Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Coral reef rehabilitation through transplantation of staghorn corals: effects of artificial stabilization and mechanical damages

  • Report
  • Published:
Coral Reefs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to develop and test a low-cost method of coral reef rehabilitation, the staghorn corals Acropora muricata and A. vaughani were transplanted to a shallow site with unstable substrate. To avoid abrasion, dislodgement and transport due to water movement, the transplanted corals were tied to string sections, which were connected at the seabed to form a grid. This created stability and improved the survival of the corals. The average increase in weight of live coral over 1 year was 56%, eight times more than the control treatment with unattached coral branches. This difference was mainly due to a reduced partial mortality among smaller coral fragments in the stabilized treatment. Survival was positively related to initial size among the loosely placed coral branches, whereas the attached treatment showed a negative relation between size and relative increase in weight of the surviving parts of the coral branches. Coral fragments were not significantly affected by severe physical damage simulating the effects of handling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alcala AC, Gomez ED (1979) Recolonization and growth of hermatypic corals in dynamite-blasted coral reefs in the central Visayas, Philippines. In: Proc Int Symp Mar Biogeogr EYOI S Hemisphere, pp 645-661

  • Alcala AC, Gomez ED (1987) Dynamiting coral reefs for fish: a resource-destructive fishing method In: Salvat B (ed) Human impacts on coral reefs: facts and recommendations. Antenne Museum, French Polynesia, pp 51-60

  • Auberson B (1982) Coral transplantation: an approach to the reestablishment of damaged reefs. Kalikasan 11:158-172

    Google Scholar 

  • Berker LC, Mueller E (1999) The culture, transplantation and storage of Montastrea faveolata, Acropora cervicornis and A. palmata: what we have learned so far. In: Proc Int Conf on Scientific Aspects of Coral Reef Assessment, Monitoring and Restoration, National Coral Reef Institute, Florida, USA

  • Birkeland C, Randall RH, Grimm G (1979) Three methods of coral transplantation for the purpose of reestablishing a coral community in the thermal effluent area at the Tanguisson power plant. Tech Rep 60, University of Guam

  • Blanchon P, Jones B, Kalbfleisch W (1997) Anatomy of a fringing reef around Grand Cayman: storm rubble, not coral framework. J Sediment Res 67:1-16

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowden-Kerby A (1997) Coral transplantation in sheltered habitats using unattached fragments and cultured colonies. Proc 8th Int Coral Reef Symp 2:2063-2068

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown BE, Dunne RP (1988) The environmental impact of coral mining on coral reefs in the Maldives. Environ Conserv 15:159-166

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruno JF (1998) Fragmentation in Madracis mirabilis (Duchassaing and Michelotti): how common is size-specific fragment survivorship in corals? J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 230:169-181

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter KE, Alcala AC (1977) Muro-ami and Kayakas reef fisheries, benefit or bane? Philipp J Fish 15:217-135

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark S, Edwards AJ (1995) Coral transplantation as an aid to reef rehabilitation: evaluation of a case study in the Maldive Islands. Coral Reefs 14:201-213

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell JH (1973) Population ecology of reef-building corals. In: Jones OA, Endean R (eds) Biology and geology of coral reefs. Academic Press, London

  • Edwards AJ, Clark S (1999) Coral transplantation: a useful management tool or misguided meddling? Mar Pollut Bull 37:474-487

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox HE, Pet JS, Daburi R, Caldwell RL (2000) Recovery in rubble fields: long term impacts of blast fishing. Proc 9th Int Coral Reef Symp

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore MD, Hall BR (1976) Life history, grow habits and constructional roles of Acropora cervicornis in the patch reef environment. J Sediment Petrol 46:519-522

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzman HM (1991) Restoration of coral reefs in Pacific Costa Rica. Conserv Biol 5:189-195

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall VR (1997) Interspecific differences in the regeneration of artificial injuries on scleractinian corals. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 212:9-23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harriott VJ, Fisk DA (1988a) Accelerated regeneration of hard corals: a manual for coral reef users and managers. Tech Memo 16, Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority,

  • Harriott VJ, Fisk DA (1988b) Coral transplantation as a reef management option. Proc 6th Int Coral Reef Symp, pp 375-379

  • Highsmith RC (1982) Reproduction by fragmentation in corals. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 7:207-226

    Google Scholar 

  • Highsmith RC, Riggs AC, D'Antonio CM (1980) Survival of hurricane-generated coral (Acropora palmata) fragments and a disturbance model of reef calcification growth rates. Oecologia 46(3):322-329

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildemann WH, Linthicum DS, Vann DC (1975) Transplantation and immunoincompatibility reactions among reef-building corals. Immunogenetics 2:269-284

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson JH (2000) History and use of quick-setting Portland cement to transplant corals: two decades of proof that it works. Proc 9th Int Coral Reef Symp

  • Hudson JH, Diaz R (1988) Damage survey and restoration of MN Wellwood grounding site, Molasses Reef, Key Largo National Marine Sanctuary. Proc 6th Int Coral Reef Symp 1:231-236

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes TP, Jackson JBC (1985) Population dynamics and life histories of foliaceous corals. Ecol Monogr 55(2):141-166

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaly UL (1995) Experimental test of the effects of methods of attachment and handling on the rapid transplantation of corals. Tech Rep1, CRC Reef Research Centre, Townsville, Australia

  • Knowlton N, Lang JC, Keller BD (1988) Fates of staghorn coral isolates on hurricane-damaged reefs in Jamaica: the role of predators. Proc 6th Int Coral Reef Symp 2:83-88

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobayashi A (1984) Regeneration and regrowth of fragmented colonies of the hermatypic corals Acropora formosa and Acropora nasuta. Galaxia 3:13-23

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis JB (1991) Testing the coral fragment size-dependent survivorship hypothesis for the calcareous hydrozoan Millepora complanata. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 70:101

    Google Scholar 

  • Liddle MJ, Kay AM (1987) Resistance, survival and recovery of trampled corals on the Great Barrier Reef. Biol Conserv 42:1-18

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindahl U (1998) Low-tech rehabilitation of degraded coral reefs through transplantation of staghorn corals. Ambio 27:645-650

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindahl U, Öhman MC, Schelten CK (2001) The 1997/1998 mass mortality of corals: effects on fish communities on a Tanzanian coral reef. Mar Pollut Bull 42(2):127

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maragos JE (1974) Coral transplantation: a method to create, preserve and manage coral reefs. UNIHI-SEAGRANT-AR-74-03, CORMAR-14, University of Hawaii

    Google Scholar 

  • Maragos JE (1978) Coral growth: geometrical relationships. In: Stoddart DR, Johannes RE (eds) Coral reef research methods. UNESCO, Paris, pp 543–550

  • Nagelkerken I, Bouma S, van den Akker S, Bak RPM (2000) Growth and survival of unattached Madracis mirabilis fragments transplanted to different reef sites, and the implication for reef rehabilitation. Bull Mar Sci 66(2):497-505

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman HN, Chuan CS (1994) Transplanting a coral reef: a Singapore community project. Coast Manage Tropical Asia 3:11-14

    Google Scholar 

  • Plucer-Rosario G, Randall RH (1987) Preservation of rare coral species by transplantation and examination of their recruitment and growth. Bull Mar Sci 41:585-593

    Google Scholar 

  • Riegl B, Luke KE (1998) Ecological parameters of dynamited reefs in the northern Red Sea and their relevance to reef rehabilitation. Mar Pollut Bull 37:488-498

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rinkevich B (2000) Steps toward the evaluation of coral reef restoration by using small branch fragments. Mar Biol 136:807-812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rinkevich B, Loya Y (1985) Intraspecific competition in a reef coral: effects on growth and reproduction. Oecologia 66:100-105

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers CS, Suchanek TH, Pecora FA (1982) Effects of Hurricanes David and Frederick (1979) on shallow Acropora palmata reef communities: St Croix, US Virgin Islands. Bull Mar Sci 32:532-548

    Google Scholar 

  • Sano M, Shimizu M, Nose Y (1987) Long-term effects of destruction of hermatypic corals by Acanthaster planci infestation on reef fish communities at Iriomote Island, Japan. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 37:191-199

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher H, Schillak L (1994) Integrated electrochemical and biogenic deposition of hard material—a nature–like colonization substrate. Bull Mar Sci 55:672-679

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith LD, Hughes TP (1999) An experimental assessment of survival, re-attachment and fecundity of coral fragments. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 235:147-164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spurgeon JPG, Lindahl U (2000) Economics of coral reef restoration. In: Cesar H (ed) Collected essays on the economics of coral reefs. CORDIO, Kalmar University, Kalmar, Sweden, pp 125-136

  • Tomlinson D, Pratt R (1999) Commercial applications of coral reef restoration. In: Proc Int Conf on Scientific Aspects of Coral Reef Assessment, Monitoring and Restoration, National Coral Reef Institute, Florida, USA

  • Tunnicliffe V (1981) Breakage and propagation of the stony coral Acropora cervicornis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:2427-2431

    Google Scholar 

  • Yap HT, Gomez ED (1984) Growth of Acropora pulchra II. Responses of natural and transplanted colonies to temperature and day length. Mar Biol 81:209-215

    Google Scholar 

  • Yap HT, Alino PM, Gomez ED (1992) Trends in growth and mortality of three coral species (Anthozoa: Scleractinia), including effects of transplantation. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 83:91-101

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was carried out in co-operation with the Institute of Marine Sciences, Tanzania. I would also like to thank D. DeVilliers, K. Gallop, J. Greupner, H. Trattner, and M. Willson for assistance in the field. Dr. K. Johannesson, O. Lindén, J.-O. Strömberg, and anonymous referees gave valuable comments on the manuscript. Funding was provided by the Swedish International Development Co-operation Agency (Sida) through the Sarec Marine Science Program and by Göteborg University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Kristineberg Marine Research Station, 450 34 , Fiskebackskil, Sweden

    U. Lindahl

Authors
  1. U. Lindahl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to U. Lindahl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lindahl, U. Coral reef rehabilitation through transplantation of staghorn corals: effects of artificial stabilization and mechanical damages. Coral Reefs 22, 217–223 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-003-0305-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-003-0305-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation