Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of sperm dilution and gamete contact time on the fertilization rate of scleractinian corals

  • Report
  • Published:
Coral Reefs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study presents new information on the influence of sperm dilution on the fertilization rates of eight broadcast-spawning scleractinian coral species [three Acropora species and five merulinid species (three genera)]. The presented information nearly doubled the existing information, now totaling 17 species comprising eight acroporid species and nine merulinid species. No obvious differences in the fertilization rates were observed at the family and genus levels; furthermore, the fertilization curve estimated uniquely for Favites pentagona exhibited a strong sigmoid shape, indicating the existence of species-specific variation. In addition, a general fertilization response against sperm dilution was observed for the first time in broadcast-spawning scleractinian corals. The fertilization rate peaked (>75 %) at a sperm concentration of approximately 106 sperm mL−1 (optimal concentration) and rapidly declined to <50 % at a concentration of 104 sperm mL−1. The influence of gamete contact time (10, 30, and 60 min) on fertilization rates was also examined in two Acropora and four merulinid species, at the optimal sperm concentration. No influence of gamete contact time on fertilization rates was observed in two of the examined species (Acropora papillare and Platygyra ryukyuensis), whereas reduced fertilization rates occurred mostly in the 10-min treatment for the other species. These results suggested that broadcast-spawning scleractinian corals can rapidly fertilize, indicating that these corals have a fair chance of achieving high fertilization success in the field under optimal conditions. The sperm concentration values (e.g., 104 sperm mL−1, indicating <50 % fertilization rates) may be useful in estimating the success of in situ fertilization of broadcast-spawning scleractinian corals, particularly in degraded, low-density populations where the degree of fertilization success is of management concern. Information on the fertilization ecology of scleractinian corals remains insufficient, and further study is necessary to understand fertilization dynamics in the field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Albright R, Mason B (2013) Projected near-future levels of temperature and pCO2 reduce coral fertilization success. PLoS One 8:e56468

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bellwood DR, Hughes TP, Folke C, Nyström M (2004) Confronting the coral reef crisis. Nature 429:827–833

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Budd AF, Fukami H, Smith ND, Knowlton N (2012) Taxonomic classification of the reef coral family Mussidae (Cnidaria: Anthozoa: Scleractinia). Zool J Linn Soc 166:465–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chui APY, Wong MC, Liu SH, Lee GW, Chan SW, Lau PL, Leung SM, Ang P (2014) Gametogenesis, embryogenesis, and fertilization ecology of Platygyra acuta in marginal nonreefal coral communities in Hong Kong. J Mar Biol. doi:10.1155/2014/953587

    Google Scholar 

  • Coma R, Lasker HR (1997) Small-scale heterogeneity of fertilization success in a broadcast spawning octocoral. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 214:107–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai CF, Soong K, Fan TY (1992) Sexual reproduction of corals in northern and southern Taiwan. Proc 7th Int Coral Reef Symp 1:448–455

  • Fogarty ND, Vollmer SV, Levitan DR (2012) Weak prezygotic isolating mechanisms in threatened Caribbean Acropora corals. PLoS One 7:e30486

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fukami H, Chen CA, Budd AF, Collins A, Wallace C, Chuang YY, Chen C, Dai CF, Iwao K, Sheppard C, Knowlton N (2008) Mitochondrial and nuclear genes suggest that stony corals are monophyletic but most families of stony corals are not (Order Scleractinia, Class Anthozoa, Phylum Cnidaria). PLoS One 3:e3222

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner TA, Côté IM, Gill JA, Grant A, Watkinson AR (2003) Long-term region-wide declines in Caribbean corals. Science 301:958–960

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoegh-Guldberg O, Mumby PJ, Hooten AJ, Steneck RS, Greenfield P, Gomez E, Harvell CD, Sale PF, Edwards AJ, Caldeira K, Knowlton N, Eakin CM, Iglesias-Prieto R, Muthiga N, Bradbury RH, Dubi A, Hatziolos ME (2007) Coral reefs under rapid climate change and ocean acidification. Science 318:1737–1742

