Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Contemporary management of penile cancer including surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy: an experience in Taiwan

  • Free Paper
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This retrospective study reports on the treatment outcomes of 45 men with penile cancer and seeks to address the issue concerning the treatment of inguinal lymph nodes (LN). Of these 45 patients, five had verrucous carcinoma and the other 40 had squamous cell carcinoma. Eighteen patients had inguinal lymph nodes (LNs) metastasis and received treatments of inguinal LNs involving bilateral inguinal LN dissection or unilateral inguinal LN dissection with or without postoperative radiotherapy. The median follow-up was 37 months. The ultimate local and regional controls for patients with verrucous carcinoma were 100 and 100%, respectively. Among the 40 patients with squamous cell carcinoma, the overall local control rate was 90%. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates of patients without or with pathological inguinal LN metastasis were 70 vs. 22% (p=0.01), and 55 vs. 16% (p=0.004), respectively. The regional failure rates after inguinal LN dissection for pathological inguinal LN metastasis were 11% (1/9) and 60% (3/5) in patients with and without adjuvant radiotherapy. This study demonstrates that verrucous carcinoma shows excellent treatment outcomes following surgery alone. Squamous cell carcinoma of the penis is associated with a high incidence of inguinal lymph node metastasis. Elective groin dissection is indicated for all penile cancer patients except those with verrucous carcinoma and pT1 cancer with well-differentiated tumor. For patients with pathologically positive inguinal LN metastasis, adjuvant radiotherapy can increase inguinal control in this study. It warrants further prospective trial to prove the value of adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with pathological documented inguinal LN metastasis in penile cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adeyoju AB, Thornhill J, Corr J, et al (1997) Prognostic factors in squamous cell carcinoma of the penis and implications for management. Br J Urology 80:937–939

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chiu TY, Huang HS, Lai MK, et al (1998) Penile cancer in Taiwan—20 years’ experience at National Taiwan University Hospital. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association 97:673–678

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Clifford Chao KS, Perez CA (1998) Penis and male urethra. In: Perze CA, Brady LW (eds) Principle and practice of radiation oncology, 3th edn. Lippincott, Philadelphia. pp 1717–173

  4. Connell CF, Berger NA (1994) Management of advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. Urol Clin North Am 21:745–755

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Crawford ED, Daneshgari F (1992) Management of advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. Urol Clin North Am 19:305–317

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fleming ID, Cooper JS, Hutter R, et al (1997) Manual for staging of cancer, 5th edn. JB Lippincott Co, Philadelphia, pp 215–217

  7. Gerbaulet A, Lambin P (1992) Radiation therapy of cancer of the penis. Urol Clin North Am 19:325–331

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Herr HW, Dalbagni G, Bajorin D (2000) Cancer of the urethra and penis. In: Devita VT, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA (eds) Cancer. Principle and practice of oncology, 6th edn, vol I.II. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 1480–1490

  9. Horenblas S (2001) Lymphadenectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. Part 1: Diagnosis of lymph node metastasis. BJU International 88:467–472

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Horenblas S (2001) Lymphadenectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. Part 2: The role and technique of lymph node dissection. BJU International 88:473–483

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Horenblas S, Tinteren HA (1994) Squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. IV. Prognostic factors of survival: analysis of tumor, nodes and metastasis classification system. J Urology 151:1239–1243

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Horenblas S, Tinteren HV, Delemarre JFM, et al (1993) Squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. III. Treatment of regional lymph nodes. J Urology 149:492–497

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Homesley HD, Bundy B, Sedlis A, et al (1986) Radiation therapy versus pelvic node resection for carcinoma of the vulva with positive groin nodes. Obstet Gynecol 68:733

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mobilio G, Ficarra V (2001) Genital treatment of penile carcinoma. Current Opion Urol 11:299–304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. McCall AR, Olson MC, Potkul RK (1995) The variation of inguinal LN depth in adult women and its importance in planning elective irradiation for vulvar cancer. Cancer 75:2286–2288

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ornellas AA, Seixas ALC, Marota A, et al (1994) Surgical treatment of invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: retrospective analysis of 350 cases. J Urology 151:1244–1249

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Petereit DG, Mehta MP, Buchler DA, et al (1993) Inguinofemoral radiation of N0, N1 vulvar cancer may be equivalent to lymphadenectomy if proper radiation technique is used. Int J Radiation Oncology Biol Phys 27:963–967

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sarin R, Norman AR, Steel GG, et al (1997) Treatment results and prognostic factors in 101 men treated for squamous carcinoma of the penis. Int J Radiation Oncology Biol Phys 38:713

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Solsona E, Iborra I, Rubio J, et al (2001) Prospective validation of the association of local tumor stage and grade as a predictive factor for occult lymph node micrometastasis in patients with penile carcinoma and clinical negative inguinal lymph nodes. J Urology 165:1506–1509

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Soria JC, Fizazi K, Piron K, et al (1997) Squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: multivariate analysis of prognostic factors and natural history in a monocentric study with a conservative policy. Ann Oncol 8:1089–1098

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Srinivas V, Choudary R, Ravikumar R, et al (1995) Penile carcinoma—is lymphadenectomy necessary in all cases? Urology 46:710–712

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Theodorescu D, Russi P, Zhang ZF, et al (1996) Outcomes of initial surveillance of invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis and negative nodes. J Urology 155:1626–1631

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zelefsky MJ, Fuks ZVI, Hunt M, et al (2001) High dose radiation delivered by intensity modulated conformal radiotherapy improves the outcome of localized prostate cancer. J Urology 166:876–881

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, 5 Fu-Shin St., 33333, Taoyuan, Taiwan

    Joseph Tung-Chieh Chang

  2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiai, Taiwan

    Miao-Fen Chen & Wen-Cheng Chen

  3. Department of Urology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, LinKou, Taiwan

    Chun-Te Wu & Cheng-Keng Chuang

  4. Department of Pathology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, LinKou, Taiwan

    Kwai-Fong Ng

Authors
  1. Miao-Fen Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wen-Cheng Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chun-Te Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Cheng-Keng Chuang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kwai-Fong Ng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Joseph Tung-Chieh Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph Tung-Chieh Chang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, MF., Chen, WC., Wu, CT. et al. Contemporary management of penile cancer including surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy: an experience in Taiwan. World J Urol 22, 60–66 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-003-0383-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-003-0383-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation