Abstract
Most plants emit ethylene in response to herbivory by insects from many different feeding guilds. The elicitors of these ethylene emissions are thought to be microorganisms or oral secretion-specific compounds that are transferred when the attacking insect feeds. To find the receptors for these elicitors and describe the signaling cascades that are subsequently activated will be the challenge of future research. Past experiments on the function of herbivore-induced ethylene, which were biased toward the use of chemical treatments to manipulate ethylene, identified seven ethylene-dependent defense responses. In contrast, a genetic toolbox that consists of several mutants has rarely been used and to date, mutants have helped to identify only one additional ethylene-dependent defense response. Ethylene-dependent responses include the emission of specific volatile organic compounds as indirect defense, the accumulation of phenolic compounds, and proteinase inhibitor activity. Besides being ethylene regulated, these defenses depend strongly on the wound-hormone jasmonic acid (JA). That ethylene requires the concomitant induction of JA, or other signals, appears to be decisive. Rather than being the principal elicitor of defense responses, ethylene modulates the sensitivity to a second signal and its downstream responses. Given this modulator role, and the artifacts associated with the use of chemical treatments to manipulate ethylene production and perception, future advances in the study of ethylene’s function in plant–herbivore interactions will likely come from the use of signaling mutants or transgenic plants. It will be exciting to see if adaptive phenotypic plasticity is largely an ethylene-mediated response.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alborn HT, Turlings TCJ, Jones TH, Stenhagen G, Loughrin JH, et al. 1997. An elicitor of plant volatiles from beet armyworm oral secretion. Science 276:945–949
Anderson JA, Peters DC. 1994. Ethylene production from wheat seedlings infested with biotypes of Schizaphis graminum (Homoptera: Aphididae). Environ Entomol 23:992–998
Argandoña VH, Chaman M, Cardemil L, Muñoz O, Zúñiga GE, et al. 2001. Ethylene production and peroxidase activity in aphid-infested barley. J Chem Ecol 27:53–68
Arimura G-I, Ozawa R, Nishioka T, Boland W, Koch T, et al. 2002. Herbivore-induced volatiles induce the emission of ethylene in neighboring lima bean plants. Plant J 29:87–98
Baldwin IT. 1998. Jasmonate-induced responses are costly but benefit plants under attack in native populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:8113–8118
Boughton AJ, Hoover K, Felton GW. 2006. Impact of chemical elicitor applications on greenhouse tomato plants and population growth of the green peach aphid, Myzus persicae. Entomol Exp Appl 120:175–188
Chae HS, Kieber JJ. 2005. Eto brute? Role of ACS turnover in regulating ethylene biosynthesis. Trends Plant Sci 10:291–296
Czarny JC, Grichko VP, Glick BR. 2006. Genetic modulation of ethylene biosynthesis and signaling in plants. Biotech Adv 20:672–677
De Vos M, van Zaanen W, Koornneef A, Korzelius JP, Dicke M, et al. 2006. Herbivore-induced resistance against microbial pathogens in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 142:352–363
De Vos M, van Oosten VR, van Poecke RMP, van Pelt JA, Pozo MJ, et al. 2005. Signal signature and transciptome changes of Arabidopsis during pathogen and insect attack. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 18:923–937
Dillwith JW, Berberet RC, Bergman DK, Neese PA, Edwards RM, et al. 1991. Plant biochemistry and aphid populations: studies on the spotted alfalfa aphid, Therioaphis maculata. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 17:235–251
Duffey JE, Powell RD. 1979. Microbial induced ethylene synthesis as a possible factor of square abscission and stunting in cotton infested by cotton fleahopper. Ann Entomol Soc Am 72:599–601
