Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Analysis of the pentafecta learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) has a long learning curve; however, little is known about the pentafecta learning curve for LRP. We analysed the learning curve for a fellowship trained surgeon with regard to the pentafecta with up to 6-year follow-up.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed in 550 cases, by dividing these cases into 11 groups of 50 patients. Outcomes analysed were the following: (1) the pentafecta (complication rate, positive surgical margin (PSM) rate, continence, potency and biochemical recurrence); (2) operative time and blood loss; and (3) overall pentafecta attainment.

Results

The mean complication rate for the entire series was 9 %; this plateaued after 150 cases. The overall PSM rate for the series was 23.5 %, 16.3 % for pT2 and 40.5 % for pT3. PSM plateaued after 200 cases. Excluding the first 100 cases, the overall PSM rate for pT2 was 10.9 % and 37.8 % for pT3. The continence rate stabilised after approximately 250 cases. The rate of male sling/artificial urinary sphincter plateaued after 200 cases. The potency learning curve continues to improve after 250 cases of nerve-sparing (ns) endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE) as does the pentafecta learning curve which closely follows the pattern of the potency learning curve. The last group of nsEERPE achieved pentafecta in 63 %.

Conclusion

This study shows multiple learning curves: an initial for peri-operative outcomes, then stabilisation of oncologic outcomes and the final for stabilisation of functional outcomes. In this series over 250 cases were required to achieve the learning curve.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Office of National Statistics 2012 Available from: http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/search/index.html?newquery=cancer+registrations

  2. Heidenreich A, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Joniau S, Mason M, Matveev V et al (2011) EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease. Eur Urol 59(1):61–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rassweiler J, Stolzenburg J, Sulser T, Deger S, Zumbe J, Hofmockel G et al (2006) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy—the experience of the German laparoscopic working Group. Eur Urol 49(1):113–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W, Cestari A, Galfano A, Graefen M et al (2009) Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol 55(5):1037–1063

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Laird ASG, Fowler S, McNeill SA (2012) The UK radical prostatectomy audit 2011. BJU Int 109(Supp 7):3

    Google Scholar 

  6. Patel VR, Sivaraman A, Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Palmer KJ, Orvieto MA et al (2011) Pentafecta: a new concept for reporting outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 59(5):702–707

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vasdev N, Kass-Iliyya A, Patel A, Bedford G, O’Riordon A, Johnson MI et al (2012) Developing a laparoscopic radical prostatectomy service: defining the learning curve. J Endourol 26(7):903–910

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Secin FP, Savage C, Abbou C, de La Taille A, Salomon L, Rassweiler J et al (2010) The learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: an international multicenter study. J Urol 184(6):2291–2296

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Eden CG, Neill MG, Louie-Johnsun MW (2009) The first 1,000 cases of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in the UK: evidence of multiple ‘learning curves’. BJU Int 103(9):1224–1230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Stolzenburg JUSH, Bhanot SM, Rabenalt R, Do M, Truss M, Ho K, Anderson C (2005) Modular surgical training for endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 96(7):1022–1027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Stolzenburg JURR, Do M, Schwalenberg T, Winkler M, Dietel A, Liatsikos E (2008) Intrafascial nerve-sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 53(5):931–940

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tewari AK, Ali A, Metgud S, Theckumparampil N, Srivastava A, Khani F et al (2013) Functional outcomes following robotic prostatectomy using athermal, traction free risk-stratified grades of nerve sparing. World J Urol 31(3):471–480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Stolzenburg JU, Kallidonis P, Minh D, Dietel A, Hafner T, Dimitriou D et al (2009) Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: evolution of the technique and experience with 2,400 cases. J Endourol 23(9):1467–1472

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dindo DDN, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6,336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Ghavamian R, Schenk G, Hoenig DM, Williot P, Melman A (2004) Overcoming the steep learning curve of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: single-surgeon experience. J Endourol 18(6):567–571

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Poulakis V, Dillenburg W, Moeckel M, de Vries R, Witzsch U, Zumbe J et al (2005) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: prospective evaluation of the learning curve. Eur Urol 47(2):167–175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hellawell GO, Moon DA (2008) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: reducing the learning curve. Urology 72(6):1347–1350

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sultan MF, Merrilees AD, Chabert CC, Eden CG (2009) Blood loss during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 23(4):635–638

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hruza M, Weiss HO, Pini G, Goezen AS, Schulze M, Teber D et al (2010) Complications in 2,200 consecutive laparoscopic radical prostatectomies: standardised evaluation and analysis of learning curves. Eur Urol 58(5):733–741

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rodriguez AR, Rachna K, Pow-Sang JM (2010) Laparoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: impact of the learning curve on perioperative outcomes and margin status. JSLS 14(1):6–13

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Vickers AJ, Savage CJ, Hruza M, Tuerk I, Koenig P, Martinez-Pineiro L et al (2009) The surgical learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 10(5):475–480

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Nicolosi A, Buvat J, Glasser DB, Hartmann U, Laumann EO, Gingell C (2006) Sexual behaviour, sexual dysfunctions and related help seeking patterns in middle-aged and elderly Europeans: the global study of sexual attitudes and behaviors. World J Urol 24(4):423–428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Asimakopoulos AD, Miano R, Di Lorenzo N, Spera E, Vespasiani G, Mugnier C (2013) Laparoscopic versus robot-assisted bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: comparison of pentafecta rates for a single surgeon. Surg Endosc 27(11):4297–4304

    Google Scholar 

  24. Huang JL, Ma LL, Huang Y, Hou XF, Wang GL, Hong K et al (2012) Postoperative urinary continence and learning curve after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao 44(4):563–567

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sammon JD, Karakiewicz PI, Sun M, Sukumar S, Ravi P, Ghani KR, Bianchi M, Peabody JO, Shariat SF, Perrotte P, Hu JC, Menon M, Trinh QD (2013) Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: the differential effect of regionalization, procedure volume and operative approach. J Urol 189(4):1289–1294

    Google Scholar 

  26. Brown JA, Sajadi KP (2009) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 6 months of fellowship training doesn’t prevent the learning curve when incorporating into a lower volume practice. Urol Oncol 27(2):144–148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Stolzenburg JU, Rabenalt R, Do M, Horn LC, Liatsikos EN (2006) Modular training for residents with no prior experience with open pelvic surgery in endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 49(3):491–498 discussion 9–500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mirheydar HS, Parsons JK (2012) Diffusion of robotics into clinical practice in the United States: process, patient safety, learning curves, and the public health. World J Urol 31(3):455–461

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, Western General Hospital, NHS Lothian, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, EH2 4XU, UK

    D. W. Good, G. D. Stewart & S. A. McNeill

  2. Edinburgh Urological Cancer Group, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK

    D. W. Good, G. D. Stewart & S. A. McNeill

  3. Department of Urology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany

    J. U. Stolzenburg

Authors
  1. D. W. Good
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. D. Stewart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. U. Stolzenburg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S. A. McNeill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. W. Good.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Good, D.W., Stewart, G.D., Stolzenburg, J.U. et al. Analysis of the pentafecta learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. World J Urol 32, 1225–1233 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-013-1198-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-013-1198-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation