Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Nyquist sampling theorem and Bosniak classification, version 2019: effect of thin axial sections on categorization and agreement

  • Urogenital
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To determine if CT axial images reconstructed at current standard of care (SOC; 2.5–3 mm) or thin (≤ 1 mm) sections affect categorization and inter-rater agreement of cystic renal masses assessed with Bosniak classification, version 2019.

Methods

In this retrospective single-center study, 3 abdominal radiologists reviewed 131 consecutive cystic renal masses from 100 patients performed with CT renal mass protocol from 2015 to 2021. Images were reviewed in two sessions: first with SOC and then the addition of thin sections. Individual and overall categorizations are reported, latter of which is based on majority opinion with 3-way discrepancies resolved by a fourth reader. Major categorization changes were defined as differences between classes I–II, IIF, or III–IV.

Results

Thin sections led to a statistically significant major category change with class II for all readers individually (p = 0.004–0.041; McNemar test), upgrading 10–17% of class II masses, most commonly to class IIF followed by III. Modal reason for upgrades was due to identification of additional septa followed by larger measurement of enhancing features. Masses categorized as class I, III, or IV on SOC sections were unaffected, as were identification of protrusions. Inter-rater agreements using weighted Cohen’s kappa were 0.679 for SOC and 0.691 for thin sections (both substantial).

Conclusion

Thin axial sections upgraded up to one in six class II masses to IIF or III through identification of additional septa or larger feature. Other classes, including III–IV, were unaffected. Inter-rater agreements were substantial regardless of section thickness.

Key Points

• Thin axial sections (≤ 1 mm) compared to standard of care sections (2.5–3 mm) led to identification of additional septa but did not affect identification of protrusions.

• Thin axial sections (≤ 1 mm) compared to standard of care sections (2.5–3 mm) can upgrade a small proportion of cystic renal masses from class II to IIF or III when applying Bosniak classification, version 2019.

• Inter-rater agreements were substantial regardless of section thickness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

v2019:

Bosniak classification, version 2019

SOC:

Standard of care

References

  1. Bosniak MA (1986) The current radiological approach to renal cysts. Radiology 158(1):1–10

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bosniak MA (1997) The use of Bosniak classification system for renal cysts and cystic tumors. J Urol 5(157):1852–1853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schoots IG, Zaccai K, Hunink MG, Verhagen PCMS (2017) Bosniak classification for complex renal cysts reevaluated: a systematic review. J Urol 198(1):12–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Campbell SC, Clark PE, Chang SS, Karam JA, Souter L, Uzzo RG (2021) Renal mass and localized renal cancer: evaluation, management, and follow-up: AUA guideline: Part I. J Urol 206(2):199–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Campbell SC, Clark PE, Chang SS, Karam JA, Souter L, Uzzo RG (2021) Renal mass and localized renal cancer: evaluation, management, and follow-up: AUA guideline: Part II. J Urol 206(2):209–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Silverman SG, Pedrosa IP, Ellis JH et al (2019) Bosniak classification of cystic renal masses, version 2019: an update proposal and needs assessment. Radiology 292(2):475–488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shannon CE (1998) Communication in the presence of noise. Proc IEEE 86(2):447–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang ZJ, Davenport MS, Silverman SG et al CT renal mass protocols v1.0. Society of Abdominal Radiology Disease Focused Panel on Renal Cell Carcinoma. Available via https://abdominalradiology.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/RCC.CTprotocolsfinal-7-15-17.pdf. Accessed October 24, 2021.

  9. Fuhrman SA, Lasky LC, Limas C (1982) Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 6(7):655–663

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zigeuner R, Hutterer G, Chromecki T et al (2010) External validation of the Mayo Clinic stage, size, grade, and necrosis (SSIGN) score for clear-cell renal cell carcinoma in a single European centre applying routine pathology. Eur Urol 57(1):102–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Beddy P, Genega EM, Ngo L (2014) Tumor necrosis on magnetic resonance imaging correlates with aggressive histology and disease progression in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer 12:55–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tse JR, Shen L, Shen J, Yoon L, Kamaya A (2021) Prevalence of malignancy and histopathologic association of Bosniak classification, version 2019 class III and IV cystic renal masses. J Urol 205(4):1031–1038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Parker WP, Cheville JC, Frank I et al (2017) Application of the stage, size, grade, and necrosis (SSIGN) score for clear cell renal cell carcinoma in contemporary patients. Eur Urol 71(4):665–673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Curry NS, Cochran ST, Bissada NK (2000) Cystic renal masses: accurate Bosniak classification requires adequate renal CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175(3):39–342

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bosniak MA (1997) Diagnosis and management of patients with complicated cystic lesions of the kidney. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169:819–821

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Israel GM, Hindman N, Bosniak MA (2004) Evaluation of cystic renal masses: comparison of CT and MR imaging by using the Bosniak classification system. Radiology 231:365–371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rankin SC, Webb JA, Reznek RH (2000) Spiral computed tomography in the diagnosis of renal masses. BJU Int 86:48–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Siegel CL, McFarland EG, Brink JA, Fisher AJ, Humphrey P, Heiken JP (1997) CT of cystic renal masses: analysis of diagnostic performance and interobserver variation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169:813–818

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bertolotto M, Zappetti R, Cavallaro M, Perrone R, Perretti L, Cova MA (2010) Characterization of atypical cystic renal masses with MDCT: comparison of 5-mm axial images and thin multiplanar reconstructed images. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:693–700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yan JH, Chan J, Osman H et al (2021) Bosniak classification version 2019: validation and comparison to original classification in pathologically confirmed cystic masses. Eur Radiol 31(12):9579–9587

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tse JR, Shen J, Yoon L, Kamaya A (2020) Bosniak classification version 2019 of cystic renal masses assessed with MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 215:413–419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bai X, Sun SM, Xu W et al (2020) MRI-based Bosniak classification of cystic renal masses, version 2019: interobserver agreement, impact of readers’ experience, and diagnostic performance. Radiology 297(3):597–605

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chan J, Yan JH, Munir J et al (2021) Comparison of Bosniak classification of cystic renal masses version 2019 assessed by CT and MRI. Abdom Radiol (NY) 46:5268–6276

  24. Tse JR, Shen J, Shen L, Yoon L, Kamaya A (2021) Bosniak classification of cystic renal masses version 2019: comparison of categorization using CT and MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 216:412–420

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Shampain KL, Shankar PR, Troost JP et al (2021) Interrater agreement of Bosniak classification version 2019 and version 2005 for cystic renal masses at CT and MRI. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2021210853

Download references

Funding

The authors state that this work has not received any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Justin R. Tse.

Ethics declarations

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Justin Tse.

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Statistics and biometry

One of the authors has significant statistical expertise.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.

Study subjects or cohorts overlap

A total of 9 study subjects or cohorts have been previously reported in: Tse JR, Shen L, Shen J, Yoon L, Kamaya A. Prevalence of malignancy and histopathologic association of Bosniak classification, version 2019 class III and IV cystic renal masses. J Urol 2021; 205(4):1031-1038. There is an approximately 15-month interval between image analysis of the current study and the above study.

Methodology

• Retrospective

• Observational

• Performed at one institution

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(DOCX 84 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tse, J.R., Shen, L., Shen, J. et al. Nyquist sampling theorem and Bosniak classification, version 2019: effect of thin axial sections on categorization and agreement. Eur Radiol 32, 8256–8265 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08876-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08876-3

Keywords

Navigation