Fujita M, Fujita Y, Noutoshi Y, Takahashi F, Narusaka Y, K and others. 2006. Crosstalk between abiotic and biotic stress responses: a current view from the points of convergence in the stress signaling networks. Curr Opin Plant Biol 9:436–442
Grisham MP, Sterling WL, Powell RD, Morgan PW. 1987. Characterization of the induction of stress ethylene synthesis in cotton caused by the cotton fleahopper (Hemiptera: Miridae) and its microorganisms. Ann Entomol Soc Am 80:411–416
Halitschke R, Baldwin IT. 2003. Antisense LOX expression increases herbivore performance by decreasing defense responses and inhibiting growth-related transcriptional reorganization in Nicotiana attenuata. Plant J 36:794–807
Halitschke R, Baldwin IT. 2005. Jasmonates and related compounds in plant-insect interactions. J Plant Growth Regul 23:238–245
Halitschke R, Schittko U, Pohnert G, Boland W, Baldwin IT. 2001. Molecular interactions between the specialist herbivore Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae) and its natural host Nicotiana attenuata. 3. Fatty acid-amino acid conjugates in herbivore oral secretions are necessary and sufficient for herbivore-specific plant responses. Plant Physiol 125:711–717
Harfouche AL, Shivaji R, Stocker R, Williams PW, Luthe DS. 2006. Ethylene signaling mediates a maize defense response to insect herbivory. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 19:189–199
Horiuchi J-I, Arimura G-I, Ozawa R, Shimoda T, Takabayash J, et al. 2001. Exogenous ACC enhances volatiles production mediated by jasmonic acid in lima bean leaves. FEBS Lett 509:332–336
Hudgins JW, Franceschi VR. 2004. Methyl jasmoante-induced ethylene production is responsible for conifer phloem defense responses and reprogramming of stem cambial zone for traumatic resin duct formation. Plant Physiol 135:2134–2149
Izaguirre MM, Mazza CA, Biondini M, Baldwin IT, Ballaré CL. 2006. Remote sensing of future competitors: impacts on plant defenses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:7170–7174
Kahl J, Siemens DH, Aerts RJ, Gaebler R, Kuehnemann F, et al. 2000. Herbivore-induced ethylene suppresses a direct defense but not a putative indirect defense against an adapted herbivore. Planta 210:336–342
Kappel F, Proctor JTA, Murr DP. 1987. Effect of spotted tentiform leafminer injury on ethylene production and ACC content in apple leaves. HortScience 22:469–471
Kendall DM, Bjostad LB. 1990. Herbivory by Thrips tabaci induces greater ethylene production in intact onions than mechanical damage alone. J Chem Ecol 16:981–991
Klee HJ. 2004. Ethylene signal transduction. Moving beyond Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 135:660–667
Kruzmane D, Jankevica L, Levinsh G. 2002. Effect of regurgitant from Leptinotarsa decemlineata on wound responses in Solanum tuberosum and Phaseolus vulgaris. Physiol Plant 115:577–584
Llops-Tous I, Barry CS, Grierson D. 2000. Regulation of ethylene biosynthesis in response to pollination in tomato flowers. Plant Physiol 123:971–978
Martin WR, Morgan PW, Sterling WL, Kenerley CM. 1988. Cotton fleahopper and associated microorganisms as components in the production of stress ethylene by cotton. Plant Physiol 87:280–285
Mathooko FM, Tsunashima Y, Owino WZO, Kubo Y, Inaba A. 2001. Regulation of genes encoding ethylene biosynthetic enzymes in peach (Prunus persica L.) fruit by carbon dioxide and 1-methylcyclopropene. Postharvest Biol Technol 21:265–281
Mewis I, Appel HM, Hom A, Raina R, Schultz JC. 2005. Major signaling pathways modulate Arabidopsis glucosinolate accumulation and response to both phloem-feeding and chewing insects. Plant Physiol 138:1149–4462
Miller HL, Neese PA, Ketring DL, Dillwirth JW. 1994. Involvement of ethylene in aphid infestantion of barley. J Plant Growth Regul 13:167–171
