Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fifteen-year single-centre experience with three different surgical procedures of nerve-sparing cystectomy in selected organ-confined bladder cancer patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate technical feasibility and oncologic and functional outcomes of three different surgical procedures of nerve-sparing radical cystectomy (NS-RC) for the treatment of organ-confined bladder cancer at a single referral centre.

Materials and methods

All consecutive cases of NS-RC carried out between 1997 and 2012 were retrospectively analysed. NS-RC included nerve-sparing cysto-vesicleprostatectomy (NS-CVP), capsule-sparing cystectomy (CS-C) and seminal-sparing cysto-prostatectomy (SS-CP). Peri-operative parameters and post-operative outcomes were analysed.

Results

Overall, 90 patients underwent NS-RC, 35 (38.9 %) of whom received a NS-CVP, while 36 (40 %) and 19 (21.1 %) underwent capsule CS-C and SS-CP, respectively. No difference was registered comparing oncologic outcomes of the three different techniques; however, two local recurrences after CS-C were attributed to the surgical technique. Complete post-operative daytime and night-time urinary continence (UC) at 24 and 48 months was achieved in 94.4 and 74.4 % and in 88.8 and 84.4 % of cases, respectively. CS-C showed both the best UC and sexual function preservation rate at early follow-up (24 months). Overall, a satisfactory post-operative erectile function (IIEF-5 ≥ 22) was proved in 57 (68.6 %) and 54 (65.0 %) patients at 24 and 48 months, respectively. Significant difference was found when comparing sexual function preservation rate of NS-CVP (28.5 %) to that of CS-C (91.6 %) and SS-CP (84.2 %).

Conclusion

NS-RC for male patients accounted for 7.4 % of overall radical cystectomy. To a limited extent of the selected organ-confined bladder cancers treated, the three different procedures analysed showed comparable results in terms of local recurrence and cancer-specific survival. Both CS-C and SS-CP procedures provided excellent functional outcomes when compared to original NS-CVP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Madersbacher S, Möhrle K, Burkhard F, Studer UE (2002) Long-term voiding pattern of patients with ileal orthotopic bladder substitutes. J Urol 167:2052–2057

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahmadi H et al (2013) Urinary functional outcome following radical cystoprostatectomy and ileal neobladder reconstruction in male patients. J Urol 189:1782–1788

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nordström GM, Nyman CR (1992) Male and female sexual function and activity following ileal conduit urinary diversion. Br J Urol 70:33–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Miranda-Sousa AJ, Davila HH, Lockhart JL, Ordorica RC, Carrion RE (2006) Sexual function after surgery for prostate or bladder cancer. Cancer Control 13:179–187

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Walsh PC, Schlegel PN (1988) Radical pelvic surgery with preservation of sexual function. Ann Surg 208:391–400

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schlegel PN, Walsh PC (1987) Neuroanatomical approach to radical cystoprostatectomy with preservation of sexual function. J Urol 138:1402–1406

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pritchett TR, Schiff WM, Klatt E, Lieskovsky G, Skinner DG (1988) The potency-sparing radical cystectomy: does it compromise the completeness of the cancer resection? J Urol 140:1400–1403

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Colombo R et al (2004) Overall clinical outcomes after nerve and seminal sparing radical cystectomy for the treatment of organ confined bladder cancer. J Urol 171:1819–1822

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Guazzoni G et al (2003) Laparoscopic nerve- and seminal-sparing cystectomy with orthotopic ileal neobladder: the first three cases. Eur Urol 44:567–572

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Puppo P, Introini C, Bertolotto F, Naselli A (2008) Potency preserving cystectomy with intrafascial prostatectomy for high risk superficial bladder cancer. J Urol 179:1727–1732

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ong CH, Schmitt M, Thalmann GN, Studer UE (2010) Individualized seminal vesicle sparing cystoprostatectomy combined with ileal orthotopic bladder substitution achieves good functional results. J Urol 183:1337–1341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hautmann RE, Hautmann O, Volkmer BG, Hautmann S (2010) Nerve-sparing radical cystectomy: a new technique. Eur Urol Suppl 9:428–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Miller K, Wenderoth UK, de Petriconi R, Kleinschmidt K, Hautmann R (1991) The ileal neobladder. Operative technique and results. Urol Clin North Am 18:623–630

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Beloosesky Y, Weiss A, Mansur N (2011) Validity of the medication-based disease burden index compared with the Charlson comorbidity index and the cumulative illness rating scale for geriatrics: a cohort study. Drugs Aging 28:1007–1014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rosen RC, Cappelleri JC, Smith MD, Lipsky J, Peña BM (1999) Development and evaluation of an abridged, 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool for erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res 11:319–326

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Horenblas S, Meinhardt W, Ijzerman W, Moonen LF (2001) Sexuality preserving cystectomy and neobladder: initial results. J Urol 166:837–840

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tal R, Baniel J (2005) Sexual function-preserving cystectomy. Urology 66:235–241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kefer JC, Campbell SC (2008) Current status of prostate-sparing cystectomy. Urol Oncol 26:486–493

  19. Hautmann RE, Stein JP (2005) Neobladder with prostatic capsule and seminal-sparing cystectomy for bladder cancer: a step in the wrong direction. Urol Clin North Am 32:177–185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Stein JP, Hautmann RE, Penson D, Skinner DG (2009) Prostate-sparing cystectomy: a review of the oncologic and functional outcomes. Contraindicated in patients with bladder cancer. Urol Oncol 27(5):466–472

  21. Mertens LS et al (2014) Prostate sparing cystectomy for bladder cancer: 20-year single center experience. J Urol 191:1250–1255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Muto G, Bardari F, D’Urso L, Giona C (2004) Seminal sparing cystectomy and ileocapsuloplasty: long-term followup results. J Urol 172:76–80

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Macek P et al (2013) Prostate-sparing radical cystectomy for selected patients with bladder cancer. Urol Int 91:89–96

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ficarra V et al (2005) Correlation between clinical and pathological staging in a series of radical cystectomies for bladder carcinoma. BJU Int 95:786–790

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Abdollah F et al (2012) Development and validation of a reference table for prediction of postoperative mortality rate in patients treated with radical cystectomy: a population-based study. Ann Surg Oncol 19:309–317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Terrone C, Cracco C, Scarpa RM, Rossetti SR (2004) Supra-ampullar cystectomy with preservation of sexual function and ileal orthotopic reservoir for bladder tumor: twenty years of experience. Eur Urol 46:264–269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Klotz L (2009) Prostate capsule sparing radical cystectomy: oncologic safety and clinical outcome. Ther Adv Urol 1:43–50

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Martis G, D’Elia G, Diana M, Ombres M, Mastrangeli B (2005) Prostatic capsule- and nerve-sparing cystectomy in organ-confined bladder cancer: preliminary results. World J Surg 29:1277–1281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. De Vries RR et al (2009) Prostate-sparing cystectomy: long-term oncological results. BJU Int 104:1239–1243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jacobs BL et al (2014) Prostate capsule sparing versus nerve sparing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: results from a randomized controlled trial. J Urol. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.090

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standard

All participants gave their informed consent to use their data for this retrospective study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Moschini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Colombo, R., Pellucchi, F., Moschini, M. et al. Fifteen-year single-centre experience with three different surgical procedures of nerve-sparing cystectomy in selected organ-confined bladder cancer patients. World J Urol 33, 1389–1395 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1482-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1482-y

Keywords

Navigation