Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The decision-related psychosocial concerns of men with localised prostate cancer: targets for intervention and research

  • Topic Paper
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To describe decision-related psychosocial issues relevant for men with clinically localised prostate cancer.

Methods

Searches were conducted across three electronic databases to search the health and psychological literature for articles examining decision-related psychosocial issues for men with localised prostate cancer and their partners. Medline, PsycINFO and CINAHL databases were examined for the period from 1990 to December 2007.

Results

Most men with localised prostate cancer want active involvement in decision-making. Difficulty in making the decision is common and decision-related distress may persist over time. Cancer-specific psychological distress (such as fear of recurrence but not overall anxiety) appears to be related to changes in PSA levels; and this distress influences treatment pathways. Decision support interventions are acceptable to men, improve knowledge and might reduce decision and cancer-related distress. However, the quality of intervention studies to date is low.

Conclusion

Clinicians should seek to involve men and their partners in treatment decision making concurrent with decision and psychological support. There is a need for high quality randomised control trials to identify the optimal approach to decision support for men with clinically localised prostate cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bloch S, Love A, Macvean M, Duchesne GM, Couper J, Kissane D (2007) Psychological adjustment of men with prostate cancer: a review of the literature. Biopsychosoc Med 1:2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Burnet KL, Parker C, Dearnaley D, Brwein CR, Watson M, Burnet KL (2007) Does active surveillance for men with localised prostate cancer carry psychological morbidity? BJU Int 100(3):540–543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Steginga SK, Occhipinti S, Gardiner RAF, Yaxley J, Heathcote P (2004) Prospective study of men’s psychological and decision-related adjustment after treatment for localized prostate cancer. Urology 63(4):751–756

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Eton DT, Lepore SJ (2002) Prostate cancer and health-related quality of life: a review of the literature. Psychooncology 11:307–326

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Potosky AL, Legler JL, Albertsen PC et al (2000) Health outcomes after prostatectomy or radiotherapy for prostate cancer: results from the prostate cancer outcomes study. J Natl Cancer Inst 92(19):1582–1592

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dale W, Bilir P, Han M, Meltzer D (2005) The role of anxiety in prostatic carcinoma: a structured review of the literature. Cancer 104:467

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bennett G, Badger T (2005) Depression in men with prostate cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 32:545–556

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zeliadt SB, Ramsey SD, Penson DF et al (2006) Why do men choose one treatment over another? A review of patient decision making for localised prostate cancer. Cancer 106:1865–1874

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fagerlin A, Rovner D, Stableford S, Jentoft C, Wei JT, Holmes-Rovner M (2004) Patient education materials about the treatment of early stage prostate cancer: a critical review. Ann Intern Med 140:721–728

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Davison BJ, Degner LF, Morgan TR (1995) Information and decision-making preferences of men with prostate cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 22(9):1404–1408

    Google Scholar 

  11. Berry DL, Ellis WJ, Russell KJ et al (2006) Factors that predict treatment choice and satisfaction with the decision in men with localized prostate cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer 5(3):219–226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Davison BJ, Degner LF (1997) Empowerment of men newly diagnosed with prostate cancer. Cancer Nurs 20(3):187–196

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Davison BJ, Goldenberg SL (2003) Decisional regret and quality of life after participating in medical decision-making for early-stage prostate cancer. BJU Int 91(1):14–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Davison BJ, Parker PA, Goldenberg SL (2004). Patients’ preferences for communicating a prostate cancer diagnosis and participating in medical decision making BJU Int 93:47–51

    Google Scholar 

  15. Davison BJ, Goldenberg SL, Gleave ME, Degner LF (2003) Provision of individualized information to men and their partners to facilitate treatment decision making in prostate cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 30(1):107–114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Davison BJ, Goldenberg SL, Wiens KP, Gleave ME (2007) Comparing a generic and individualized information decision support intervention for men newly diagnosed with localized prostate cancer. Cancer Nurs 30(5):E7–E15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Flynn D, van Schaik P, van Wersch A, Ahmed T, Chadwick D (2004) The utility of a multimedia education program for prostate cancer patients: a formative evaluation. Br J Cancer 91(5):855–860

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gwede CK, Pow-Sang J, Seigne J et al (2005) Treatment decision-making strategies and influences in patients with localized prostate carcinoma. Cancer 104(7):1381–1390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wong F, Stewart D, Dancey J et al (2000) Men with prostate cancer: influence of psychological factors on informational needs and decision making. J Psychosom Res 49:13–19

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Clark JA, Inui TS, Silliman RA et al (2003) Patients’ perceptions of quality of life after treatment for early prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 21(20):3777–3784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Diefenbach MA, Mohamed NE (2007) Regret of treatment decision and its association with disease-specific quality of life following prostate cancer treatment. Cancer Invest 25(6):449–457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hoffman RM, Hunt WC, Gilliland FD, Stephenson RA, Potosky AL (2003) Patient satisfaction with treatment decisions for clinically localized prostate carcinoma. Results from the prostate cancer outcomes study. Cancer 97(7):1653–1662

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hu JC, Kwan L, Saigal CS, Litwin MS (2003) Regret in men treated for localized prostate cancer. J Urol 169(6):2279–2283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Steginga SK, Occhipinti S (2006) Dispositional optimism as a predictor of men’s decision-related distress after localized prostate cancer. Health Psychol 25(2):135–143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Clark JA, Talcott JA (2006) Confidence and uncertainty long after initial treatment for early prostate cancer: survivors’ views of cancer control and the treatment decisions they made. J Clin Oncol 24(27):4457–4463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Davison BJ, So AI, Goldenberg SL (2007) Quality of life, sexual function and decisional regret at 1 year after surgical treatment for localized prostate cancer. BJU Int 100(4):780–785

