Skip to main content
Log in

Complications of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy

  • Topic Paper
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To review the current evidence about laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) and its complications to define the role of this technique and to demonstrate specific operative modifications developed in a high volume laparoscopy centre.

Methods

The most recent literature was reviewed based on a PubMed search to evaluate the current types and rates of surgical complications following laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Own data and experiences were added. Particular alert was dedicated to detailed operative knowledge to avoid typical pitfalls.

Results

LPN is still a challenging option for treatment of small renal cell cancer (RCC) and the technique is under development. The intermediate-term functional and oncological results of LPN can compete with the standard options at least in laparoscopy dedicated centres. The learning curve has to be considered because of its great impact on the reduction of the risk of complications. Advantages of LPN are less blood loss, shorter hospital stay and less blood loss. A careful case selection is required in reliance on the surgeons` experience.

Conclusion

LPN is an additional but still challenging option for selected cases of RCC, which should be managed by the hands of experienced surgeons. Respecting these restrictions LPN has been shown to be equivalent to open partial nephrectomy. Distinctive attention has to be dedicated for improvement and standardization of operative techniques to decrease the learning curve of future users.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Winfield HN, Donovan JF, Godet AS, Clayman RV (1993) Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: initial case report for benign disease. J Endourol 7:521–526

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fergany AF, Hafez KS, Novick AC (2000) Long-term results of nephron sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma: 10-year follow up. J Urol 163(2):442–445

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Porpiglia F, Volpe A, Billia M, Scarpa RM (2008) Laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy: analysis of the current literature. Eur Urol 53:732–743

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ramani AP, Desai MM, Steinberg AP, Ng CS, Abreu SC, Kaouk JH, Finelli A, Novick AC, Gill IS (2005) Complications of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in 200 cases. J Urol 173:43–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Permpongkosol S, Link R, Su LM, Romero FR, Bagga HS, Palovich CP, Jarrett TW, Kavoussi LR (2007) Complications of 2,775 urological laparoscopic procedures: 1993 to 2005. J Urol 17:580–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Janetschek G, Jeschke K, Peschel R, Strohmeyer D, Henning K, Bartsch G (2000) Laparoscopic surgery for stage 1 renal cell carcinoma: radical nephrectomy and wedge resection. Eur Urol 38:131–138

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Abukora F, Nambirajan T, Albqami N, Leeb K, Jeschke S, Gschwendtner M, Janetschek G (2005) Laparoscopic nephron sparing surgery: evolution in a decade. Eur Urol 47:488–493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gill IS, Desei MM, Kaouk JH, Wani K, Desai MR (2002) Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumor: duplicating open surgical techniques. J Urol 167(2 pt 1):469–476

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Baumert H, Ballaro A, Shah N, Mansouri D, Zafar N, Molinié V, Neal D (2007) Reducing warm ischemia time during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a prospective comparison of two renal closure techniques. Eur Urol 52(4):1164–1169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gill IS, Ramani AP, Spaliviero M, Xu M, Finelli A, Kaouk JH, Desai MM (2002) Improved haemostasis during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy using gelatine matrix thrombin sealant. Urology 65:463–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Orvieto MA, Chien GW, Tolhurst SR, Rapp DE, Steinberg GD, Mikhail AA, Brendler CB, Shalhav AR (2005) Simplifying laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: technical considerations for reproducible outcomes. Urology 66:976–980

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Link RE, Bhayani SB, Allaf ME, Varkarakis I, Inagaki T, Rogers C (2005) Exploring the learning curve, pathological outcomes and perioperative morbidity of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy performed for renal mess. J Urol 173:1690–1694

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wright JL, Porter JR (2005) Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches. J Urol 174:841–845

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Simmons MN, Gill IS (2007) Decreased complications of contemporary laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: use of a standardized reporting system. J Urol 177:2067–2073

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Häcker A, Albadour A, Jauker W, Ziegerhofer J, Albquami N, Jeschke S, Leeb K, Janetschek G (2007) Nephron-sparing surgery for renal tumours: acceleration and facilitation of the laparoscopic technique. Eur Urol 51:358–365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Lane BR, Blute ML, Babineau D, Colombo JR, Frank I, Permpongkosol S, Weight CJ, Kaouk JH, Kattan MW, Novick C (2007) Comparison of 1, 800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors. J Urol 178:41–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cohenpour M, Strauss S, Gottlieb P, Peer A, Rimon U, Stav K, Gayer G (2007) Pseudoaneursym of the renal artery following partial nephrectomy: imaging findings and coil embolization. Clin Radiol 62(11):1104–1109

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Singh D, Gill IS (2005) Renal artery pseudoaneurysm following laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Urol 174(6):2256–2259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee CT, Katz J, Shi W, Thaer HT, Reuter VE, Russo P (2000) Surgical management of renal tumors 4 cm or less in a contemporary cohort. J Urol 163:730

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lau WK, Blute ML, Weaver AL, Torres VE, Zincke H (2000) Matched comparison of radical nephrectomy vs nephron-sparing surgery in patients with unilateral renal cell carcinoma and a normal contralateral kidney. Mayo Clin Proc 75:1236

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. McKiernan J, Simmons R, Katz J, Russo P (2002) Natural history of chronic renal insufficiency after partial and radical nephrectomy. Urology 59:816

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim FJ, Rha KH, Hernandez F, Jarrett TW, Pinto PA, Kavoussi LR (2003) Laparoscopic radical versus partial nephrectomy: assessment of complications. J Urol 170:408–411

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. McDougal WS, Gervais DA, McGovern FJ, Mueller PR (2005) Long-term follow up of patients with renal cell carcinoma treated with radio frequency ablation with curative intent. J Urol 174:61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lane BR, Gill IS (2007) 5-Years outcome of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Urol 177:70–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gill IS, Matin SF, Desai MM, Kaouk JH, Steinberg A, Mascha E (2003) Comparative analysis of laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for renal tumors in 200 patients. J Urol 170:64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schiff JD, Plaese M, Vaughan ED Jr, Sosa RE, Coll D, Del Pizzo JJ (2005) Laparoscopic vs open partial nephrectomy in consecutive patients: the Cornell experience. BJU Int 96:811–814

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sutherland SE, Resnick MI, Maclennan GT, Goldman HB (2002) Does the size of the surgical margin in partial nephrectomy for renal cell cancer really matter? J Urol 167:61–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gerard C, Ballereau C, Leroy X, Lemaitre L, Villers A, Biserte J (2003) Long-term oncological results after conservative surgery for unifocal renal cancer. Prog Urol 13:14–22

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Janetschek G (2007) Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for RCC: how can we avoid ischemic damage of the renal parenchyma? Eur Urol 52:1303–1305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Stephenson AJ, Hakimi AA, Snyder ME, Russo P (2004) Complications of radical and partial nephrectomy in a large contemporary cohort. J Urol 171:130–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Thompson RH, Leibovich BC, Lohse CM, Zincke H, Blute ML (2005) Complications of contemporary open nephron sparing surgery: a single institution experience. J Urol 174:855–858

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Breda A, Stepanian SV, Lam JS, Liao JC, Gill IS et al (2007) Use of haemostatic agents and glues during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a multi-institutional survey from the United States and Europe of 1347 cases. Eur Urol 52:798–803

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Klingler CH, Remzi M, Marberger M, Janetschek G (2006) Haemostasis in laparoscopy. Eur Urol 50:948–957

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

There is no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Günter Janetschek.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zimmermann, R., Janetschek, G. Complications of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. World J Urol 26, 531–537 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-008-0334-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-008-0334-4

Keywords

Navigation