Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fertility and sexuality issues in congenital lifelong urology patients: male aspects

  • Topic Paper
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To review existing literature about fertility and sexuality of boys born with complex congenital genitourinary anomalies.

Methods

A Pubmed review was performed in December 2018 to identify the most relevant original manuscripts regarding male complex congenital conditions affecting the urogenital system in male patients including spina bifida (SB), bladder exstrophy–epispadias complex (BEEC) and hypospadias. A comprehensive review was drafted exploring sexual dysfunction from a medical, psychosexual, surgical and reproductive point of view during transition from childhood (or adolescence) to adulthood.

Results

About 75% of men with SB have erectile dysfunction (ED) (Gamé et al. in Urology 67(3):566–570, 2006; Diamond et al. in 58(4):434–435, 1986). Most SB patients have impaired sexual development mainly due to diminished self-esteem, dependence on caregivers and lack of privacy (Blum et al. in Pediatrics 88(2):280–285, 1991). Men with BEEC have fewer intimate relationships than women because of the greater difficulties with issues regarding their genitalia and sexual activities (Deans et al. in Am J Obstet Gynecol 206(6):496.e1–496.e6, 2012). However, a good quality of life is achievable with the effective use of coping strategies (Deng et al. in Transl Androl Urol 7:941, 2018; Rikken et al. in BMC Womens Health 18(1):163, 2018; Friedler et al. in Reprod Biomed Online 32(1):54–61, 2016). Chordee occurs in 25% of all hypospadias patients. More severe hypospadias is related to a greater risk for complications. The long-term sexual quality of life (QoL) in men who underwent hypospadias surgery is influenced by a lot of factors. Therefore, an interactive and dynamic biopsychosocial model of sexual QoL was proposed.

Conclusions

The care of patients with congenital urologic conditions becomes a challenge especially in the period of ‘transition’. The goal of follow-up is a holistic management viewed from a medical, psychosexual, surgical end reproductive point. All patients should be asked for specific urinary, fecal or sexual concerns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AYA:

Adolescents and young adults

BE:

Bladder exstrophy

BEEC:

Bladder exstrophy–epispadias complex

DSD:

Disorders of sexual development

ED:

Erectile dysfunction

SB:

Spina bifida

VC:

Ventral curvature

References

  1. Wood D (2014) Adolescent urology: developing lifelong care for congenital anomalies. Nat Rev Urol 11:289

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Boulet SL, Yang Q, Mai C, Kirby RS, Collins JS, Robbins JM et al (2008) Trends in the postfortification prevalence of spina bifida and anencephaly in the United States. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 82(7):527–532

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gamé X, Moscovici J, Gamé L, Sarramon J-P, Rischmann P, Malavaud B (2006) Evaluation of sexual function in young men with spina bifida and myelomeningocele using the International Index of Erectile Function. Urology 67(3):566–570

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Diamond DA, Rickwood AM, Thomas DG (1986) Penile erections in myelomeningocele patients. Br J Urol 58(4):434–435

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Decter RM, Furness PD, Nguyen TA, McGowan M, Laudermilch C, Telenko A (1997) Reproductive understanding, sexual functioning and testosterone levels in men with spina bifida. J Urol 157(4):1466–1468

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Palmer JS, Kaplan WE, Firlit CF (1999) Erectile dysfunction in spina bifida is treatable. Lancet 354(9173):125–126

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Palmer JS, Kaplan WE, Firlit CF (2000) Erectile dysfunction in patients with spina bifida is a treatable condition. J Urol 164(3 Pt 2):958–961

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Overgoor MLE, de Jong TPVM, Cohen-Kettenis PT, Edens MA, Kon M (2013) Increased sexual health after restored genital sensation in male patients with spina bifida or a spinal cord injury: the TOMAX procedure. J Urol 189(2):626–632

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Deng N, Thirumavalavan N, Beilan JA, Tatem AJ, Hockenberry MS, Pastuszak AW et al (2018) Sexual dysfunction and infertility in the male spina bifida patient. Transl Androl Urol 7:941

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Bong GW, Rovner ES (2007) Sexual health in adult men with spina bifida. Sci World J 7:1466–1469

    Google Scholar 

  11. Coakley RM, Holmbeck GN, Friedman D, Greenley RN, Thill AW (2002) A longitudinal study of pubertal timing, parent-child conflict, and cohesion in families of young adolescents with spina bifida. J Pediatr Psychol 27(5):461–473

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Greene SA, Frank M, Zachmann M, Prader A (1985) Growth and sexual development in children with meningomyelocele. Eur J Pediatr 144(2):146–148

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vroege JA, Zeijlemaker BY, Scheers MM (1998) Sexual functioning of adult patients born with meningomyelocele. A pilot study. Eur Urol 34(1):25–29

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McAndrew I (1979) Adolescents and young people with spina bifida. Dev Med Child Neurol 21(5):619–629

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Blum RW, Resnick MD, Nelson R, St Germaine A (1991) Family and peer issues among adolescents with spina bifida and cerebral palsy. Pediatrics 88(2):280–285

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Diseth TH, Emblem R, Schultz A (1999) Mental health, psychosocial functioning, and quality of life in patients with bladder exstrophy and epispadias—an overview. World J Urol 17:239–248

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee C, Reutter HM, Gräßer MF, Fisch M, Noeker M (2006) Gender-associated differences in the psychosocial and developmental outcome in patients affected with the bladder exstrophy-epispadias complex. BJU Int 97:349–353

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Castagnetti M, Tocco A, Capizzi A, Rigamonti W, Artibani W (2010) Sexual function in men born with classic bladder exstrophy: a norm related study. J Urol 183:1118–1122

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Catti M, Paccalin C, Rudigoz RC, Mouriquand P (2006) Quality of life for adult women born with bladder and cloacal exstrophy: a long-term follow up. J Pediatr Urol 2:16–22

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hurrell RA, Fullwood C, Keys J, Dickson AP, Fishwick J, Whitnall B et al (2015) Psychosocial screening at paediatric BEEC clinics: a pilot evaluation study. J Pediatr Urol 11:79-e1

    Google Scholar 

  21. Reiner WG, Gearhart JP, Kropp B (2008) Suicide and suicidal ideation in classic exstrophy. J Urol 180:1661–1664

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Woodhouse CR (1998) Sexual function in boys born with exstrophy, myelomeningocele, and micropenis. Urology 52(1):3–11

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Spinoit AF, Poelaert F, Groen LA, Van Laecke E, Hoebeke P (2013) Hypospadias repair in a single reference Centre: Long term follow-up is mandatory to detect the real complication rate! J Urol [Internet]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23306089. Accessed 12 Jan 2013

  24. Spinoit A-F, Poelaert F, Van Praet C, Groen L-A, Van Laecke E, Hoebeke P (2015) Grade of hypospadias is the only factor predicting for re-intervention after primary hypospadias repair: a multivariate analysis from a cohort of 474 patients. J Pediatr Urol 11(2):70-e1

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lumen N, Vierstraete-Verlinde S, Oosterlinck W, Hoebeke P, Palminteri E, Goes C et al (2016) Buccal versus lingual mucosa graft in anterior urethroplasty: a prospective comparison of surgical outcome and donor site morbidity. J Urol 195(1):112–117

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rubenwolf P, Thomas C, Thüroff JW, Stein R (2016) Sexual function and fertility of women with classic bladder exstrophy and continent urinary diversion. J Urol 196(1):140–145

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Brucker SY, Gegusch M, Zubke W, Rall K, Gauwerky JF, Wallwiener D (2008) Neovagina creation in vaginal agenesis: development of a new laparoscopic Vecchietti-based procedure and optimized instruments in a prospective comparative interventional study in 101 patients. Fertil Steril 90(5):1940–1952

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sandler AD, Worley G, Leroy EC, Stanley SD, Kalman S (1996) Sexual function and erection capability among young men with spina bifida. Dev Med Child Neurol 38(9):823–829

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Elias ER, Sadeghi-Nejad A (1994) Precocious puberty in girls with myelodysplasia. Pediatrics 93(3):521–522

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hayden PW, Davenport SL, Campbell MM (1979) Adolescents with myelodysplasia: impact of physical disability on emotional maturation. Pediatrics 64(1):53–59

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sawyer SM, Roberts KV (1999) Sexual and reproductive health in young people with spina bifida. Dev Med Child Neurol 41(10):671–675

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Dorner S (1977) Sexual interest and activity in adolescents with spina bifida. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 18(3):229–237

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Morcel K, Lavoué V, Jaffre F, Paniel B-J, Rouzier R (2013) Sexual and functional results after creation of a neovagina in women with Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser syndrome: a comparison of nonsurgical and surgical procedures. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 169(2):317–320

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Cheikhelard A, Bidet M, Baptiste A, Viaud M, Fagot C, Khen-Dunlop N et al (2018) Surgery is not superior to dilation for the management of vaginal agenesis in Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser syndrome: a multicenter comparative observational study in 131 patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol 219(3):281.e1–281.e9

