Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Oxalate and its handling in a low stone risk vs a stone-prone population group

  • Topic Paper
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite hyperoxalurogenic eating habits relative to white subjects, South African blacks have urinary oxalate excretions, Tiselius risk indices (APCaOx) and calcium oxalate saturations, which do not differ significantly from those of their white counterparts. The present study was undertaken to establish whether the BONN-Risk-Index (BRI) might discriminate between the urines of the two population groups and whether differences might exist in their respective gastrointestinal absorption rates of oxalate. Participants (n=15 in each group) provided 24 h urines on their free diets for BRI determination. Gastrointestinal oxalate absorption was measured using the [13C2]oxalate absorption test. Results showed that BRI values were significantly lower in black subjects (2.04 vs 4.90, P=0.034), but that there was no difference in the oxalate absorption between the groups (10.30 vs 9.95%, P=0.87). These results suggest that South African black subjects handle dietary oxalate more efficaciously than white subjects and that this occurs via some endogenous mechanism, which has not yet been identified or characterized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fleisch H (1990) Role of inhibition and promoters of crystal nucleation, growth and aggregation in the formation of calcium stones. In: Wickham JEA, Buck AC (eds) Renal tract stone-metabolic basis and clinical practice. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 295–306

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hesse A, Schneeberger W, Engfeld S, von Unruh GE, Sauerbruch T (1999) Intestinal hyperabsorption of oxalate in calcium oxalate stone formers: application of a new test with [13C2]oxalate. J Am Soc Nephrol 10:S329–S333

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Holmes RP, Assimos DG (2004) The impact of dietary oxalate on kidney stone formation. Urol Res 32:311–316

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Laube N, Schneider A, Hesse A (2000) A new approach to calculate the risk of calcium oxalate crystallization from unprepared native urines. Urol Res 28:274–280

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Laube N, Hergarten S, Hoppe B, Schmidt M, Hesse A (2004) Determination of the calcium oxalate crystallization risk from urine samples—the BONN-Risk-Index in comparison to other risk formulas. J Urol 172:355–359

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lewandowski S, Rodgers AL (2004) Renal response to lithogenic and anti-lithogenic supplement challenges in a stone-free population group. J Ren Nutr 14(3):170–179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lewandowski S, Rodgers AL (2004) Idiopathic calcium oxalate urolithiasis: risk factors and conservative treatment. Clin Chim Acta 345:17–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lewandowski S, Rodgers AL, Schloss I (2001) The influence of a high-oxalate/low-calcium diet on calcium renal stone risk factors in non-stone-forming black and white South African subjects. BJU Int 87:307–311

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Li MK, Blacklock JN, Garside J (1985) Effects of magnesium on calcium oxalate crystallization. J Urol 133:123–125

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Modlin M (1967) The aetiology of renal stones: a new concept arising from studies on a stone-free population. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 40:155–178

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Robertson WG, Peacock M, Heyburn PJ, Marshall DH, Clark PB (1978) Risk factors in calcium stone disease of the urinary tract. Br J Urol 50:449–454

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rodgers AL, Lewandowski S (2002) Effects of 5 different diets on urinary risk factors for calcium oxalate kidney stone formation: evidence of different renal handling mechanisms in different race groups. J Urol 168:931–936

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tiselius HG (1982) An improved method for the routine biochemical evaluation of patients with recurrent calcium oxalate stone disease. Clin Chim Acta 122:409–418

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tiselius HG, Fornander AM, Nilsson MA (1993) The effects of citrate and urine on calcium oxalate aggregation. Urol Res 21:363–366

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Viljoen A, Gericke G (2001) Food habits and food preferences of black South African men in the army (1993–1994). J Fam Ecol Consumer Sci 29:100–115

    Google Scholar 

  16. von Unruh GE, Langer MAW, Paar DW, Hesse A (1998) Mass spectrometric-selected ion monitoring assay for an oxalate absorption test applying [13C2]oxalate. J Chromatogr B 716:343–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. von Unruh GE, Voss S, Sauerbruch T, Hesse A (2003) Reference range for gastrointestinal oxalate absorption measured with a standardized [13C2]oxalate absorption test. J Urol 169:687–690

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Werness PG, Brown CM, Smith LH (1985) EQUIL 2: a basic computer programme for the calculation of urinary saturation. J Urol 134:1242–1244

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Whalley NA, Moraes MFBG, Shar TG, Pretorius SS, Meyers AM (1998) Lithogenic risk factors in the urine of black and white subjects. Br J Urol 82:785–790

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wolmarans P, Humphreys J, Sayed N (2001) Foodfinder™ 2. Nutritional Intervention Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to express their thanks to the Volkswagen Stiftung for financial support and Mrs M. Klöckner for technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemistry, University of Cape Town, Private Bag, Rondebosch 7701, Cape Town, South Africa

    Sonja Lewandowski & Allen L. Rodgers

  2. Department of Urology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany

    Norbert Laube, Diana Zimmermann & Albrecht Hesse

  3. Department of Internal Medicine I, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany

    Gerd von Unruh

Authors
  1. Sonja Lewandowski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Allen L. Rodgers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Norbert Laube
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gerd von Unruh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Diana Zimmermann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Albrecht Hesse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Allen L. Rodgers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lewandowski, S., Rodgers, A.L., Laube, N. et al. Oxalate and its handling in a low stone risk vs a stone-prone population group. World J Urol 23, 330–333 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-005-0030-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-005-0030-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation