Abstract
Objective
We compared extended and limited lymph node dissections performed during radical cystectomy with regard to impact on survival and time to recurrence in bladder cancer patients.
Methods
We analyzed 170 patients who underwent radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma between January 1997 and December 2005. From 1997 to 2000, 69 of the patients were subjected to limited lymph dissection that included perivesical nodes and nodes in the obturator fossa. In 2001–2005, the remaining 101 patients underwent extended lymph dissection that included perivesical nodes; nodes in the obturator fossa; the internal, external, and common iliac nodes; and the presacral nodes.
Results
Tumors penetrating the bladder wall (pT3 and pT4a) were more common in the extended than in the limited dissection group (48 and 33%, respectively). The median numbers of lymph nodes removed in the two groups were 37 and 8, respectively. Lymph node metastases were detected in 38% of the extended dissection patients but only in 17% of the limited dissection patients. There was no significant difference in survival or time to recurrence between the two groups. Subgroup analyses showed a significantly longer time to recurrence (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.22–0.93; P = 0.032) in patients with non-organ-confined disease who underwent extended lymph node dissection. In a multivariate analysis adjusting for tumor stage, lymph node status, age, sex, and adjuvant chemotherapy, there was a significantly improved survival (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.25–0.88; P = 0.018) and time to recurrence (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.23–0.79; P = 0.007) in the patients with extended lymph node dissections.
Conclusions
Extended lymph node dissection did not improve disease-specific survival, but was in multivariate analysis related to significantly improved disease-specific survival and prolonged time to recurrence in radical cystectomy patients. These results should be interpreted cautiously, since they might have been affected by stage migration and the shorter follow-up in the extended dissection group.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Nationellt kvalitetsregister för blåscancer (2004) Diagnosår 2004. Socialstyrelsen, Svensk Urologisk Förening, Sveriges Onkologiska Centra 1:5–11
Thalmann G, Fleischmann A, Mills DR, Burkhard CF, Markwalder R, Studer EU (2003) Lymphadenectomy in bladder cancer. EAU Update Series 1:100–107
Kerr WS, Colby F (1950) Pelvic lymph node dissection and total cystectomy in the treatment of carcinoma of the bladder. J Urol 63:842–851
Skinner DG (1982) Management of invasive bladder cancer: a meticulous pelvic node dissection can make a difference. J Urol 128:34–36
Poulsen AL, Horn T, Steven K (1998) Radical cystectomy: extending the limits of pelvic lymph node dissection improves survival for patients with bladder cancer confined to the bladder wall. J Urol 160:2015–2020
Leissner J, Hohenfellner R, Thuroff JW, Wolf HK (2000) Lymphadenectomy in patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder: significance for staging and prognosis. BJU Int 85:817–823
Herr HW, Bochner BH, Dalbagnis G, Donat SM, Reuter VE, Bajorin DF (2002) Impact of the number of lymph nodes retrieved on outcome in patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer. J Urol 167:1295–1298
Konety BR, Joslyn SA, O’Donnell MA (2003) Extent of pelvic lymphadenectomy and its impact on outcome in patients diagnosed with bladder cancer: analysis of data from Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program data base. J Urol 169:946–950
Liedberg F, Chebil G, Davidsson T, Gudjonsson S, Månsson W (2006) Intraoperative sentinel node detection improves staging in invasive bladder cancer. J Urol 175:84–89
Sobin LH, Wittekind CL (2002) TNM classification of malignant tumours, 6th edn. Wiley, New York
Altman DG (1991) Practical statistics in medical research. Chapman & Hall, London, p 394
Dhar NB, Klein EA, Reuther AM, Thalmann GN, Madersbacher S, Studer UE (2008) Outcome after radical cystectomy with limited or extended pelvic lymph node dissection. J Urol 179:873–878
Vazina A, Dudi D, Shariat SF, Evans J, Link R, Lerner SP (2004) Stage specific lymph node metastasis mapping in radical cystectomy specimens. J Urol 171(5):1830–1834
Steven K, Poulsen AL (2007) Radical cystectomy and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy: survival of patients with lymph node metastasis above the bifurcation of the common iliac vessels treated with surgery only. J Urol 178:1218–1223
Suttmann H, Kamradt J, Lehmann J, Stöckle M (2007) Improving the prognosis of patients after radical cystectomy. Part I. The role of lymph node dissection. BJU Int 100:1221–1224
Dhar NB, Klein EA, Reuther AM, Thalmann GN, Madersbacher S, Studer UE (2008) Outcome after radical cystectomy with limited or extended pelvic lymph node dissection. J Urol 179:873–878
Herr HW (2003) Extent of surgery and pathology has an impact on bladder cancer outcomes after radical cystectomy. Urology 61:105–108
Bochner BH, Cho D, Herr HW, Donat M, Kattan MW, Dalbagni G (2004) Prospectively packaged lymph node dissections with radical cystectomy: evaluation of node count variability and node mapping. J Urol 172:1286–1290
Schwartz RE, Smith DD (2007) Clinical impact of lymphadenectomy extent in resectable esophageal cancer. J Gastroint Surg 11:1384–1398
Siewert JR, Böttcher K, Stein HJ, Roder JD, and the German Gastric Carcinoma Study Group (1998) Relevant prognostic factors in gastric cancer. Ann Surg 161:449–454
Caplin S, Cerottini JP, Bosman FT, Constanda MT, Givel JC (1998) For patients with Dukes’ (TNM Stage II) colorectal carcinoma, examination of six or fever lymph nodes is related to poor prognosis. Cancer 83:666–672
Conflict of interest statement
There is no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Holmer, M., Bendahl, PO., Davidsson, T. et al. Extended lymph node dissection in patients with urothelial cell carcinoma of the bladder: can it make a difference?. World J Urol 27, 521–526 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-008-0366-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-008-0366-9