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Diefenbach MA, Dorsey J, Uzzo RG et al (2002) Decision-making strategies for patients with localized prostate cancer. Semin Urol Oncol 20(1):55–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dale J, Jatsch W, Hughes N, Pearce A, Meystre C (2004) Information needs and prostate cancer: the development of a systematic means of identification. BJU Int 94(1):63–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Martin RM, Gunnell D, Hamdy F, Neal D, Lane A, Donovan J (2006) Continuing controversy over monitoring men with localized prostate cancer: a systematic review of programs in the prostate specific antigen era. J Urol 176(2):439–449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pickles T, Ruether JD, Weir L, Carlson L, Jakulj F, Communication Team SCRN (2007) Psychosocial barriers to active surveillance for the management of early prostate cancer and a strategy for increased acceptance. BJU Int 100(3):544–551

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Vicini FA, Vargas C, Abner A, Kestin L, Horwitz E, Martinez A (2005) Limitations in the use of serum prostate specific antigen levels to monitor patients after treatment for prostate cancer. J Urol 173(5):1456–1462

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Roth A, Nelson C, Rosenfeld B et al (2006) Assessing anxiety in men with prostate cancer: Further data on the reliability and validity of the memorial anxiety scale for prostate cancer (MAX-PC). Psychosomatics 47:340–347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lintz K, Moynihan C, Steginga S et al (2003) Prostate cancer patients’ support and psychological care needs: survey from a non-surgical oncology clinic. Psychooncology 12(8):769–783

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Patel MI, DeConcini DT, Lopez-Corona E, Ohori M, Wheeler T, Scardino PT (2004) An analysis of men with clinically localized prostate cancer who deferred definitive therapy. J Urol 171(4):1520–1524

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Latini D, Hart S, Knight S et al (2007) The relationship between anxiety and time to treatment for patients with prostate cancer on surveillance. J Urol 178:821–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Patel HR, Mirsadraee S, Emberton M (2003) The patient’s dilemma: prostate cancer treatment choices. J Urol 169(3):828–833

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Zeliadt SB, Ramsey SD, Penson DF et al (2006) Why do men choose one treatment over another? A review of patient decision making for localized prostate cancer. Cancer 106(9):1865–1874

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Chapple A, Ziebland S, Herxheimer A, McPherson S, Shepperd S, Miller R (2002) Is ‘watchful waiting’ a real choice or men with prostate cancer? A qualitative study. BJU Int 90:257–264

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Maliski SL, Heilemann MV, McCorkle R (2002) From “death sentence” to “good cancer”: Couples’ transformation of a prostate cancer diagnosis. Nurs Res 51(6):393–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Srirangam SJ, Pearson E, Grose C, Brown SC, Collins GN, O’Reilly PH (2003) Partner’s influence on patient preference for treatment in early prostate cancer. BJU Int 92(4):365–369

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. O’Rourke ME, Germino BB (1998) Prostate cancer treatment decisions: a focus group exploration. Oncol Nurs Forum 25:97–104

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Couper J, Bloch S, Love A, Macvean M, Duchesne GM, Kissane D (2006) Psychosocial adjustment of female partners of men with prostate cancer: a review of the literature. Psychooncology 15(11):937–953

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Bailey D, Wallace M, Mishel M (2007) Watching, waiting and uncertainty in prostate cancer. J Clin Nursing 16:734–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Knight SJ, Latini D, Hart SL et al (2007) Education predicts quality of life among men with prostate cancer cared for in the department of veterans affairs. Cancer 109:1796–1876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Kim SP, Knight S, Tomori C et al (2001) Health literacy and shared decision making for prostate cancer patients with low socioeconomic status. Cancer Invest 19(7):684–691

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Manning DL, Dickens C (2006) Health literacy: more choice, but do cancer patients have the skills to decide? Eur J Cancer 15:448–452

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Dall’era MA, Cooperberg MR, Chan JM et al (2008) Active surveillance for early-stage prostate cancer: review of the current literature. Cancer 112:1650–1659

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Bourton I, Moher D, Altman D, Schulz K, Ravaud P (2008) Extending the CONSORT statement to randomised trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 148:295–309

    Google Scholar 

  49. Auvinen A, Hakama M, Ala-Opas M et al (2004) A randomized trial of choice of treatment in prostate cancer: the effect of intervention on the treatment chosen. Bju Int 93(1):52–56

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Auvinen A, Vornanen T, Tammela TL et al (2001) A randomized trial of the choice of treatment in prostate cancer: design and baseline characteristics. BJU Int 88(7):708–715

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Hack TF, Pickles T, Bultz BD, Ruether JD, Degner LF (2007) Impact of providing audiotapes of primary treatment consultations to men with prostate cancer: a multi-site, randomized, controlled trial. Psychooncology 16(6):543–552

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Steginga SK, Ferguson M, Clutton S, Gardiner RA, Nicol D Early decision and psychosocial support for men with localised prostate cancer: an integrated approach. Suppor Care Cancer (Epub ahead of print)

Download references

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the support of Ms Michelle McDowell and Ms Melissa Legg in the undertaking of this review.

Conflict of interest statement

There is no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Programs and Research, The Cancer Council Queensland, School of Psychology, Griffith University, PO Box 201, Spring Hill, QLD 4004, Australia

    Suzanne K. Steginga

  2. Department of Social Medicine, Bristol, UK

    Emma Turner & Jenny Donovan

Authors
  1. Suzanne K. Steginga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Emma Turner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jenny Donovan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suzanne K. Steginga.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Steginga, S.K., Turner, E. & Donovan, J. The decision-related psychosocial concerns of men with localised prostate cancer: targets for intervention and research. World J Urol 26, 469–474 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-008-0279-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-008-0279-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation