Abstract
Background
Cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for muscle invasive bladder cancer improves all-cause and cancer specific survival. We aimed to evaluate whether the detection of carcinoma in situ (CIS) at the time of initial transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) has an oncological impact on the response to NAC prior to radical cystectomy.
Patients and methods
Patients were identified retrospectively from 19 centers who received at least three cycles of NAC or induction chemotherapy for cT2-T4aN0-3M0 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder followed by radical cystectomy between 2000 and 2013. The primary and secondary outcomes were pathological response and overall survival, respectively. Multivariable analysis was performed to determine the independent predictive value of CIS on these outcomes.
Results
Of 1213 patients included in the analysis, 21.8% had concomitant CIS. Baseline clinical and pathologic characteristics of the ‘CIS’ versus ‘no-CIS’ groups were similar. The pathological response did not differ between the two arms when response was defined as pT0N0 (17.9% with CIS vs 21.9% without CIS; p = 0.16) which may indicate that patients with CIS may be less sensitive to NAC or ≤ pT1N0 (42.8% with CIS vs 37.8% without CIS; p = 0.15). On Cox regression model for overall survival for the cN0 cohort, the presence of CIS was not associated with survival (HR 0.86 (95% CI 0.63–1.18; p = 0.35). The presence of LVI (HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.01–1.96; p = 0.04), hydronephrosis (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.23–2.16; p = 0.001) and use of chemotherapy other than ddMVAC (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.34–0.94; p = 0.03) were associated with shorter overall survival. For the whole cohort, the presence of CIS was also not associated with survival (HR 1.05 (95% CI 0.82–1.35; p = 0.70).
Conclusion
In this multicenter, real-world cohort, CIS status at TURBT did not affect pathologic response to neoadjuvant or induction chemotherapy. This study is limited by its retrospective nature as well as variability in chemotherapy regimens and surveillance regimens.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Grossman HB, Natale RB, Tangen CM, Speights VO, Vogelzang NJ, Trump DL, deVere White RW, Sarosdy MF, Wood DP Jr, Raghavan D, Crawford ED (2003) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus cystectomy compared with cystectomy alone for locally advanced bladder cancer. N Engl J Med 349(9):859–866 PMID: 12944571
Zargar H, Espiritu PN, Fairey AS, Zargar H, Espiritu PN, Fairey AS, Mertens LS, Dinney CP, Mir MC, Krabbe LM, Cookson MS, Jacobsen NE, Gandhi NM, Griffin J, Montgomery JS, Vasdev N, Yu EY, Youssef D, Xylinas E, Campain NJ, Kassouf W, Dall’Era MA, Seah JA, Ercole CE, Horenblas S, Sridhar SS, McGrath JS, Aning J, Shariat SF, Wright JL, Thorpe AC, Morgan TM, Holzbeierlein JM, Bivalacqua TJ, North S, Barocas DA, Lotan Y, Garcia JA, Stephenson AJ, Shah JB, van Rhijn BW, Daneshmand S, Spiess PE, Black PC et al (2015) Multicenter assessment of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Eur Urol 67(2):241–249 PMID: 25257030
Zargar H, Zargar-Shoshtari K, Lotan Y, Shah JB, van Rhijn BW, Daneshmand S, Spiess PE, Black P, Collaborators (2016) Final Pathological Stage after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer-Does pT0 Predict Better Survival than pTa/Tis/T1?. J Urol 195(4 Pt 1):886–893 PMID: 26521718
Weight CJ, Garcia JA, Hansel DE, Fergany AF, Campbell SC, Gong MC, Jones JS, Klein EA, Dreicer R, Stephenson AJ (2009) Lack of pathologic down-staging with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: a contemporary series. Cancer 115(4):792–799 PMID: 19127557
Van Allen EM, Mouw KW, Kim P, Iyer G, Wagle N, Al-Ahmadie H, Zhu C, Ostrovnaya I, Kryukov GV, O’Connor KW, Sfakianos J, Garcia-Grossman I, Kim J, Guancial EA, Bambury R, Bahl S, Gupta N, Farlow D, Qu A, Signoretti S, Barletta JA, Reuter V, Boehm J, Lawrence M, Getz G, Kantoff P, Bochner BH, Choueiri TK, Bajorin DF, Solit DB, Gabriel S, D’Andrea A, Garraway LA, Rosenberg JE (2014) Somatic ERCC2 mutations correlate with cisplatin sensitivity in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma. Cancer Discov 4:1140–1153 PMID: 25096233
Plimack ER, Dunbrack RL, Brennan TA, Andrake MD, Zhou Y, Serebriiskii IG, Slifker M, Alpaugh K, Dulaimi E, Palma N, Hoffman-Censits J, Bilusic M, Wong YN, Kutikov A, Viterbo R, Greenberg RE, Chen DY, Lallas CD, Trabulsi EJ, Yelensky R, McConkey DJ, Miller VA, Golemis EA, Ross EA et al (2015) Defects in DNA repair genes predict response to neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Eur Urol 68:959–967 PMID: 26238431
Seiler Plimack ER, Dunbrack RL, Brennan TA, Andrake MD, Zhou Y, Serebriiskii IG, Slifker M, Alpaugh K, Dulaimi E, Palma N, Hoffman-Censits J, Bilusic M, Wong YN, Kutikov A, Viterbo R, Greenberg RE, Chen DY, Lallas CD, Trabulsi EJ, Yelensky R, McConkey DJ, Miller VA, Golemis EA, Ross EA (2015) Impact of molecular subtypes in muscle-invasive bladder cancer on predicting response and survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur Urol 68(6):959–967 PMID: 26238431
Liu D, Plimack ER, Hoffman-Censits J, Garraway LA, Bellmunt J, Van Allen E, Rosenberg JE (2016) Clinical validation of chemotherapy response biomarker ERCC2 in muscle-invasive urothelial bladder carcinoma. JAMA Oncol 2:1094–1096 PMID: 27310333
Choi W, Porten S, Kim S, Willis D, Plimack ER, Hoffman-Censits J, Roth B, Cheng T, Tran M, Lee IL, Melquist J, Bondaruk J, Majewski T, Zhang S, Pretzsch S, Baggerly K, Siefker-Radtke A, Czerniak B, Dinney CP, McConkey DJ (2014) Identification of distinct basal and luminal subtypes of muscle-invasive bladder cancer with different sensitivities to frontline chemotherapy. Cancer Cell 25(2):152–165 PMID: 24525232
Dinney CP, Hansel D, McConkey D, Shipley W, Hagan M, Dreicer R, Lerner S, Czerniak B, Waldman F, Groshen S, True LD, Petricoin E, Theodorescu D, Hruszkewycz A, Bajorin D (2014) Novel neoadjuvant therapy paradigms for bladder cancer: results from the national cancer center institute forum. Urol Oncol 32(8):1108–1115
Masood S, Sriprasad S, Palmer JH, Mufti GR (2004) T1G3 bladder cancer—Indications for early cystectomy. Int Urol Nephrol 36(1):41–44 Int Urol Nephrol. 2004;36(1):41-4.PMID: 15338671
Hermans TJN, Voskuilen CS, van der Heijden MS, Schmitz-Dräger BJ, Kassouf W, Seiler R, Kamat AM, Grivas P, Kiltie AE, Black PC, van Rhijn BWG (2017) Neoadjuvant treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: The past, the present, and the future. Urol Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.10.014
Chade DC, Chade DC, Shariat SF, Godoy G, Savage CJ, Cronin AM, Bochner BH, Donat SM, Herr HW, Dalbagni G (2010) Clinical outcomes of primary bladder carcinoma in situ in a contemporary series. J Urol 184(1):74–80 PMID: 20546806
Thomas DE, Kaimakliotis HZ, Rice KR, Pereira JA, Johnston P, Moore ML, Reed A, Cregar DM, Franklin C, Loman RL, Koch MO, Bihrle R, Foster RS, Masterson TA, Gardner TA, Sundaram CP, Powell CR, Beck SDW, Grignon DJ, Cheng L, Albany C, Hahn NM (2017) Prognostic effect of carcinoma in situ in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Clin Genitourin Cancer 15(4):479–486 PMID: 28040424
Parker WP, Ho PL, Melquist JJ, Parker WP, Ho PL, Melquist JJ, Scott K, Holzbeierlein JM, Lopez-Corona E, Kamat AM, Lee EK et al (2015) The effect of concomitant carcinoma in situ on neoadjuvant chemotherapy for urothelial cell carcinoma of the bladder: inferior pathological outcomes but no effect on survival. J Urol 193:1494–1499 PMID: 25451834
Choi W, Ochoa A, McConkey DJ, Aine M, Höglund M, Kim WY, Real FX, Kiltie AE, Milsom I, Dyrskjøt L, Lerner SP, Choi W, Ochoa A, McConkey DJ, Aine M, Höglund M, Kim WY, Real FX, Kiltie AE, Milsom I, Dyrskjøt L, Lerner SP (2017) Genetic alterations in the molecular subtypes of bladder cancer: illustration in the cancer genome atlas dataset. Eur Urol. 72(3):354–365 PMID: 28365159
Knowles MA, Hurst CD (2015) Molecular biology of bladder cancer: new insights into pathogenesis and clinical diversity. Nat Rev Cancer 15(1):25–41. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3817 PMID: 25533674
Dinney CP, McConkey DJ, Millikan RE, Wu X, Bar-Eli M, Adam L, Kamat AM, Siefker-Radtke AO, Tuziak T, Sabichi AL, Grossman HB, Benedict WF, Czerniak B (2004) Focus on bladder cancer. Cancer Cell 6:111–116 PMID: 15324694
Takayanagi A, Masumori N, Takahashi A, Takagi Y, Tsukamoto T (2012) Upper urinary tract recurrence after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: incidence and risk factors. Int J Urol 19(3):229–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2011.02916.x Epub 2011 Nov 28 PMID: 22121922
Volkmer BG, Schnoeller T, Kuefer R, Gust K, Finter F, Hautmann RE (2009) Upper urinary tract recurrence after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer—who is at risk? J Urol 182(6):2632–2637 PMID: 19836794
Kukreja JB, Porten S, Golla V, Ho PL, Noguera-Gonzalez G, Navai N, Kamat AM, Dinney CPN, Shah JB (2017) Absence of tumor on repeat transurethral resection of bladder tumor does not predict final Pathologic T0 stage in bladder cancer treated with radical cystectomy. Eur Urol Focus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2016.12.005
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
NV: protocol/project development, data collection/management, manuscript writing/editing; HZ: data collection/management, data analysis, manuscript writing/editing; JPN: data collection, manuscript writing/editing; RV: data collection, manuscript review; ASF: data collection, manuscript review; LSM: data collection, manuscript review; CPD: data collection, manuscript review; MCM: data collection, manuscript review; LMK: data collection, manuscript review; MSC: data collection, manuscript review; NEJ: data collection, manuscript review; NMG: data collection, manuscript review; JG: data collection, manuscript review; JSM: data collection, manuscript review; EYY: data collection, manuscript review; EX: data collection, manuscript review; NJC: data collection, manuscript review; WK: data collection, manuscript review; MAD: data collection, manuscript review; JAS: data collection, manuscript review; CEE: data collection, manuscript review; SH: data collection, manuscript review; SSS: data collection, manuscript review; JSM: data collection, manuscript review; JA: data collection, manuscript review; SFS: data collection, manuscript review; JLW: data collection, manuscript review; TMM: data collection, manuscript review; TJB: data collection, manuscript review; SN: data collection, manuscript review; DAB: data collection, manuscript review; YL: data collection, manuscript review; PG: data collection, manuscript review; AJS: data collection, manuscript review; JBS: data collection, manuscript review; BWR: data collection, manuscript review; SD: data collection, manuscript review; PES: data collection, manuscript review; JMH: data collection, manuscript review; AT: manuscript writing/editing; PCB: manuscript writing/editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research involving human participants and animals
For this type of study formal consent is not required. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study where applicable.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vasdev, N., Zargar, H., Noël, J.P. et al. Concomitant CIS on TURBT does not impact oncological outcomes in patients treated with neoadjuvant or induction chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy. World J Urol 37, 165–172 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2361-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2361-0