Skip to main content
Log in

Follow-up of men obtaining a six-core versus a ten-core benign prostate biopsy 7 years previously

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the proportion of repeat biopsies after 7 years in men with an initial benign six- or ten-core biopsy as well as the incidence of prostate cancer (PC) in the repeat biopsies. In this retrospective longitudinal study, 116 men with an elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and/or a suspicious digital rectal examination (DRE) who have had a benign prostate biopsy between January 1997 and September 1997 were included. Fifty-eight men had an initial benign six-core biopsy (median PSA 7.5 ng/ml, range 0.3–67) (group A), and 58 men had an initial benign ten-core biopsy (median PSA 7.5 ng/ml, range 0.8–91.4) (group B). We analysed men with a pathological PSA velocity, a persistently elevated PSA, an abnormal DRE, a high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or atypical adenomatous hyperplasia, or atypical small acinar proliferation as indication for rebiopsy. Furthermore, we analysed a subgroup with exclusively an increased PSA velocity (>0.75 ng/ml per year) as indication for rebiopsy. In group A, 14 men had a follow-up biopsy. In this group, follow-up biopsies yielded PC in eight men (13.8%), six (10.3%) had a negative follow-up biopsy. In contrast, in group B only four men (3.4%) had a follow-up biopsy (P=0.005). Two of them (3.4%) had PC (P=0.02), two cases (3.4%) showed a benign histology (P=0.06). The use of an extended biopsy protocol at the initial evaluation reduces the number of repeat biopsies required and decreases the number of PC detection in the follow-up biopsy cohort.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hodge K, McNeal JE, Terris MK, Stamey TA (1989) Random systematic vs directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J Urol 142:71–74

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Eskew LA, Bare RL, McCullough DL (1997) Systematic five region prostate biopsy is superior to sextant biopsy for diagnosing carcinoma of the prostate. J Urol 157:199–203

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Brossner C, Madersbacher S, Bayer G, Pycha A, Klingler HC, Maier U (2000) A comparative study of two different TRUS guided sextant biopsy techniques in detecting PC in one biopsy session. Eur Urol 37:65–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Vashi AR, Wojno KJ, Gillespie B, Oesterling JE (1998) A model for the number of cores per prostate biopsy based on patient age and prostate gland volume. J Urol 159(3):920–924

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Emiliozzi P, Longhi S, Scarpone P, Pansadoro A, DePaula F, Pansadoro V (2001) The value of a single biopsy with 12 transperineal cores for detecting prostate cancer in patients with elevated PSA. J Urol 166:845–850

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Norberg M, Egevad L, Holmberg L, Sparen P, Norlen BJ, Busch C (1997) The sextant protocol for ultrasound guided core biopsies of the prostate underestimates the presence of cancer. Urology 50:562–566

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Stewart CS, Leibovich BC, Weaver AL, Lieber MM (2001) Prostate cancer diagnosis using a saturation needle biopsy technique after previous negative sextant biopsies. J Urol 166:86–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen ME, Johnston DA, Tang K, Babaian RJ, Troncoso P (2000) Detailed mapping of prostate carcinoma foci: biopsy strategy implications. Cancer 89:1800–1809

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fink K, Hutarew G, Lumper W (2001) Prostate cancer detection with two sets of ten-core compared with two sets of sextant biopsies. Urology 58:735–739

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Eskicorapci SY, Ekici S, Atsu MN, Dogan R, Ozen H (2004) An extended 10-core transrectal ultrasonography guided prostate biopsy protocol improves the detection of prostate cancer. Eur Urol 45:444–448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Borboroglu PG, Comer SW, Riffenburgh RH, Amling CL (2000) Extensive repeat transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy in patients with previous benign sextant biopsies. J Urol 163:158–162

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rabets JC, Jones JS, Patel A, Zippe CD (2004) Prostate cancer detection with office based saturation biopsy in a repeat biopsy population. J Urol 172:94–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Boddy JL, Pike DJ, Malone PR (2003) A seven-year follow-up of men following a benign prostate biopsy. Eur Urol 44:17–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clemens Brossner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brossner, C., Madersbacher, S., de Mare, P. et al. Follow-up of men obtaining a six-core versus a ten-core benign prostate biopsy 7 years previously. World J Urol 23, 419–421 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-005-0025-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-005-0025-3

Keywords

Navigation