Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prediction of perioperative outcomes following minimally invasive partial nephrectomy: role of the R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Objective characterization of renal mass anatomy facilitates treatment selection and prediction of surgical outcomes. We investigated R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score (NS) efficacy in predicting outcomes after minimally invasive nephron-sparing surgery (MINSS).

Methods

A total of 250 patients with 252 renal masses underwent MINSS by a surgeon between January 2003 and July 2011. Preoperative films were available for 181 (72 %) renal masses, which were retrospectively assigned a NS. NS was categorized as low, moderate or high, reflecting tumor complexity. Perioperative outcomes were analyzed by NS category. Outcomes for laparoscopic (LPN) versus robotic (RALPN) partial nephrectomy were compared. Multivariable regression was used to investigate predictors of postoperative complications.

Results

Among 181 renal masses, 128 (71 %) were managed by LPN and 53 were (29 %) by RALPN. And 103, 74 and 4 renal lesions were low, medium and high complexity, respectively. For low versus medium versus high NS, respective overall complication rate was 5.8 versus 16.0 versus 50.0 % (p = 0.01); mean warm ischemia time (WIT) was 29 versus 33 versus 39 min (p = 0.02); and transfusion rate was 5/103 (4.8 %) versus 6/74 (8.1 %) versus 1/4 (25 %) (p = 0.20). NS category was significantly associated with overall complication rate (p = 0.04) and Clavien grade III complication rate (p = 0.05). Nearness to the collecting system (“N”) was significantly associated with overall complications (p = 0.02) and postoperative hemorrhage (p = 0.02). Postoperative outcomes for LPN versus RALPN were statistically similar across all categories.

Conclusions

R.E.N.A.L NS is predictive of overall complications and WIT during MINSS. Our data also suggest that “N” score may be used as a single predictor of overall complications and postoperative hemorrhage following MINSS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thompson RH, Boorjian SA, Lohse CM et al (2008) Radical nephrectomy for pT1a renal masses may be associated with decreased overall survival compared with partial nephrectomy. J Urol 179:468–471 (discussion 472–463)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Simmons MN, Gill IS (2007) Decreased complications of contemporary laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: use of a standardized reporting system. J Urol 177:2067–2073 (discussion 2073)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Scoll BJ, Uzzo RG, Chen DY et al (2010) Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a large single-institutional experience. Urology 75:1328–1334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gill IS, Kamoi K, Aron M et al (2010) 800 Laparoscopic partial nephrectomies: a single surgeon series. J Urol 183:34–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Porpiglia F, Fiori C, Piechaud T et al (2010) Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for large renal masses: results of a European survey. World J Urol 28:525–529

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kutikov A, Uzzo RG (2009) The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol 182:844–853

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Weight CJ, Atwell TD, Fazzio RT et al (2011) A multidisciplinary evaluation of inter-reviewer agreement of the nephrometry score and the prediction of long-term outcomes. J Urol 186:1223–1228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Simhan J, Smaldone MC, Tsai KJ et al (2011) Objective measures of renal mass anatomic complexity predict rates of major complications following partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 60:724–730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rosevear HM, Gellhaus PT, Lightfoot AJ et al (2011) Utility of the RENAL nephrometry scoring system in the real world: predicting surgeon operative preference and complication risk. BJU Int 109:700–705

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hayn MH, Schwaab T, Underwood W et al (2011) RENAL nephrometry score predicts surgical outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. BJU Int 108:876–881

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mufarrij PW, Krane LS, Rajamahanty S et al (2011) Does nephrometry scoring of renal tumors predict outcomes in patients selected for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy? J Endourol/Endourol Soc 25:1649–1653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Huang WC, Levey AS, Serio AM et al (2006) Chronic kidney disease after nephrectomy in patients with renal cortical tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 7:735–740

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Olweny EO, Park SK, Seideman CA et al (2011) Self-retaining barbed suture for parenchymal repair during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy; initial clinical experience. BJU Int 109:906–909

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wheat JC, Roberts WW, Hollenbeck BK et al (2011) Complications of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Urol Oncol. doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.11.003

  16. Kunkle DA, Crispen PL, Li T et al (2007) Tumor size predicts synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma: implications for surveillance of small renal masses. J Urol 177:1692–1696 (discussion 1697)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kutikov A, Smaldone MC, Egleston BL et al (2011) Anatomic features of enhancing renal masses predict malignant and high-grade pathology: a preoperative nomogram using the RENAL nephrometry score. Eur Urol 60:241–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Porpiglia F, Volpe A, Billia M et al (2008) Assessment of risk factors for complications of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 53:590–596

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Campbell SC, Novick AC, Belldegrun A et al (2009) Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass. J Urol 182:1271–1279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Turna B, Frota R, Kamoi K et al (2008) Risk factor analysis of postoperative complications in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Urol 179:1289–1294 (discussion 1294–1285)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bruner B, Breau RH, Lohse CM et al (2011) Renal nephrometry score is associated with urine leak after partial nephrectomy. BJU Int 108:67–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Desai MM, Gill IS, Ramani AP et al (2005) The impact of warm ischaemia on renal function after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. BJU Int 95:377–383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Choi JD, Park JW, Choi JY et al (2010) Renal damage caused by warm ischaemia during laparoscopic and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: an assessment using Tc 99 m-DTPA glomerular filtration rate. Eur Urol 58:900–905

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Derweesh IH, Novick AC (2005) Mechanisms of renal ischaemic injury and their clinical impact. BJU Int 95:948–950

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Cha EK, Ng CK, Jeun B et al (2011) Preoperative radiographic parameters predict long-term renal impairment following partial nephrectomy. World J Urol. doi:10.1007/s00345-011-0694-z

  26. Pierorazio PM, Patel HD, Feng T et al (2011) Robotic-assisted versus traditional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison of outcomes and evaluation of learning curve. Urology 78:813–819

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Haseebuddin M, Benway BM, Cabello JM et al (2010) Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: evaluation of learning curve for an experienced renal surgeon. J Endourol/Endourol Soc 24:57–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mottrie A, De Naeyer G, Schatteman P et al (2010) Impact of the learning curve on perioperative outcomes in patients who underwent robotic partial nephrectomy for parenchymal renal tumours. Eur Urol 58:127–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kolla SB, Spiess PE, Sexton WJ (2011) Interobserver reliability of the RENAL nephrometry scoring system. Urology 78:592–594

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Montag S, Rais-Bahrami S, Seideman CA et al (2011) Delayed haemorrhage after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: frequency and angiographic findings. BJU Int 107:1460–1466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey A. Cadeddu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, ZW., Olweny, E.O., Yin, G. et al. Prediction of perioperative outcomes following minimally invasive partial nephrectomy: role of the R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score. World J Urol 31, 1183–1189 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-012-0876-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-012-0876-3

Keywords

Navigation