Skip to main content
Log in

Successful methods for transplanting fragments of Acropora formosa and Acropora hyacinthus

  • Report
  • Published:
Coral Reefs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to establish a successful method for the transplantation of branching and tabular coral fragments, we tested the effects of orientations of attachment, seasons of transplantation, and size of fragments on survival, growth, and spawning using Acropora formosa and A. hyacinthus. Vertically attached, large-sized fragments of A. formosa showed 98–100% survival rate after 18 months. The fragments transplanted in August exhibited better survival than those transplanted in November. The larger fragments had the higher percentage of spawning. The fragments that spawned had lower growth rate, while those resorbed the oocytes carried at the time of transplantation showed higher growth rate, suggesting the trade-off between growth and reproduction. Half of the fragments spawned 1 month earlier than the donor colonies. Only the vertically attached fragments of A. hyacinthus fused to the substratum, and those transplanted in February showed 100% survival rate after 14 months, indicating that this species is well suited for transplantation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Auberson B (1982) Coral transplantation: an approach to the re-establishment of damaged reefs. Kalikasan Philipp J Biol 11:158–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird AH, Marshall PA (2002) Mortality, growth and reproduction in scleractinian corals following bleaching on the Great Barrier Reef. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 237:133–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Bak RPM, Engel MS (1979) Distribution, abundance and survival of juvenile hermatypic corals (Scleractinia) and the importance of life history strategies in the parent coral community. Mar Biol 54:341–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowden-Kerby A (1997) Coral transplantation in sheltered habitats using unattached fragments and cultured colonies. In: Proceedings of 8th international coral reef symposium Panama 2:2063–2068

  • Bruckner AW, Bruckner RJ (2001) Condition of restored Acropora palmata fragments off Mona Island, Puerto Rico, two years after the Fortuna Reefer ship grounding. Coral Reefs 20:235–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen G, Xiong S (1995) A study on the transplantation of reef-building corals in Sanya waters, Hainan province. Trop Oceanol 14(3):51–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark T (1997) Tissue regeneration rate of coral transplants in a wave exposed environment, Cape D’Aguilar, Hong Kong. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Coral Reef Symposium Panama 2:2069–2074

  • Clark S, Edwards AJ (1995) Coral transplantation as an aid to reef rehabilitation: evaluation of a case study in the Maldives Islands. Coral Reefs 14:201–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell J (1973) Population ecology of reef building corals. In: Jones OA, Endean R (eds) Biology and geology of coral reefs 2, biology 1. Academic, New York, pp 205–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Custodio III HM, Yap HT (1997) Skeletal extension rates of Porites cylindrica and Porites (Synaraea) rus after transplantation to two depths. Coral Reefs 16:267–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards AJ, Clark S (1998) Coral transplantation: A useful management tool or misguided meddling?. Mar Poll Bull 37:474–487

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • English S, Wilkinson C, Baker V (1997) Survey manual for tropical marine resources, 2nd edition. Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville

    Google Scholar 

  • Grassle JF (1973) Variety in coral communities. In: Jones OA, Endean R (eds.) Biology and geology of coral reefs, vol II, Biology 1. Academic, New York, pp 247–270

  • Harriott VJ, Fisk DA (1988) Coral transplantation as a reef management option. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Coral Reef Symposium, Australia 2:375–379

  • Hayashibara T, Shimoike K, Kimura T, Hosaka S, Heyward A, Harrison P, Kudo K, Omori M (1993) Patterns of coral spawning at Akajima Island, Okinawa, Japan. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 101:253–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Highsmith RC (1982) Reproduction by fragmentation in corals. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 7:207–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwao K (2001) Observation of oceanographic data at Akajima Island from 1995–2000 (in Japanese). Midoriishi 12:21–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Kojis BL, Quinn NJ (1985) Puberty in Goniastrea favulus: age or size limited? Proceedings of the 5th International Coral Reef Congress, Tahiti 4:289–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Marine Parks Center of Japan (1995) Research report on rehabilitation methodology of coral reef ecosystems. Environment Agency Contract Research Report, 87p

  • National Astronomical Observatory (2000) Chronological Scientific Tables 2000. Maruzen Co., Ltd, 1064p

  • Nishihira M, Veron JEN (1995) Hermatypic corals of Japan. Kaiyusya publishers Co., Ltd, 439p

  • Okubo N (2003) Development of underwater techniques for coral reef restoration, experiment 6–2. In: Study on the disturbance and restoration of the coral reef (in Japanese). Research and Information Office, Global Environment Bureau, Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan summary report of research results global environment research fund in 2002, pp 185–193

  • Okubo N, Omori M (2001) The review of coral transplantation around the world (in Japanese with English abstract). Galaxea 3:31–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Omori M, Okubo N (2004) Previous research and undertaking of coral reefs restoration. In: Omori M, Fujiwara S (eds) Manual for restoration and remediation of coral reefs. Nature Conservation Bureau Ministry of the Environment, Japan, pp 3–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Plucer-Rosario GP, Randall RH (1987) Preservation of rare coral species by transplantation: an examination of their recruitment and growth. Bull Mar Sci 41:585–593

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinkevich B, Loya Y (1989) Reproduction in regenerating colonies of the coral Stylophora pistillata. In: Spanier E, Steinberger Y, Luria M (eds) environmental quality and ecosystem stability, vol IVB. Environmental quality. Israel Society for Environmental Quality Sciences Publication, Jerusalem Israel, pp 259–265

  • Sheppard CRC (1981) The reef and soft-substrate coral fauna of Chagos, Indian Ocean. J Nat Hist 15:607–621

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith LD, Hughes TP (1999) An experimental assessment of survival, re-attachment and fecundity of coral fragments. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 235:147–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szmant-Froelich A (1985) The effect of colony size on the reproductive ability of the Caribbean coral Montastrea annularis (Ellis and Solander). In: Proceedings of 5th International Coral Reef Symposium 4:295–300

  • Taniguchi H (2001) Measurements of time-averaged intensity of water motion around Akajima Island (in Japanese). Midoriishi 12:18–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Taniguchi H, Iwao K, Omori M (1999) Coral bleaching around Akajima, Okinawa I. A report of the September 1998 survey (in Japanese with English abstract). Galaxea, JCRS 1:59–64

  • Veron JEN (2000) Corals of the world, vol 1. Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville

  • Ward S (1995) Two patterns of energy allocation for growth, reproduction and lipid storage in the scleractinia coral Pocillopora damicornis. Coral Reefs 14: 87–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yap HT, Gomez ED (1984) Growth of Acropora pulchra. Responses of natural and transplanted colonies to temperature and day length. Mar Biol 87:209–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yap HT, Aliño PM, Gomez ED (1992) Trends in growth and mortality of three coral species (Anthozoa: Scleractinia), including effects of transplantation. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 83:91–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Yap HT, Alvarez RM, Custodio HM, Dizon RM (1998) Physiological and ecological aspects of coral transplantation. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 229:69–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zakai D, Levy O, Chadwick-Furman NE (2000) Experimental fragmentation reduces sexual reproductive output by the reef-building coral Pocillopora damicornis. Coral Reefs. 19:185–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to K. Shimoike and the staff members of the Akajima Marine Science Laboratory for their kind help during the fieldwork, and to S. Hosaka for his continuous support and encouragements. We thank J.R. Strickler for valuable comments and support to our manuscript; B.G. Hatcher and two anonymous reviewers for editing and for helpful comments, M. Hatta and T. Kokita for providing many useful suggestions; M. Omori for valuable advice and comments as our supervisor.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nami Okubo.

Additional information

Communicated by Environmental Editor B.G. Hatcher

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Okubo, N., Taniguchi, H. & Motokawa, T. Successful methods for transplanting fragments of Acropora formosa and Acropora hyacinthus. Coral Reefs 24, 333–342 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-005-0496-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-005-0496-0

Keywords

Navigation