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hartmann D, Sarton J (2014) Chronic pelvic floor dysfunction. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 28(7):977–990

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hagenfeldt K, Janson PO, Holmdahl G, Falhammar H, Filipsson H, Frisen L et al (2008) Fertility and pregnancy outcome in women with congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency. Hum Reprod 23(7):1607–1613

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Dumic M, Janjanin N, Ille J, Zunec R, Spehar A, Zlopasa G et al (2005) Pregnancy outcomes in women with classical congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 18(9):887–895

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Reichman DE, White PC, New MI, Rosenwaks Z (2014) Fertility in patients with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Fertil Steril 101(2):301–309

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hoepffner W, Schulze E, Bennek J, Keller E, Willgerodt H (2004) Pregnancies in patients with congenital adrenal hyperplasia with complete or almost complete impairment of 21-hydroxylase activity. Fertil Steril 81(5):1314–1321

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Deans R, Banks F, Liao L-M, Wood D, Woodhouse C, Creighton SM (2012) Reproductive outcomes in women with classic bladder exstrophy: an observational cross-sectional study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 206(6):496.e1–496.e6

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ryckman J, Black A, Fleming N (2014) Adolescent urethral coitus: 2 cases and review of the literature. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 27(1):e9–12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Chan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Zamora J, Thornton JG, Raine-Fenning N, Coomarasamy A (2011) The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 17(6):761–771

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Venetis CA, Papadopoulos SP, Campo R, Gordts S, Tarlatzis BC, Grimbizis GF (2014) Clinical implications of congenital uterine anomalies: a meta-analysis of comparative studies. Reprod Biomed Online 29(6):665–683

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Tomaževič T, Ban-Frangež H, Virant-Klun I, Verdenik I, Požlep B, Vrtačnik-Bokal E (2010) Septate, subseptate and arcuate uterus decrease pregnancy and live birth rates in IVF/ICSI. Reprod Biomed Online 21(5):700–705

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Rikken JFW, Kowalik CR, Emanuel MH, Bongers MY, Spinder T, de Kruif JH et al (2018) The randomised uterine septum transsection trial (TRUST): design and protocol. BMC Womens Health 18(1):163

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Friedler S, Grin L, Liberti G, Saar-Ryss B, Rabinson Y, Meltzer S (2016) The reproductive potential of patients with Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser syndrome using gestational surrogacy: a systematic review. Reprod Biomed Online 32(1):54–61

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Brännström M, Bokström H, Dahm-Kähler P, Diaz-Garcia C, Ekberg J, Enskog A et al (2016) One uterus bridging three generations: first live birth after mother-to-daughter uterus transplantation. Fertil Steril 106(2):261–266

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Chmel R, Novackova M, Pastor Z, Fronek J (2018) The interest of women with Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser syndrome and laparoscopic vecchietti neovagina in uterus transplantation. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 31(5):480–484

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Hendrix SL, Clark A, Nygaard I, Aragaki A, Barnabei V, McTiernan A (2002) Pelvic organ prolapse in the Women’s Health Initiative: gravity and gravidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 186(6):1160–1166

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Kupesić S, Kurjak A, Skenderovic S, Bjelos D (2002) Screening for uterine abnormalities by three-dimensional ultrasound improves perinatal outcome. J Perinat Med 30(1):9–17

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Anusionwu I, Baradaran N, Trock BJ, Stec AA, Gearhart JP, Wright EJ (2012) Is pelvic osteotomy associated with lower risk of pelvic organ prolapse in postpubertal females with classic bladder exstrophy? J Urol 188(6):2343–2346

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Liu JS, Vo AX, Doolittle J, Hamoui N, Lewicky-Gaupp C, Kielb SJ (2016) Characterizing pelvic organ prolapse in adult spina bifida patients. Urology 97:273–276

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A-FS: protocol project development, data management, data analysis, manuscript editing and writing. MW: manuscript writing. CS: data collection. TA: data collection. NC: data collection. MC: data collection. RH: data collection. MKH: data collection. PJ: data collection. RM: data collection. JLPS: data collection. JR: data collection. LT: data collection. GDW: protocol project development, data management, data analysis, manuscript editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne-Françoise Spinoit.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interests to report.

Animal and human rights statement

This is a review of existing data in the literature; it does not concern research involving human or animals participants. No patients’ data were analyzed, as the study was a review of the literature.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Spinoit, AF., Waterschoot, M., Sinatti, C. et al. Fertility and sexuality issues in congenital lifelong urology patients: male aspects. World J Urol 39, 1013–1019 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03121-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03121-2

Keywords

Navigation