Abstract
Introduction
This review explores the treatment of male chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) (i.e., chronic prostatitis) through the use of neuromodulation, which is the electrical stimulation of the nervous system. Neuromodulation has been used for the treatment of chronic pain for decades, and this review will examine the theory and use of neuromodulation and the various techniques available for the treatment of CPPS.
Methods
Existing literature on the use of neuromodulation of the pelvic nerves for the treatment of chronic urogenital pelvic pain was reviewed. Because of limited published research, much of the data are not explicitly for male CPPS.
Results
Neuromodulation techniques used for chronic pelvic pain conditions include SNS, PTNS and pudendal nerve stimulation. Only SNS and PTNS are currently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of urinary symptoms, and none of these methods are acknowledged as standard therapies for treating chronic pelvic pain syndromes. The improvement of urinary symptoms is more clearly defined than improvements in pain, but at least a subset of patients in most of the published studies and case series derive some benefit in the short term and limited evidence suggests that long-term improvement of symptoms is possible. However, explantation rates are high in all long-term series of patients receiving implantable neuromodulation devices.
Conclusions
Neuromodulation appears to provide benefits for patients with CPPS. However, because of the paucity of data and the limitations of small studies, the conclusions of the existing literature must be carefully considered. Because we are still becoming familiar with the pathophysiology of the pain syndromes and the mechanism of neuromodulation on urinary and pain symptoms, we cannot yet predict a particular individual’s response to neuromodulation. To determine the long-term efficacy of this therapy, more clinical study is needed to explore the use of neuromodulation in the treatment of male CPPS.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Landau B, Levy RM (1993) Neuromodulation techniques for medically refractory chronic pain. Annu Rev Med 44:279–287
Rushton DN (2002) Electrical stimulation in the treatment of pain. Disabil Rehabil 24:407–415
Hellstrom WJ, Schmidt RA, Lue TF et al (1987) Neuromuscular dysfunction in nonbacterial prostatitis. Urology 30:183–188
Kane K, Taub A (1975) A history of local electrical analgesia. Pain 1:125–138
Melzack R, Wall PD (1965) Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Science 150:971–979
Dasgupta R, Critchley HD, Dolan RJ et al (2005) Changes in brain activity following sacral neuromodulation for urinary retention. J Urol 174:2268–2272
Schmidt RA, Senn E, Tanagho EA (1990) Functional evaluation of sacral nerve root integrity. Report of a technique. Urology 35:388–392
Schmidt RA, Jonas U, Oleson KA et al (1999) Sacral nerve stimulation for treatment of refractory urinary urge incontinence. Sacral nerve stimulation study group. J Urol 162:352–357
Fall M, Carlsson CA, Erlandson BE (1980) Electrical stimulation in interstitial cystitis. J Urol 123:192–195
Siegel S, Paszkiewicz E, Kirkpatrick C et al (2001) Sacral nerve stimulation in patients with chronic intractable pelvic pain. J Urol 166:1742–1745
Feler CA, Whitworth LA, Fernandez J (2003) Sacral neuromodulation for chronic pain conditions. Anesthesiol Clin N Am 21:785–795
Zabihi N, Mourtzinos A, Maher MG et al (2008) Short-term results of bilateral S2–S4 sacral neuromodulation for the treatment of refractory interstitial cystitis, painful bladder syndrome, and chronic pelvic pain. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19:553–557
Comiter CV (2003) Sacral neuromodulation for the symptomatic treatment of refractory interstitial cystitis: a prospective study. J Urol 169:1369–1373
Everaert K, Devulder J, De Muynck M et al (2001) The pain cycle: implications for the diagnosis and treatment of pelvic pain syndromes. Int Urogynecol J 12:9–14
Marinkovic SP, Gillen LM, Marinkovic CM (2011) Minimum 6-year outcomes for interstitial cystitis treated with sacral neuromodulation. Int Urogynecol J 22:407–412
Gajewski JB, Al-Zahrani AA (2011) The long-term efficacy of sacral neuromodulation in the management of intractable cases of bladder pain syndrome: 14 years of experience in one centre. BJU Int 107:1258–1264
Powell CR, Kreder KJ (2010) Long-term outcomes of urgency-frequency syndrome due to painful bladder syndrome treated with sacral neuromodulation and analysis of failures. J Urol 183:173–176
Galloway NT, Gabale DR, Irwin PP (1991) Interstitial cystitis or reflex sympathetic dystrophy of the bladder? Semin Urol 9:148–153
Yang CC, Lee JC, Kromm BG et al (2003) Pain sensitization in male chronic pelvic pain syndrome: why are symptoms so difficult to treat? J Urol 170:823–826 Discussion 826–827
Hunter C, Dave N, Diwan S et al (2013) Neuromodulation of pelvic visceral pain: review of the literature and case series of potential novel targets for treatment. Pain Pract 13(1):3–17
Kim SW, Paick JS, Ku JH (2007) Percutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation in patients with chronic pelvic pain: a preliminary study. Urol Int 78:58–62
Biemans JM, van Balken MR (2013) Efficacy and effectiveness of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in the treatment of pelvic organ disorders: a systematic review. Neuromodulation 16(1):25–33
Kabay S, Kabay SC, Yucel M et al (2009) Efficiency of posterior tibial nerve stimulation in category IIIB chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain: a sham-controlled comparative study. Urol Int 83:33–38
Staskin DR, Peters KM, MacDiarmid S et al (2012) Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation: a clinically and cost effective addition to the overactive bladder algorithm of care. Curr Urol Rep 13:327–334
Peters KM, Feber KM, Bennett RC (2007) A prospective, single-blind, randomized crossover trial of sacral vs pudendal nerve stimulation for interstitial cystitis. BJU Int 100:835–839
Rowe E, Smith C, Laverick L et al (2005) A prospective, randomized, placebo controlled, double-blind study of pelvic electromagnetic therapy for the treatment of chronic pelvic pain syndrome with 1 year of followup. J Urol 173:2044–2047
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, C.C. Neuromodulation in male chronic pelvic pain syndrome: rationale and practice. World J Urol 31, 767–772 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-013-1066-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-013-1066-7