Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Microwave ablation versus surgical resection for subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score–matched study of long-term therapeutic outcomes

  • Oncology
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The therapeutic efficacy of microwave ablation (MWA) for subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has not been well characterized. We aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of MWA and surgical resection (SR) in patients with subcapsular HCC.

Methods

This retrospective study comprised 321 patients with subcapsular HCC meeting the Milan criteria who received MWA (n = 99) or SR (n = 222). Local tumor progression (LTP), overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed using propensity score matching (PSM) to compare the therapeutic efficacy.

Results

In the total cohort, there were no significant differences in 5-year LTP rates (14.0% vs. 8.9%, p = 0.12), OS rates (70.7% vs. 73.2%, p = 0.63), and DFS rates (38.3% vs. 41.2%, p = 0.22) between the MWA and SR groups. After PSM, the cumulative LTP rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 9.7%, 14.0%, and 16.4% in the MWA group (n = 84) and 7.2%, 8.6%, and 10.6% in the SR group (n = 84), respectively, with no significant difference (p = 0.31). Neither corresponding OS rates (96.4%, 84.8%, and 73.0% vs. 95.2%, 85.5%, and 72.1%, p = 0.89) nor DFS rates (76.0%, 52.6%, and 38.1% vs. 76.2%, 44.7%, and 32.3%, p = 0.43) were significantly different between the MWA and SR groups. Whereas MWA obtained fewer complications for both cohorts (both p < 0.05).

Conclusion

MWA showed comparable long-term therapeutic outcomes to SR, and it might be an alternative curative option for subcapsular HCC within the Milan criteria.

Key Points

• Microwave ablation showed comparable local tumor progression, overall survival, and disease-free survival to surgical resection for subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma meeting the Milan criteria.

• Microwave ablation obtained fewer complications and shorter postoperative hospital stay.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ALBI:

Albumin-bilirubin

DFS:

Disease-free survival

HCC:

Hepatocellular carcinoma

LTP:

Local tumor progression

MWA:

Microwave ablation

OS:

Overall survival

PSM:

Propensity score matching

SR:

Surgical resection

References

  1. European Association for the Study of the Liver (2018) EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 69:182-236

  2. Heimbach JK, Kulik LM, Finn RS et al (2018) AASLD guidelines for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 67:358–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ito T, Tanaka S, Iwai S et al (2016) Outcomes of laparoscopic hepatic resection versus percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma located at the liver surface: a case-control study with propensity score matching. Hepatol Res 46:565–574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chong CCN, Lee KF, Chu CM et al (2018) Microwave ablation provides better survival than liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with borderline liver function: application of ALBI score to patient selection. HPB (Oxford) 20:546–554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mohkam K, Dumont PN, Manichon AF et al (2018) No-touch multibipolar radiofrequency ablation vs. surgical resection for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma ranging from 2 to 5cm. J Hepatol 68:1172–1180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang M, Ma H, Zhang J, He L, Ye X, Li X (2017) Comparison of microwave ablation and hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Onco Targets Ther 10:4829–4839

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Zheng H, Xu C, Wang X et al (2020) Microwave ablation shows similar survival outcomes compared with surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma between 3 and 5 cm. Int J Hyperthermia 37:1345–1353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kang TW, Lim HK, Lee MW et al (2016) Long-term therapeutic outcomes of radiofrequency ablation for subcapsular versus nonsubcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matched study. Radiology 280:300–312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yao J, Liu B, Wang X et al (2022) Long-term efficacy of microwave ablation in the treatment of subcapsular hepatocellular carcinomas of </=3 cm in diameter: a multicenter, propensity score-matched study. Int J Hyperthermia 39:209–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu F, Yu X, Cheng Z et al (2017) Comparison of ultrasonography-guided percutaneous microwave ablation for subcapsular and nonsubcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Radiol 91:93–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. An C, Cheng Z, Yu X et al (2020) Ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma in challenging locations: oncologic outcomes and advanced assistive technology. Int J Hyperthermia 37:89–100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zheng H, Liu K, Yang Y et al (2022) Microwave ablation versus radiofrequency ablation for subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score-matched study. Eur Radiol 32:4657–4666

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Feng Y, Wang L, Lv H et al (2021) Microwave ablation versus radiofrequency ablation for perivascular hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score analysis. HPB (Oxford) 23:512–519

