estimates were 61.7% for high AGR and 53.3% for low AGR. There was no difference in the Kaplan–Meier analysis according to the serum AGR for RFS [HR 1.33, 95% CI 0.77–2.31; p = 0.30] (Fig. 1a). The 5-year OS estimates were 60.6% for high AGR and 49.4% for low AGR. There was no difference in OS on the Kaplan–Meier analysis according to AGR category [HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.63–1.96; p = 0.72] (Fig. 1b).
On univariable analyses, the only variables associated with RFS and OS were advanced tumor stage (≥ pT2) on pathological examination (p < 0.001), positive lymph nodes (p < 0.001), response to NAC on final pathologic examination (p < 0.001), and cisplatin-based regimen (p = 0.01) (Table 3).
A predefined subgroup analysis was performed into responders and nonresponders of NAC. The AGR level before NAC was not correlated with OS or RFS (all p value > 0.05) in both of these subgroups (Figs. 2, 3). Similarly, in the subgroup analysis of patient with complete response only, AGR was still not associated with RFS or OS (all p value > 0.05).
We also performed a subgroup analysis according to the regimen of NAC. Neither in the group of patients who received cisplatin-based chemotherapy nor in the group of patients who received carboplatin-based chemotherapy was AGR associated with OS, RFS, or CSS (all p value > 0.05).
Discussion
This study intended to assess the potential role of serum AGR as a biomarker to predict pathological response and oncological outcomes in patients treated by NAC followed by RNU. The Cox regression analysis did not identify any significant relationship between pre-therapy serum AGR and oncological outcomes. Moreover, we assessed if the AGR status could predict response to NAC using standard logistic regression analyses. Again, pre-therapy serum AGR was not correlated to NAC. We confirmed the association of established clinicopathological predictors of oncologic and pathologic outcomes.
These findings are not in contrast with the current literature. In fact, two studies already assessed the potential of the serum AGR as a biomarker in patients with UTUC treated by RNU. In 2015, Zang et al. found that an AGR level below 1.45 was an independent predictor of OS and CSS in a retrospective cohort of 187 patients treated by RNU [22]. Similarly, Xu et al. found in 620 patients that a low AGR level was associated with OS CSS and also with RFS using the same cut-off [21]. Despite these positives and promising results, none of these studies assessed the serum AGR status using Harrel’s concordance index (C-index) or decision curve analysis (DCA) to confirm the clinical relevance of the biomarker [16]. Therefore, serum AGR still needs further evaluation and validation in larger prospective cohorts. Moreover, in these studies, all the patients who had an NAC were excluded from the analysis. Thus, our study is the first to explore the potential value of pretherapy serum AGR in this specific population of patients who received NAC.
Despite a larger number of studies exploring the role of AGR as an oncological biomarker in different cancers, few studies assessed its value for predicting response to NAC before surgery. Indeed, only one study, in rectal cancer, assessed specifically AGR in patients receiving NAC before surgery and found a weak but statistically significant association with pathological and oncological outcomes [31]. Nevertheless, many other prognostic serum-based biomarkers have been assessed before NAC, but their prognostic value in this specific setting remains unclear. For example, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) which has been largely assessed, did not predict complete response to NAC despite its good predictive value on oncological outcome in patients without NAC in other cancers such as breast, esophageal [32], or cervical cancer [33] [34, 35]. It was only a potential predictor in association with other markers such as the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio [35]. Similarly in urothelial carcinoma, the benefit of NLR in NAC setting is controversial and Seah et al. did not find association with pathologic response in MIBC, but Brisan et al. found a slight association between NLR and response to NAC in patients with MIBC only when there were squamous cell features [36].
The hypothesis for these controversial results is mostly based on the inflammatory and nutritional status alteration during NAC. Many studies found a high heterogeneity and modifications in inflammatory biomarkers during and after NAC [19, 37]. The modification between pre- and post-NAC of these biomarkers implied that their clinical value might be complicated to interpret. Interestingly, some studies found that post-NAC inflammatory biomarkers could not predict survival [38]. Moreover, very few studies tried to assess the inflammatory markers changes during NAC and their impact on the prognosis, and were not able to give a clear conclusion [25, 39]. Chemotherapy and surgery impact inflammation and immunologic status, and their combination might also modify largely the serum biomarkers, leading to these controversial results.
Several limitations of our study should be acknowledged. The main limitation of the study was its retrospective and multicenter design which led to not standardized laboratory or pathologic evaluation that could confound the results. AGR was assessed only before NAC, but it should have been interesting to evaluate it also after chemotherapy. Its combination with other serum biomarkers might have been interesting to test, but due to the retrospective and multicentric design, we were not able to assess other serum variables. There is a potential intervention bias in our observational cohort study from the inequality in nutritional support. The malnutrition might have been corrected temporarily to meet requirements for NAC and surgery, and the markers might not reflect the status of the autonomic nutrition level.
