Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Healthcare utilization in men with poorer sexual and urinary function recovery following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Robotic radical prostatectomy focuses on oncologic cure, urinary continence and sexual function recovery. However, little is known about the effect of declines in urinary continence and sexual function on healthcare utilization. We aim to identify these factors.

Materials and methods

From March 2011 to September 2013, all men undergoing robotic prostatectomy within our healthcare system were enrolled. Men completed the expanded prostate cancer index composite-26 survey at the time of diagnosis and 90 days post-operatively. Patients were stratified according to change in scores in the sexual function and urinary incontinence domains. Patient, treatment and post-op utilization patterns were examined for association with the extent of decline in sexual function and urinary continence. Multivariate linear regression was used to identify factors independently associated with decline in continence and sexual function.

Results

A total of 411 men who completed the baseline survey and at 90 days postoperatively were included. On multivariate linear regression, younger age (p < 0.01), higher preoperative sexual function (< 0.01), single marital status (p = 0.04) and more post-surgery email contacts (p = 0.04) were associated with higher declines in sexual function. For continence, no family history of prostate cancer (p = 0.01), higher baseline continence (p < 0.01) and more post-surgery physical therapy visits (p < 0.01) were associated with higher declines.

Conclusions

Patients with the poorest quality of life outcomes at 90 days post-operatively were more likely to seek care via email and physical therapy encounters related to sexual function and urinary incontinence, respectively. This suggests that maximizing post-treatment quality of life can potentially reduce healthcare utilization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

US:

United States

PCa:

Prostate cancer

RALP:

Robotic-assisted robotic prostatectomy

HRQOL:

Healthcare-related quality of life

UI:

Urinary incontinence

SF:

Sexual function

KPSC:

Kaiser Permanente Southern California

EPIC-26:

Expanded Prostate Cancer Index composite 26

BMI:

Body mass index

CCI:

Charlson Comorbidity Index

PDE5i:

Phosphodiesterase-5

EBL:

Estimated blood loss

References

  1. Porter ME (2010) What is value in health care? N Engl J Med 363(26):2477–2481. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1011024

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kural AR, Obek C, Doganca T (2017) Can we accomplish better oncological results with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy? J Endourol 31(S1):S54–S58. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.0585

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Borregales LD, Berg WT, Tal O, Wambi C, Kaufman S, Gaya JM, Urzua C, Badani KK (2013) ‘Trifecta’ after radical prostatectomy: is there a standard definition? BJU Int 112(1):60–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA, Mason M, Metcalfe C, Holding P, Davis M, Peters TJ, Turner EL, Martin RM, Oxley J, Robinson M, Staffurth J, Walsh E, Bollina P, Catto J, Doble A, Doherty A, Gillatt D, Kockelbergh R, Kynaston H, Paul A, Powell P, Prescott S, Rosario DJ, Rowe E, Neal DE, Protec TSG (2016) 10-Year outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 375(15):1415–1424. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1606220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wei JT, Dunn RL, Litwin MS, Sandler HM, Sanda MG (2000) Development and validation of the expanded prostate cancer index composite (EPIC) for comprehensive assessment of health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer. Urology 56(6):899–905

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mabry C (2008) The global surgical package–let’s get the facts straight. J Trauma 64(2):385–387. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e318166e8f4 (discussion 388-9)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mariotto AB, Yabroff KR, Shao Y, Feuer EJ, Brown ML (2011) Projections of the cost of cancer care in the United States: 2010–2020. J Natl Cancer Inst 103(2):117–128. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djq495

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Miller DC, Murtagh DS, Suh RS, Knapp PM, Dunn RL, Montie JE (2010) Establishment of a urological surgery quality collaborative. J Urol 184(6):2485–2490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.08.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chien GW, Slezak JM, Harrison TN, Jung H, Gelfond JS, Zhang C, Wu E, Contreras R, Loo RK, Jacobsen SJ (2017) Health-related quality of life outcomes from a contemporary prostate cancer registry in a large diverse population. BJU Int. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13843

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Punnen S, Cowan JE, Chan JM, Carroll PR, Cooperberg MR (2015) Long-term health-related quality of life after primary treatment for localized prostate cancer: results from the CaPSURE registry. Eur Urol 68(4):600–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.08.074

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mols F, Coebergh JW, van de Poll-Franse LV (2007) Health-related quality of life and health care utilisation among older long-term cancer survivors: a population-based study. Eur J Cancer 43(15):2211–2221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2007.06.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. McKay R, Haider B, Duh MS, Valderrama A, Nakabayashi M, Fiorillo M, Ristovska L, Wen L, Kantoff P (2017) Impact of symptomatic skeletal events on health-care resource utilization and quality of life among patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer and bone metastases. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. https://doi.org/10.1038/pcan.2017.4

    Google Scholar 

  13. Johanson R (2017) Interview with KPSC Billing Department on Cost of Physical Therapy Visits

  14. Kazley AS, Simpson AN, Simpson KN, Teufel R (2014) Association of electronic health records with cost savings in a national sample. Am J Manag Care 20(6):e183–e190

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Reed M, Graetz I, Gordon N, Fung V (2015) Patient-initiated e-mails to providers: associations with out-of-pocket visit costs, and impact on care-seeking and health. Am J Manag Care 21(12):e632–e639

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bergmo TS, Kummervold PE, Gammon D, Dahl LB (2005) Electronic patient-provider communication: will it offset office visits and telephone consultations in primary care? Int J Med Inform 74(9):705–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.06.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shanafelt TD, Dyrbye LN, Sinsky C, Hasan O, Satele D, Sloan J, West CP (2016) Relationship between clerical burden and characteristics of the electronic environment with physician burnout and professional satisfaction. Mayo Clin Proc 91(7):836–848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.05.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Friedberg MW, Chen PG, Van Busum KR, Aunon F, Pham C, Caloyeras J, Mattke S, Pitchforth E, Quigley DD, Brook RH, Crosson FJ, Tutty M (2014) Factors affecting physician professional satisfaction and their implications for patient care, health systems, and health policy. Rand Health Q 3(4):1

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Arndt BG, Beasley JW, Watkinson MD, Temte JL, Tuan WJ, Sinsky CA, Gilchrist VJ (2017) Tethered to the EHR: primary care physician workload assessment using EHR event log data and time-motion observations. Ann Fam Med. 15(5):419–426. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hampson LA, Cowan JE, Zhao S, Carroll PR (2015) Cooperberg MR (2015) Impact of age on quality-of-life outcomes after treatment for localized prostate cancer. Eur Urol 68(3):480–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.01.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Deveci S, Gotto GT, Alex B, O’Brien K, Mulhall JP (2016) A survey of patient expectations regarding sexual function following radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 118(4):641–645. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13398

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Schroeck FR, Krupski TL, Sun L, Albala DM, Price MM, Polascik TJ, Robertson CN, Tewari AK, Moul JW (2008) Satisfaction and regret after open retropubic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 54(4):785–793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2008.06.063

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

PA Elliott: Data collection, manuscript writing/editing. GA Abdelsayed: Data collection, manuscript writing/editing. PS Kilday: Data collection, manuscript writing/editing. BJ Kim: Data collection and management. JN Slezak: Data analysis. GW Chien: Research question, design, data analysis, interpretation, manuscript writing/editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gary W. Chien.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Human and animal participation

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 16 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elliott, P.A., Abdelsayed, G.A., Kilday, P.S. et al. Healthcare utilization in men with poorer sexual and urinary function recovery following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. World J Urol 36, 21–26 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-017-2112-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-017-2112-7

Keywords

Navigation