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huang D, Benzoni F, Fukami H, Knowlton N, Smith ND, Budd AF (2014) Taxonomic classification of the reef coral families Merulinidae, Montastraeidae, and Diploastraeidae (Cnidaria: Anthozoa: Scleractinia). Zool J Linn Soc 171:277–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iguchi A, Morita M, Nakajima Y, Nishikawa A, Miller D (2009) In vitro fertilization efficiency in coral Acropora digitifera. Zygote 17:225–227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Isomura N, Baba Y, Nagata S, Nonaka M, Yamamoto HH (2013) The relationship between genetic similarity and reproductive success in the branching coral Acropora intermedia. Mar Biol Res 9:181–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitan DR, Petersen C (1995) Sperm limitation in the sea. Trends Ecol Evol 10:228–231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levitan DR, Fukami H, Jara J, Kline D, McGovern TM, McGhee KE, Swanson CA, Knowlton N (2004) Mechanisms of reproductive isolation among sympatric broadcast-spawning corals of the Montastraea annularis species complex. Evolution 58:308–323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall D (2006) Reliably estimating the effect of toxicants on fertilization success in marine broadcast spawners. Mar Pollut Bull 52:734–738

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller K, Babcock R (1997) Conflicting morphological and reproductive species boundaries in the coral genus Platygyra. Biol Bull 192:98–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morita M, Nishikawa A, Nakajima A, Iguchi A, Sakai K, Takemura A, Okuno M (2006) Eggs regulate sperm flagellar motility initiation, chemotaxis and inhibition in the coral Acropora digitifera, A. gemmifera and A. tenuis. J Exp Biol 209:4574–4579

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura R, Ando W, Yamamoto H, Kitano M, Sato A, Nakamura M, Kayanne H, Omori M (2011) Corals mass-cultured from eggs and transplanted as juveniles to their native, remote coral reef. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 436:161–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okubo N, Yamamoto HH, Nakaya F, Okaji K (2010) Reproduction in cultured versus wild coral colonies: fertilization, larval oxygen consumption, and survival. Biol Bull 218:230–236

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver J, Babcock R (1992) Aspects of the fertilization ecology of broadcast spawning corals: sperm dilution effects and in situ measurements of fertilization. Biol Bull 183:409–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omori M, Fukami H, Kobinata H, Hatta M (2001) Significant drop of fertilization of Acropora corals in 1999: an after-effect of heavy coral bleaching? Limnol Oceanogr 46:704–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorson G (1950) Reproductive and larval ecology of marine bottom invertebrates. Biol Rev 25:1–45

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Veron JEN (2000) Corals of the world. Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville

    Google Scholar 

  • Veron JEN, Pichon M, Best MW (1977) Scleractinia of eastern Australia. Part II. Families Faviidae, Trachyphyliidea. Australian Institute of Marine Science, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra

  • Wallace CC (1999) Staghorn corals of the world: a revision of the coral genus Acropora (Scleractinia; Astrocoeniina; Acroporidae) worldwide, with emphasis on morphology, phylogeny and biogeography. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis BL, Babcock RC, Harrison PL, Wallace CC (1997) Experimental hybridization and breeding incompatibilities within the mating systems of mass spawning reef corals. Coral Reefs 16:S53–S65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yund PO (2000) How severe is sperm limitation in natural populations of marine free-spawners? Trends Ecol Evol 15:10–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the staff of the Lyudao Marine Research Station for their support and, particularly, Adriana Santacruz-Castro, Che-Hung Lin, Chih-Hsien Liu, Gina Yang, and Huai-Shin Hsieh for their assistance in the field. Comments from three anonymous reviewers improved the original manuscript. This study was funded by an internal research grant from Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, and a thematic research grant from Academia Sinica (23-2g).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoko Nozawa.

Additional information

Communicated by Biology Editor Dr. Line K. Bay

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 22 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nozawa, Y., Isomura, N. & Fukami, H. Influence of sperm dilution and gamete contact time on the fertilization rate of scleractinian corals. Coral Reefs 34, 1199–1206 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-015-1338-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-015-1338-3

Keywords

Navigation