Conclusion
In our study, pretherapy serum AGR status before NAC followed by RNU was neither associated with pathologic response nor oncological outcomes on RFS and OS. Advanced stage, positive lymph nodes, and response to NAC were associated with RFS and OS.
The potential effect of NAC on systemic inflammation in UTUC patients, the tumor microenvironment, and the clinical natural history of the cancer may explain the lack of predictive accuracy for serum AGR biomarker in this specific setting.
Data availability
Yes.
Code availability
Yes.
References
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2020) Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin 70(1):7–30
Rouprêt M, Babjuk M, Compérat E, Zigeuner R, Sylvester RJ, Burger M et al (2018) European Association of Urology Guidelines on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: 2017 Update. Eur Urol 73(1):111–122
Chromecki TF, Bensalah K, Remzi M, Verhoest G, Cha EK, Scherr DS et al (2011) Prognostic factors for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Nat Rev Urol 8(8):440–447
Chromecki TF, Cha EK, Fajkovic H, Margulis V, Novara G, Scherr DS et al (2012) The impact of tumor multifocality on outcomes in patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy. Eur Urol 61(2):245–253
Xylinas E, Rink M, Cha EK, Clozel T, Lee RK, Fajkovic H et al (2014) Impact of distal ureter management on oncologic outcomes following radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Eur Urol 65(1):210–217
Quhal F, Mori K, Sari Motlagh R, Laukhtina E, Pradere B, Rouprêt M et al (2020) Efficacy of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy for localized and locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Clin Oncol 25:1037–1054. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-020-01650-9
Xylinas E, Rink M, Margulis V, Clozel T, Lee RK, Comploj E et al (2013) Impact of renal function on eligibility for chemotherapy and survival in patients who have undergone radical nephro-ureterectomy. BJU Int 112(4):453–461
Svatek RS, Shariat SF, Lasky RE, Skinner EC, Novara G, Lerner SP et al (2010) The effectiveness of off-protocol adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Clin Cancer Res Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res 16(17):4461–4467
Birtle A, Johnson M, Chester J, Jones R, Dolling D, Bryan RT et al (2020) Adjuvant chemotherapy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (the POUT trial): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30415-3
Rouprêt M, Babjuk M, Burger M, Capoun O, Cohen D, Compérat EM et al (2020) European Association of Urology Guidelines on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: 2020 Update. Eur Urol
Remzi M, Haitel A, Margulis V, Karakiewicz P, Karakiewizc P, Montorsi F et al (2009) Tumour architecture is an independent predictor of outcomes after nephroureterectomy: a multi-institutional analysis of 1363 patients. BJU Int 103(3):307–311
Foerster B, Abufaraj M, Petros F, Azizi M, Gupta M, Schweitzer D et al (2020) Efficacy of preoperative chemotherapy in high risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma. J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000737
Robinson BD, Vlachostergios PJ, Bhinder B, Liu W, Li K, Moss TJ et al (2019) Upper tract urothelial carcinoma has a luminal-papillary T-cell depleted contexture and activated FGFR3 signaling. Nat Commun 10(1):2977
Tse J, Ghandour R, Singla N, Lotan Y (2019) Molecular predictors of complete response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder and upper tracts. Int J Mol Sci. 20(4):793
Kim KH, Do I-G, Kim HS, Chang MH, Kim HS, Jun HJ et al (2010) Excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) expression in advanced urothelial carcinoma patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy. APMIS Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand 118(12):941–948
Shariat SF, Lotan Y, Vickers A, Karakiewicz PI, Schmitz-Dräger BJ, Goebell PJ et al (2010) Statistical consideration for clinical biomarker research in bladder cancer. Urol Oncol 28(4):389–400
Bensalah K, Montorsi F, Shariat SF (2007) Challenges of cancer biomarker profiling. Eur Urol 52(6):1601–1609
Chi J, Xie Q, Jia J, Liu X, Sun J, Chen J et al (2018) Prognostic value of albumin/globulin ratio in survival and lymph node metastasis in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cancer 9(13):2341–2348
Liu J, Dai Y, Zhou F, Long Z, Li Y, Liu B et al (2016) The prognostic role of preoperative serum albumin/globulin ratio in patients with bladder urothelial carcinoma undergoing radical cystectomy. Urol Oncol Semin Orig Investig 34(11):484.e1-484.e8
Niwa N, Matsumoto K, Ide H, Nagata H, Oya M (2018) Prognostic value of pretreatment albumin-to-globulin ratio in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer 16(3):e655–e661
Xu H, Tan P, Ai J, Huang Y, Lin T, Yang L et al (2018) Prognostic impact of preoperative albumin-globulin ratio on oncologic outcomes in upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with radical nephroureterectomy. Clin Genitourin Cancer 16(5):e1059–e1068
Zhang B, Yu W, Zhou L-Q, He Z-S, Shen C, He Q et al (2015) Prognostic significance of preoperative albumin-globulin ratio in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma Gao X, editor. PLoS ONE 10(12):e0144961
Zhang Y, Wang L, Lin S, Wang R (2018) Preoperative albumin-to-globulin ratio as a significant prognostic indicator in urologic cancers: a meta-analysis. Cancer Manag Res 10:4695–4708
Gabay C, Kushner I (1999) Acute-phase proteins and other systemic responses to inflammation. N Engl J Med 340(6):448–454
He J, Pan H, Liang W, Xiao D, Chen X, Guo M et al (2017) Prognostic effect of albumin-to-globulin ratio in patients with solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cancer 8(19):4002–4010
Li Q, Meng X, Liang L, Xu Y, Cai G, Cai S (2015) High preoperative serum globulin in rectal cancer treated with neoadjunctive chemoradiation therapy is a risk factor for poor outcome. Am J Cancer Res 5:2856
Favaretto RL, Shariat SF, Chade DC, Godoy G, Adamy A, Kaag M et al (2010) The effect of tumor location on prognosis in patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Eur Urol 58(4):574–580
Lughezzani G, Jeldres C, Isbarn H, Sun M, Shariat SF, Alasker A et al (2009) Nephroureterectomy and segmental ureterectomy in the treatment of invasive upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a population-based study of 2299 patients. Eur J Cancer Oxf Engl 1990 45(18):3291–3297
Roscigno M, Brausi M, Heidenreich A, Lotan Y, Margulis V, Shariat SF et al (2011) Lymphadenectomy at the time of nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial cancer. Eur Urol 60(4):776–783
Eble J, Sauter G, Epstein J, Sesterhenn IA (eds) (2004) World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. Pathology and genetics of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs. IARC Press, Lyon
Toiyama Y, Oki S, Okugawa Y, Ide S, Yasuda H, Fujikawa H et al (2018) Clinical impact of preoperative albumin-globulin ratio in patients with rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Oncology 95(5):270–280
van Hootegem SJM, Smithers BM, Gotley DC, Brosda S, Thomson IG, Thomas JM et al (2019) Baseline neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio holds no prognostic value for esophageal and junctional adenocarcinoma in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Dis Esophagus 33:doz082
Wang D, Wu M, Feng F, Huang H, Yang J, Shen K et al (2013) Pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios do not predict survival in patients with cervical cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical hysterectomy. Chin Med J (Engl) 126(8):1464–1468
Qian Y, Tao J, Li X, Chen H, Lu Q, Yang J et al (2018) Peripheral inflammation/immune indicators of chemosensitivity and prognosis in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. OncoTargets Ther 11:1423–1432
Graziano V, Grassadonia A, Iezzi L, Vici P, Pizzuti L, Barba M et al (2019) Combination of peripheral neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio is predictive of pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Breast Edinb Scotl 44:33–38
Seah J-A, Leibowitz-Amit R, Atenafu EG, Alimohamed N, Knox JJ, Joshua AM et al (2015) Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer 13(4):e229–e233
Li Z, Li S, Ying X, Zhang L, Shan F, Jia Y et al (2020) The clinical value and usage of inflammatory and nutritional markers in survival prediction for gastric cancer patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and D2 lymphadenectomy. Gastric Cancer 23:540–549
Jin H, Sun J, Zhu K, Liu X, Zhang Q, Shen Q et al (2017) The prognostic value of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio is superior to derived neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in advanced gastric cancer treated with preoperative chemotherapy and sequential R0 resection: a 5-year follow-up. OncoTargets Ther 10:2655–2664
Kitayama J, Yasuda K, Kawai K, Sunami E, Nagawa H (2010) Circulating lymphocyte number has a positive association with tumor response in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for advanced rectal cancer. Radiat Oncol Lond Engl 3(5):47
Funding
Open access funding provided by Medical University of Vienna.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors state that they have no conflict of interest that might bias this work.
Ethical standards
This study has been approved by the appropriate ethics committee.
Consent to participate
Yes.
Consent for publication
Yes.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Pradere, B., D’Andrea, D., Schuettfort, V.M. et al. Pre-therapy serum albumin-to-globulin ratio in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. World J Urol 39, 2567–2577 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03479-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03479-3