Abstract
Introduction
An evidence-based approach to the practice of urology relies on the accumulation of a body of evidence from clinical research. Ethical publishing has a major role to play in building confidence in the compiled evidence, which can lead to the development of clinical practice guidelines and new treatment paradigms.
Methods
The literature on the recent developments in ethical publishing was reviewed to highlight how this supported the promotion of the evidence-based practice of urology.
Conclusion
The requirements for complete and transparent reporting of results, the honest and full declaration of conflicts of interest, and the correct assignment of authorship are essential to build up confidence in the evidence-based practice of urology. Increasing the quality of the reporting of trials allows the evidence base to be scrutinized and validated. Reporting the experience and expertise of authors in compiling, analysing and interpreting evidence also helps to develop this trust. A great deal of progress has been made in the recent years, but there is a lot more work to be done.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Claridge JA, Fabian TC (2005) History and development of evidence-based medicine. World J Surg 29:547–553
Evidence-based Medicine Working Group (1992) Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA 268:2420–2425
Herr HW (2009) Civiale, stones and statistics: the dawn of evidence-based medicine. BJUI 104:300–302
Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Grimes DA, Altman DG (1994) Assessing the quality of randomization from reports of controlled trials published in obstetrics and gynecology journals. JAMA 272:125–128
Pocock SJ, Hughes MD, Lee RJ (1987) Statistical problems in the reporting of clinical trials. A survey of three medical journals. N Engl J Med 317:426–432
Altman DG, Doré CJ (1990) Randomisation and baseline comparisons in clinical trials. Lancet 335:149–153
Breau RH, Gaboury I, Scales CD Jr, Fesperman SF, Watterson JD, Dahm P (2010) Reporting of harm in randomized controlled trials published in the urological literaure. J Urol 183(5):1693–1697
Tseng TY, Stoffs TL, Dahm P (2010) Evidence-based urology in practice: publication bias. BJUI 106:318–320
Hopewell S, Loudon K, Clarke MJ, Oxman AD, Dickersin K (2009) Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 1. Art. No.: MR000006. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000006.pub3
Graf C, Battisti WP, Bridges D et al (2009) Good publication practice for communicating company sponsored medical research: the GPP2 guidelines. BMJ 339:b4330
Singapore Statement on Research Integrity (2011) http://www.singaporestatement.org/index.html. Accessed on 2 Feb 2011
Wager E, Fiack S, Graf C, Robinson A, Rowlands I (2009) Science journal editors’ views on publication ethics: results of an international survey. J Med Ethics 35:348–353
Graf C, Wager E, Bowman A, Fiack S, Scott-Lichter D, Robinson A (2007) Best practice guidelines on publication ethics: a publisher’s perspective. Int J Clin Pract Suppl 152:1–26
CONSORT website (2010) http://www.consort-statement.org. Accessed on 6 Nov 2010
EQUATOR website (2010) http://www.equator-network.org. Accessed on 6 Nov 2010
Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, on behalf of the CONSORT Group (2010) CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. BMC Med 8:18
Scales CD Jr, Norris RD, Keitz SA, Peterson BL, Preminger GM, Vieweg J, Dahm P (2007) A critical assessment of the quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials in the urology literature. J Urol 177(3):1090–1094 (discussion 1094–1095)
ICMJE (2010) Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. http://www.icmje.org. Accessed on 6 Nov 2010
Fletcher R, Ferris L and the WAME Publication Ethics and Editorial Policy Committees (2009) Policy statement: conflict of interest in peer-reviewed medical journals, July 25 2009, http://www.wame.org. Accessed on 6 Nov 2010
Friedman LS, Richter ED (2004) Relationship between conflicts of interest and research results. J Gen Intern Med 19:51–56
Blum JA, Freeman K, Dart RC, Cooper RJ (2009) Requirements and definitions in conflict of interest policies of medical journals. JAMA 302:2230–2234
Krimsky S, Rothenberg LS (2001) Conflict of interest policies in science and medical journals: editorial practices and author disclosures. Sci Eng Ethics 7:205–218
Drazen JM, Van Der Weyden MB, Sahni P et al (2009) Uniform format for disclosure of competing interests in ICMJE journals [published online ahead of print October 13, 2009]. JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1542
http://www.crossref.org/. Accessed 29 Oct 2010
Tramèer MR, Reynolds DJM, Moore RA, McQuay HJ (1997) Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study. BMJ 315:635–640
Errami M, Garner H (2008) A tale of two citations. Nature 451:397–399
http://etest.vbi.vt.edu/etblast3/. Accessed 2 Feb 2011
http://creativecommons.org/. Accessed 29 Oct 2010
http://www.facebook.com/publicationethics. Accessed 6 Nov 2010
http://publicationethics.org/. Accessed 29 Oct 2010
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sharrock, G., Graf, C. & Fitzpatrick, J.M. The role of ethical publishing in promoting the evidence-based practice of urology. World J Urol 29, 319–324 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-011-0661-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-011-0661-8