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin CH, Ho CM, Wu CH et al (2020) Minimally invasive surgery versus radiofrequency ablation for single subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma </=2 cm with compensated liver cirrhosis. Surg Endosc 34:5566–5573

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee JW, Kim S, Kwack SW et al (2008) Hepatic capsular and subcapsular pathologic conditions: demonstration with CT and MR imaging. Radiographics 28:1307–1323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML et al (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cohen J (1992) A power primer. Psychol Bull 112:155–159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu W, Zheng Y, He W et al (2018) Microwave vs radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria: a propensity score analysis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 48:671–681

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dou J, Cheng Z, Han Z et al (2021) Microwave ablation vs. surgical resection for treatment naïve hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria: a follow-up of at least 5 years. Cancer Biol Med. https://doi.org/10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2020.0625

  21. Feng H, Yang C, Xu F et al (2022) Therapeutic efficacy of microwave coagulation versus liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria: a propensity score matching analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 48:418–424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang Z, Liu M, Zhang DZ et al (2022) Microwave ablation versus laparoscopic resection as first-line therapy for solitary 3–5 cm HCC. Hepatology 76:66–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mukund A, Ramalingam R, Anandpara KM, Patidar Y, Vijayaraghavan R, Sarin SK (2020) Efficacy and safety of percutaneous microwave ablation for hepatocellular carcinomas <4 cm in difficult location. Br J Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20191025

  24. Makovich Z, Logemann J, Chen L et al (2021) Liver tumor ablation in difficult locations: microwave ablation of perivascular and subdiaphragmatic hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Imaging 71:170–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hori T, Nagata K, Hasuike S et al (2003) Risk factors for the local recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after a single session of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation. J Gastroenterol 38:977–981

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Komorizono Y, Oketani M, Sako K et al (2003) Risk factors for local recurrence of small hepatocellular carcinoma tumors after a single session, single application of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation. Cancer 97:1253–1262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yang B, Zou J, Xia J et al (2011) Risk factors for recurrence of small hepatocellular carcinoma after long-term follow-up of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation. Eur J Radiol 79:196–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yu J, Liang P, Yu X, Liu F, Chen L, Wang Y (2011) A comparison of microwave ablation and bipolar radiofrequency ablation both with an internally cooled probe: results in ex vivo and in vivo porcine livers. Eur J Radiol 79:124–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Qi E, Zhang S, Li X et al (2022) Comparison of percutaneous microwave ablation and surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in the caudate lobe. J Cancer Res Ther 18:378–383

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hasegawa K, Kokudo N, Makuuchi M et al (2013) Comparison of resection and ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a cohort study based on a Japanese nationwide survey. J Hepatol 58:724–729

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Feng Y, Wu H, Huang DQ et al (2020) Radiofrequency ablation versus repeat resection for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (</=5 cm) after initial curative resection. Eur Radiol 30:6357–6368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Pompili M, Saviano A, de Matthaeis N et al (2013) Long-term effectiveness of resection and radiofrequency ablation for single hepatocellular carcinoma </=3 cm. Results of a multicenter Italian survey. J Hepatol 59:89–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Shi J, Sun Q, Wang Y et al (2014) Comparison of microwave ablation and surgical resection for treatment of hepatocellular carcinomas conforming to Milan criteria. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 29:1500–1507

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Toyoda H, Lai PB, O'Beirne J et al (2016) Long-term impact of liver function on curative therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: application of the ALBI grade. Br J Cancer 114:744–750

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Sun Q, Shi J, Ren C, Du Z, Shu G, Wang Y (2020) Survival analysis following microwave ablation or surgical resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma conforming to the Milan criteria. Oncol Lett 19:4066–4076

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Yang G, Xiong Y, Sun J et al (2020) The efficacy of microwave ablation versus liver resection in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 77:85–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Liu W, Zou R, Wang C et al (2019) Microwave ablation versus resection for hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria: a propensity-score analysis. Ther Adv Med Oncol 11:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported in part by the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (No. ZR2020MH285).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xinya Zhao.

Ethics declarations

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Dr. Xinya Zhao.

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Statistics and biometry

No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.

Methodology

• retrospective

• observational

• multicenter study

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

ESM 1

(DOCX 28 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, K., Zheng, H., Sui, X. et al. Microwave ablation versus surgical resection for subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score–matched study of long-term therapeutic outcomes. Eur Radiol 33, 1938–1948 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-09135-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-09135-1

Keywords

Navigation