Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Predictive genetic testing in urology: ethical and social issues

  • Topic Paper
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to maximize the benefits of predictive genetic testing in urology, the potential ethical and social risks must be identified and minimized. Necessary steps include providing adequate information for patients and families; preparing them to receive test results; maintaining confidentiality to avoid social stigma and discrimination; preserving the principal of solidarity to provide assurances of medical care and social support for persons at risk of genetic illness; and avoiding inappropriate social pressure to prevent the birth of at-risk individuals. Health professionals must play a significant role in helping individuals, families, and society in general to make sound testing decisions and policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews LB (1996) Prenatal screening and the culture of motherhood. Hastings Law J 47:967–1000

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, et al (1994) Assessing genetic risks: implications for health and social policy. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews LB, Mehlman MJ, Rothstein MA (2002) Genetics: ethics, law and policy. West Group, St. Paul, MN

  • Bloch M, Adam S, Wiggins S, Huggins M, Hayden MR (1992) Predictive testing for Huntington disease in Canada: the experience of those receiving an increased risk. Am J Med Genet 42:499–507

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doukas DJ, Berg JW (2001) The family covenant and genetic testing. Am J Bioethics 1:3–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greely HT (1997) The control of genetic research: involving the groups “in between.” Houston L Rev 33:1414–1415

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtzman NA, Watson MS (1997) Promoting safe and effective genetic testing in the United States. Final report of the task force on genetic testing

  • Huggins M, et al (1992) Predictive testing for Huntington disease in Canada: adverse effects and unexpected results in those receiving a decreased risk. Am J Med Genet 42:508–515

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jost TS (2001) Private or public approaches to insuring the uninsured: lessons from international experience with private insurance. New York University Law Review 76:419–491

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoppers BM, Strom C, Clayton EW, Murray T, Fibison W, Luther L (1998) Professional disclosure of familial genetic information. Am J Hum Genet 62:474–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin T (2000) Boom in genetic testing raises questions on sharing results. NY Times July 21, A1

  • McEwen J (2000) Genetic information, ethics, and information relating to biological parenthood. In: Murray T, Mehlman M (eds) Encyclopedia of ethical, legal, and policy issues in biotechnology. John Wiley and Sons, New York pp 356–362

  • Mitka M (2000) Neonatal screening varies by state of birth. JAMA 284:2044

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nickens H (1996) The genome project and health services for minority populations. In: Murray T, et al (eds) The human genome project and the future of health care. Indiana University Press, Bloomington

  • Pate v. Threlkel, 661 So.2d 278 (Fla. 1995)

  • Robertson JA (2003) The $1000 genome: ethical and legal issues in whole genome sequencing of individuals. Am J Bioethics 3(3):InFocus

    Google Scholar 

  • Safer v. Pack, 677 A.2d 1188 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1996)

  • Taylor v. Kurapati, 600 N.W. 2nd 670 (Mich. App. 1999)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Law-Medicine Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Law, Cleveland, OH, USA

    Maxwell J. Mehlman

  2. Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA

    Maxwell J. Mehlman

Authors
  1. Maxwell J. Mehlman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maxwell J. Mehlman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mehlman, M.J. Predictive genetic testing in urology: ethical and social issues. World J Urol 21, 433–437 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-003-0376-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-003-0376-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation