Abstract
Reconstruction of crop sowing time and cultivation intensity, based on arable weed ecology, can resolve archaeological questions surrounding land use and cycles of routine activity, but crop processing may introduce systematic ecological biases in the arable weeds represented in products and by-products. Based on previous ethnoarchaeological work, there is a predicted bias against indicators of spring sowing and intensive cultivation in fine sieve products (and a corresponding over-representation of such species in by-products). Recent work on modern weed floras using functional weed ecology has identified distinctive functional attributes associated with different sowing regimes and cultivation intensity levels. Evaluation of the predicted biases using functional attribute data for modern weed survey studies of different sowing regimes (in Germany) and cultivation intensity levels (in Greece) suggests that there is a likely bias against spring sowing indicators in fine sieve products but not (apparently) against intensive cultivation indicators. An archaeological case study is presented in order to illustrate how bias relating to crop sowing time may be identified and interpreted.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Behre, K.-E., Jacomet, S. (1991). The ecological interpretation of archaeobotanical data. In: van Zeist, W., Wasylikowa, K., Behre, K.-E. (eds) Progress in old world palaeoethnobotany. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 81–108
Bogaard, A. (2004). Neolithic farming in central Europe. Routledge, London
Bogaard, A., Jones, G., Charles, M., Hodgson, J.G. (2001). On the archaeobotanical inference of crop sowing time using the FIBS method. Journal of Archaeological Science, 28, 1171–1183
Ellenberg, H. (1996). Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen in ökologischer, dynamischer und historischer Sicht. Ulmer, Stuttgart
Hillman, G.C. (1984). Interpretation of archaeological plant remains: the application of ethnographic models from Turkey. In: van Zeist, W., Casparie, W.A. (eds) Plants and ancient man. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 1–42
Hodgson, J.G. (1989). Selecting and managing plant materials used in habitat construction. In: Buckley, G.P. (ed) Biological habitat reconstruction. Belhaven, London, pp 45–67
Hodgson, J.G. (1990). The role of autecological accounts. In: Hillier, S.H., Walton, D.W.H., Wells, D.A. (eds) Calcareous grasslands—ecology and management. Bluntisham, Huntingdon, pp 161–168
Hodgson, J.G. (1991). The use of ecological theory and autecological datasets in studies of endangered plant and animal species and communities. Pirineos, 138, 3–28
Hodgson, J.G., Grime, J.P. (1990). The role of dispersal mechanisms, regenerative strategies and seed banks in the vegetation dynamics of the British landscape. In: Bunce, R.G.H., Howard, D.C. (eds) Species dispersal in agricultural habitats. Belhaven, London, pp 65–81
Hüppe, J., Hofmeister, H. (1990). Syntaxonomische Fassung und Übersicht über die Ackerunkrautgesellschaften der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Berichte der Reinhardt Tüxen-Gesellschaft, 2, 61–81
Jones, G. (1984). Interpretation of archaeological plant remains: ethnographic models from Greece. In: van Zeist, W., Casparie, W.A. (eds) Plants and ancient man. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 43–61
Jones, G. (1987). A statistical approach to the identification of crop processing. Journal of Archaeological Science, 14, 311–323
Jones, G. (1990). The application of present-day cereal processing studies to charred archaeobotanical remains. Circaea, 6, 91–96
Jones, G. (1992). Weed phytosociology and crop husbandry: identifying a contrast between ancient and modern practice. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, 73, 133–143
Jones, G. (2002). Weed ecology as a method for the archaeobotanical recognition of crop husbandry practices. Acta Palaeobotanica, 42, 185–193
Jones, G., Bogaard, A., Halstead, P., Charles, M., Smith, H. (1999). Identifying the intensity of crop husbandry practices on the basis of weed floras. Annual of the British School at Athens, 94, 167–189
Jones, G., Bogaard, A., Charles, M., Hodgson, J.G. (2000). Distinguishing the effects of agricultural practices relating to fertility and disturbance: a functional ecological approach in archaeobotany. Journal of Archaeological Science, 27, 1073–1084
Thompson, K., Band, S.R., Hodgson, J.G. (1993). Seed size and shape predict persistence in soil. Functional Ecology, 7, 236–241
van der Veen, M. (1992). Crop husbandry regimes: an archaeobotanical study of farming in northern England. Collis, Sheffield
Wasylikowa, K. (1981). The role of fossil weeds for the study of former agriculture. Zeitschrift für Archäologie, 15, 11–23
Acknowledgements
Functional ecological analysis of the modern weed survey studies in Greece and Germany was supported by the Natural Environment Research Council. A. Bogaard would also like to thank the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, the Overseas Research Fund and the University of Sheffield for doctoral funding
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bogaard, A., Jones, G. & Charles, M. The impact of crop processing on the reconstruction of crop sowing time and cultivation intensity from archaeobotanical weed evidence. Veget Hist Archaeobot 14, 505–509 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-005-0061-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-005-0061-3