Skip to main content
Log in

High-dose chemotherapy as salvage treatment in germ-cell cancer: when, in whom and how

  • Topic Paper
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the past two decades, the use of well-validated, guideline-based strategies resulted in high cure rates in patients with germ-cell cancer (GCC) often despite widespread metastatic disease at initial presentation. Yet, about 30 % of patients diagnosed with metastatic disease corresponding to about 5–10 % of GCC patients overall will experience disease progression or recurrence at some time point of their disease with the need for salvage treatment. Salvage treatment is more complex and less well validated than first-line treatment: Its rare patient cohorts are more heterogeneous and prognostic factors impact more compared to other treatment scenarios. In patients with metastatic GCC, there are several scenarios in which first-line treatment strategies can fail (Fig. 1). Prior to initiation of any salvage treatment, several considerations have to be made, which will be addressed in this review: verification that first-line treatment has indeed failed, estimation of the adequacy and the effectiveness of first-line treatment, search for metastatic sites and extent of disease recurrence, assessment of known prognostic factors and finally the choice of the optimal salvage strategy taking into account the aforementioned variables. High-dose chemotherapy will be a rational choice for many patients in need of salvage treatment, but careful patient selection will be required to avoid overtreatment and unnecessary long-term toxicity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beyer J, Albers P, Altena R et al (2013) Maintaining success, reducing treatment burden, focusing on survivorship: highlights from the third European consensus conference on diagnosis and treatment of germ-cell cancer. Ann Oncol 24:878–888

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Beck SDW, Foster RS, Bihrle R et al (2005) Outcome analysis for patients with elevated serum tumor markers at postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. J Clin Oncol 23:6149–6156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rick O, Bokemeyer C, Weinknecht S et al (2004) Residual tumor resection after high-dose chemotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory germ cell cancer. J Clin Oncol 22:3713–3719

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fizazi K, Oldenburg J, Dunant A et al (2008) Assessing prognosis and optimizing treatment in patients with postchemotherapy viable nonseminomatous germ-cell tumors (NSGCT): results of the sCR2 international study. Ann Oncol 19:259–264

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. André F, Fizazi K, Culine S et al (2000) The growing teratoma syndrome: results of therapy and long-term follow-up of 33 patients. Eur J Cancer 36:1389–1394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Oldenburg J, Martin JM, Fossa S (2006) Late relapse of germ cell malignancies: incidence, management and prognosis. J Clin Oncol 24:5503–5511

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Donadio AC, Motzer RJ, Bajorin DF et al (2003) Chemotherapy for teratoma with malignant transformation. J Clin Oncol 21:4285–4291

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Necchi A, Colecchia M, Nicolai N et al (2011) Towards the definition of the best management and prognostic factors of teratoma with malignant transformation: a single institution case series and new proposal. BJU Int 107:1088–1094

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Carver BS (2015) Desperation postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for metastatic germ cell tumors. Urol Clin North Am 42:343–346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Vaena DA, Abonour R, Einhorn LH (2003) Long-term survival after high-dose salvage chemotherapy for germ cell malignancies with adverse prognostic variables. J Clin Oncol 21:4100–4104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Feldman DR, Lorch A, Kramar A et al (2016) Brain metastases in patients with germ cell tumors: prognostic factors and treatment options—an analysis of from the global germ cell cancer group. J Clin Oncol 34:345–351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Albers P, Albrecht W, Algaba F et al (2015) Guidelines on testicular cancer: 2015 update. Eur Urol 68:1054–1068

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Loehrer PJ, Lauer R, Roth BJ et al (1988) Salvage therapy in recurrent germ cell cancer: ifosfamide and cisplatin plus either vinblastine or etoposide. Ann Intern Med 109:540–546

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mead BM, Cullen MH, Huddart R (2005) A phase II trial of TIP (paclitaxel, ifosfamide and cisplatin) given as second-line (post-BEP) salvage chemotherapy for patients with metastatic germ cell cancer: a medical research council trial. Br J Cancer 93:178–184

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Kondagunta GV, Bacik J, Donadio A et al (2005) Combination of paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin is an effective second-line therapy for patients with relapsed testicular germ cell tumors. J Clin Oncol 23:6549–6555

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Einhorn LH, Brames MJ, Juliar P et al (2007) Phase II study of paclitaxel plus gemcitabine salvage chemotherapy for germ cell tumors after progression following high-dose chemotherapy with tandem transplant. J Clin Oncol 25:513–516

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Oechsle K, Kollmannsberger C, Honecker F et al (2011) Long-term survival after treatment with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin with and without paclitaxel plus secondary surgery in patients with cisplatin-refractory and/or multiply relapsed germ cell tumors. Eur Urol 60:850–855

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fizazi K, Gravis G, Flechon A et al (2014) Combining gemcitabine, cisplatin, and ifosfamide (GIP) is active in patients with relapsed metastatic germ-cell tumors (GCT): a prospective multicenter GETUG phase II trial. Ann Oncol 25:987–991

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Necchi A, Nicolai N, Mariani L et al (2014) Combination of paclitaxel, cisplatin, and gemcitabine (TPG) for multiple relapses or platinum-resistant germ cell tumors: long-term outcomes. Clin Genitourin Cancer 12:63–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Beyer J, Schwella N, Zingsem J et al (1995) Hematopoietic rescue after high-dose chemotherapy using autologous peripheral-blood progenitor cells or bone marrow: a randomized comparison. J Clin Oncol 13:1328–1335

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nichols CR, Tricot G, Williams SD et al (1989) Dose-intensive chemotherapy in refractory germ cell cancer—a phase I/II trial of high-dose carboplatin and etoposide with autologous bone marrow transplantation. J Clin Oncol 7:932–939

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Einhorn LH, Williams SD, Chamness A et al (2007) High-dose chemotherapy and stem-cell rescue for metastatic germ-cell tumors. N Engl J Med 357:340–348

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kondagunta GV, Bacik J, Sheinfeld J et al (2007) Paclitaxel plus Ifosfamide followed by high-dose carboplatin plus etoposide in previously treated germ cell tumors. J Clin Oncol 25:85–90

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lorch A, Kollmannsberger C, Hartmann JT et al (2007) Single versus sequential high-dose chemotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory germ cell tumors: a prospective randomized multicenter trial of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol 25:2778–2784

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Selle F, Wittnebel S, Biron P (2014) A phase II trial of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) supported by hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) in germ-cell tumors (GCTs) patients failing cisplatin-based chemotherapy: the multicentric TAXIF II study. Ann Oncol 25:1775–1782

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nieto Y, Tu SM, Bassett R et al (2015) Bevacizumab/high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplant for poor-risk relapsed or refractory germ-cell tumors. Ann Oncol (ahead of print)

  27. Lorch A, Kleinhans A, Kramar A et al (2012) Sequential versus single high-dose chemotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory germ cell tumors: long-term results of a prospective randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 30:800–805

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Beyer J, Stenning S, Gerl A et al (2002) High-dose versus conventional-dose chemotherapy as first-salvage treatment in patients with non-seminomatous germ-cell tumors: a matched-pair analysis. Ann Oncol 13:599–605

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lorch A, Bascoul-Mollevi C, Kramar A et al (2011) Conventional-dose versus high-dose chemotherapy as first salvage treatment in male patients with metastatic germ cell tumors: evidence from a large international database. J Clin Oncol 29:2178–2184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ronnen EA, Kondagunta GV, Bacik J et al (2005) Incidence of late relapse germ cell tumor and outcome to salvage chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 23:6999–7004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sharp DS, Carver BS, Eggener SE et al (2008) Clinical outcome and predictors of survival in late relapse of germ cell tumor. J Clin Oncol 26:5524–5529

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Lorch A, Rick O, Wündisch T et al (2010) High dose chemotherapy as salvage treatment for unresectable late relapse germ cell tumors. J Urol 184:168–173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Pico JL, Rosti G, Kramar A et al (2005) A randomised trial of high-dose chemotherapy in the salvage treatment of patients failing first-line platinum chemotherapy for advanced germ cell tumours. Ann Oncol 16:1152–1159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Feldman DR, Huddart R, Hall E, Beyer J, Powles T (2011) Is high dose therapy superior to conventional dose therapy as initial treatment for relapsed germ cell tumors? The TIGER trial. J Cancer 2:374–377

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. The International Prognostic Factors Study Group (2010) Prognostic factors in patients with metastatic germ cell tumors who experienced treatment failure with cisplatin-based first-line chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 28:4906–4911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lorch A, Neubauer A, Hackenthal M et al (2010) High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) as second-salvage treatment in patients with multiple relapsed or refractory germ-cell tumors. Ann Oncol 21:820–825

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors’ contribution

Protocol/project development does not apply. Data collection or management does not apply. Data analysis does not apply. Anja Lorch and Jörg Beyer wrote, edited and approved the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jörg Beyer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors Anja Lorch and Jörg Beyer have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standards

This work has not been submitted or published elsewhere.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lorch, A., Beyer, J. High-dose chemotherapy as salvage treatment in germ-cell cancer: when, in whom and how. World J Urol 35, 1177–1184 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-016-1941-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-016-1941-0

Keywords

Navigation