Negre F, Kish CM, Boatright J, Underwood B, Shibuya K, et al. 2003. Regulation of methylbenzoate emission after pollination in snapdragon and petunia flowers. Plant Cell 15:2992–3006
Nemhauser JL, Hong F, Chory J. 2006. Different plant hormones regulate similar processes through largely nonoverlapping transcriptional responses. Cell 126:467–475
O’Donnell PJ, Calvert C, Atzorn R, Wasternack C, Leyser HMO, et al. 1996. Ethylene as a signal mediating the wound response of tomato plants. Science 274:1914–1917
Patterson SE, Bleecker AB. 2004. Ethylene-dependent and -independent processes associated with floral organ abscission in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 134:194–203
Pierik R, Whitelam GC, Voesenek LACJ, de Kroon H, Visser EJW. 2004. Canopy studies on ethylene-insensitive tobacco identify ethylene as a novel element in blue light and plant-plant signalling. Plant J 38:310–319
Rieske LK, Raffa KF. 1995. Ethylene emission by a deciduous tree, Tilia americana, in response to feeding by introduced basswood thrips, Thrips calcaratus. J Chem Ecol 21:187–197
Ruther J, Kleier S. 2005. Plant–plant signaling: ethylene synergizes volatile emission in Zea mays induced by exposure to (Z)-3-hexen-1-ol. J Chem Ecol 31:2217–2222
Schilmiller AL, Howe GA. 2005. Systemic signaling in the wound response. Curr Opin Plant Biol 8:369–377
Schmelz EA, Alborn HT, Banchio E, Tumlinson JH. 2003. Quantitative relationship between induced jasmonic acid levels and volatile emission in Zea mays during Spodoptera exigua herbivory. Planta 216:665–673
Schmelz EA, Caroll MJ, LeClere S, Phipps SM, Meredith J, et al. 2006. Fragments of ATP synthase mediate plant perception of insect attack. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:8894–8899
Schwachtje J, Minchin PEH, Jahnke S, Dongen JTv, Schittko U, et al. 2006. SNF1-related kinases allow plants to tolerate herbivory by allocating carbon to roots. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:12935–12940
Shoji T, Nakajima K, Hashimoto T. 2000. Ethylene suppresses jasmonate-induced gene expression in nicotine biosynthesis. Plant Cell Physiol 41:1072–1076
Steinite I, Gailite A, Ievinsh G. 2004. Reactive oxygen and ethylene are involved in the regulation of regurgitant-induced responses in bean plants. J Plant Physiol 161:191–196
Stotz HU, Pittendrigh BR, Kroymann J, Weniger K, Fritsche J, et al. 2000. Induced plant defense responses against chewing insects. Ethylene signaling reduces resistance of Arabidopsis against Egyptian cotton worm but not Diamondback moth. Plant Physiol 124:1007–1017
Turlings TCJ, Ton J. 2006. Exploiting scents of distress: the prospect of manipulating herbivore-induced plant odours to enhance the control of agricultural pests. Curr Opin Plant Biol 9:421–427
Watkins CB. 2006. The use of 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) on fruits and vegetables. Biotechnol Adv 24:389–409
Wien HC, Roesing C. 1980. Ethylene evolution by thrips-infested cowpea provides a basis for thrips resistance screening with ethephon sprays. Nature 283:192–194
Williamson CE. 1950. Ethylene, a metabolic product of diseased or injured plants. Phytopathology 40:205–208
Winz RA, Baldwin IT. 2001. Molecular interactions between the specialist herbivore Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae) and its natural host Nicotiana attenuata. 4. Insect-induced ethylene reduces jasmonate-induced nicotine accumulation by regulating putrescine N-methyltransferase transcripts. Plant Physiol 125:2189–2202
Acknowledgments
We thank Emily Wheeler, who improved the readability of the manuscript. This work was supported by the Max Planck Society.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
von Dahl, C.C., Baldwin, I.T. Deciphering the Role of Ethylene in Plant–Herbivore Interactions. J Plant Growth Regul 26, 201–209 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-007-0014-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-007-0014-4