Abstract
Purpose
This study aimed to identify non-neoplastic pathologic changes in partial nephrectomy specimens of patients without a known history of medical comorbidities. Routine analysis of this tissue may allow the clinician to identify subclinical renal disease.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed our database of patients who underwent open partial nephrectomy for a small renal mass. Non-neoplastic tissue of partial nephrectomy specimens of patients without a known history of chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, or coronary artery disease was evaluated for glomerular, interstitial, and vascular pathologic changes.
Results
A rim of non-neoplastic tissue was adequate for pathologic evaluation in 91.8% of specimens. A total of 45 patients were studied with a median age of 52.0 years. Atherosclerosis was the most commonly identified pathologic finding in 9 (20%) patients, followed by mesangial expansion and interstitial fibrosis, each found in 8 (17.8%) patients. Linear regression found interstitial fibrosis to be the only pathologic lesion associated with preoperative serum creatinine (coefficient = 0.697, P = 0.001). Male gender was also associated with a higher preoperative creatinine (coefficient = 0.270, P = 0.034). Postoperative serum creatinine was not associated with any of the examined lesions.
Conclusions
Current surgical techniques provide adequate non-neoplastic tissue for pathologic evaluation. We observed a striking degree of pathologic disease in patients without a known history of medical comorbidities. Routine inspection of the non-neoplastic parenchyma of partial nephrectomy specimens should be performed as it can alert the clinician to presence subclinical renal disease allowing for medical intervention.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chow WH, Devesa SS, Warren JL, Fraumeni JF Jr (1999) Rising incidence of renal cell cancer in the United States. JAMA 281:1628–1631
Lipworth L, Tarone RE, McLaughlin JK (2006) The epidemiology of renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 176:2353–2358
Campbell SC, Novick AC, Belldegrun A, Blute ML, Chow GK, Derweesh IH, Faraday MM, Kaouk JH, Leveillee RJ, Matin SF, Russo P, Uzzo RG, Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Urological Association (2009) Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass. J Urol 182:1271–1279
Ljungberg B, Cowan NC, Hanbury DC, Hora M, Kuczyk MA, Merseburger AS, Patard JJ, Mulders PF, Sinescu IC, European Association of Urology Guideline Group (2010) EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2010 update. Eur Urol 58:398–406
McKiernan J, Simmons R, Katz J, Russo P (2002) Natural history of chronic renal insufficiency after partial and radical nephrectomy. Urology 59:816–820
Hollenbeck BK, Taub DA, Miller DC, Dunn RL, Wei JT (2006) National utilization trends of partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a case of underutilization? Urology 67:254–259
Becker F, Van Poppel H, Hakenberg OW, Stief C, Gill I, Guazzoni G, Montorsi F, Russo P, Stockle M (2009) Assessing the impact of ischaemia time during partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 56:625–634
Srigley JR, Amin MB, Delahunt B, Campbell SC, Chang A, Grignon DJ, Humphrey PA, Leibovich BC, Montironi R, Renshaw AA, Reuter VE, Members of the Cancer Committee, College of American Pathologists (2010) Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with invasive carcinoma of renal tubular origin. Arch Pathol Lab Med 134:e25–30
Bijol V, Mendez GP, Hurwitz S, Rennke HG, Nose V (2006) Evaluation of the nonneoplastic pathology in tumor nephrectomy specimens: predicting the risk of progressive renal failure. Am J Surg Pathol 30:575–584
Henriksen KJ, Meehan SM, Chang A (2007) Non-neoplastic renal diseases are often unrecognized in adult tumor nephrectomy specimens: a review of 246 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 31:1703–1708
Kava BR, De Los Santos R, Ayyathurai R, Shirodkar S, Manoharan M, Leveillee R, Bird V, Ciancio G, Soloway MS (2010) Contemporary open partial nephrectomy is associated with diminished procedure-specific morbidity despite increasing technical challenges: a single institutional experience. World J Urol 28:507–512
Castilla EA, Liou LS, Abrahams NA, Fergany A, Rybicki LA, Myles J, Novick AC (2002) Prognostic importance of resection margin width after nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma. Urology 60:993–997
Piper NY, Bishoff JT, Magee C, Haffron JM, Flanigan RC, Mintiens A, Van Poppel HP, Thompson IM, Harmon WJ (2001) Is a 1-CM margin necessary during nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma? Urology 58:849–852
Eddy AA (2005) Progression in chronic kidney disease. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 12:353–365
Remuzzi G, Benigni A, Remuzzi A (2006) Mechanisms of progression and regression of renal lesions of chronic nephropathies and diabetes. J Clin Invest 116:288–296
Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology (2003) ADASP Checklists and Guidelines for Surgical Pathology Reportsof Malignant Neoplasms: Renal Tubular. http://www.adasp.org/Checklists/checklists/RENAL%20TUBULAR%20-%20CHECKLIST%20-%20v1.1.pdf. Accessed 25 May 2011
Ishidoya S, Morrissey J, McCracken R, Klahr S (1996) Delayed treatment with enalapril halts tubulointerstitial fibrosis in rats with obstructive nephropathy. Kidney Int 49:1110–1119
Zoja C, Corna D, Camozzi D, Cattaneo D, Rottoli D, Batani C, Zanchi C, Abbate M, Remuzzi G (2002) How to fully protect the kidney in a severe model of progressive nephropathy: a multidrug approach. J Am Soc Nephrol 13:2898–2908
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Garcia-Roig, M., Gorin, M.A., Parra-Herran, C. et al. Pathologic evaluation of non-neoplastic renal parenchyma in partial nephrectomy specimens. World J Urol 31, 835–839 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-011-0720-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-011-0720-1