Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of wind data from ERA-Interim and buoys in the Yellow and East China Seas

  • Physics
  • Published:
Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We compared data of sea surface wind from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Interim Reanalysis (ERA-Interim) with that collected from eight buoys deployed in the Yellow and East China seas. The buoy data covered a period from 2010 to 2011, during which the longest time series without missing data extended for 329 days. Results show that the ERA-Interim wind data agree well with the buoy data. The regression coefficients between the ERA-Interim and observed wind speed and direction are greater than 0.7 and 0.79, respectively. However, the ERA-Interim wind data overestimate wind speed at most of the buoy stations, for which the largest bias is 1.8 m/s. Moreover, it is found from scatter plots of wind direction that about 13% of the ERA-Interim wind data can be classified as bad for wind speeds below 6 m/s. Overall, the ERA-Interim data forecast both the wind speed and direction well, although they are not very representative of our observations, especially those where the wind speed is below 6 m/s.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brennan M J, Cobb III H D, Knabb R D. 2010. Observations of Gulf of Tehuantepec gap wind events from QuikSCAT: an updated event climatology and operational model evaluation. Wea. Forecasting, 25(2): 646–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carton J A, Giese B S. 2008. A reanalysis of ocean climate using Simple Ocean Data Assimilation (SODA). Mon. Wea. Rev., 136(8): 2 999–3 017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavaleri L, Bertotti L. 2004. Accuracy of the modelled wind and wave fields in enclosed seas. Tellus A, 56(2): 167–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chelton D B, Freilich M H. 2005. Scatterometer-based assessment of 10-m wind analyses from the operational ECMWF and NCEP numerical weather prediction models. Mon. Wea. Rev., 133: 409–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotton J. 2009. A comparison of QuikSCAT with buoy, ship and radar altimeter wind speeds and evaluating the need for a new bias correction. Met Office, Met R&D Technical Report 538.

  • Dee D P, Uppala S M, Simmons A J et al. 2011. The ERAInterim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Quarterly J. Royal Meteor. Soc., 137(656): 553–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong C, Oey L Y. 2005. Sensitivity of coastal currents near Point Conception to forcing by three different winds: ECMWF, COAMPS, and blended SSM/I-ECMWF-Buoy winds. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 35(7): 1 229–1 244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan X, Walsh J E, Krieger J R. 2008. A one-year experimental Arctic reanalysis and comparisons with ERA-40 and NCEP/NCAR reanalyses. Geophys. Res. Lett., 35(19).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, Song L, Wang F, Bai H. 2012. Comparison between QuikSCAT and buoy wind data in the north Yellow Sea, Marine Sci., 36: 1–7. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Parekh A, Sharma R, Sarkar A. 2007. A comparative assessment of surface wind speed and sea surface temperature over the Indian Ocean by TMI, MSMR, and ERA-40. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 24(6): 1 131–1 142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett M H, Tang W, Rosenfeld L K, Wash C H. 2003. QuikSCAT satellite comparisons with nearshore buoy wind data off the US west coast. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 20(12): 1 869–1 879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satheesan K, Sarkar A, Parekh A, Kumar M R, Kuroda Y. 2007. Comparison of wind data from QuikSCAT and buoys in the Indian Ocean. Int. J. Remote Sens., 28(10): 2 375–2 382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie S P, Hafner J, Tanimoto Y, Liu W T, Tokinaga H, Xu H. 2002. Bathymetric effect on the winter sea surface temperature and climate of the Yellow and East China Seas. Geophys. Res. Lett., 29(24): 81-1–81-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang D, Yin B, Liu Z, Bai T, Qi J, Chen H. 2012. Numerical study on the pattern and origins of Kuroshio branches in the bottom water of southern East China Sea in summer. J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans (1978–2012), 117(C2), http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011JC007528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang D, Yin B, Liu Z, Feng X. 2011. Numerical study of the ocean circulation on the East China Sea shelf and a Kuroshio bottom branch northeast of Taiwan in summer. J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans (1978–2012), 116(C5), http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010JC006777.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zou L, Zhou T, Li L, Zhang J. 2010. East China summer rainfall variability of 1958–2000: dynamical downscaling with a variable-resolution AGCM. J. Climate, 23(23): 6 394–6 408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhiliang Liu  (刘志亮).

Additional information

Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41276026), the Ocean Special Project (No. XDA11020301), and the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) (No. 2009CB421205)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, L., Liu, Z. & Wang, F. Comparison of wind data from ERA-Interim and buoys in the Yellow and East China Seas. Chin. J. Ocean. Limnol. 33, 282–288 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-015-3326-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-015-3326-4

Keyword

Navigation