Skip to main content
Log in

Excessive z-axis scan coverage in body CT: frequency and causes

  • Computed Tomography
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study was to determine the frequency and causing factors of excessive z-axis coverage in body CT examinations.

Methods

A total of 2032 body CT examinations performed between 1 March and 1 April 2018 in 1531 patients were included in this study. The over-scanned length values in the z-axis for each CT examination on each patient were determined by calculating the difference between the actual scanned length and optimal scan length in the z-axis. Over-scanning and over-scanning ratios were interrogated in terms of potential underlying factors that can be affected by patient demography, time, the throughput of CT, and the experience of technologists.

Results

Over-scanned CTs in z-axis were 66% of all CTs performed. CT scans were over-scanned in the cranial side in 18.4% and caudal side in 48.5% of patients. Over-scanning was found to be more frequent in 55–64-year-old age group (74%), thorax CTs (89.2%), patients with consciousness change (88.9%), patients with misleading findings related to lung apex or diaphragm on the scout images (76.6%), CTs performed in day shift (66.8 %), in CT with low daily scan (72.4%), and CT scans performed by less-experienced technologists (75.9%).

Conclusions

Over-scanning in z-axis in body CT examinations is not infrequently encountered in routine practice. Awareness of causes of over-scanning in z-axis can be helpful to prevent over-scanning in CT and unnecessary ionizing radiation exposure in patients.

Key Points

Over-scanning in z-axis frequently occurs in body CT.

The frequency of over-scanning in caudal side is higher than cranial side.

Chest CT and any CT performed in following situation were more prone to over-scanning: older patients, patients with consciousness change, presence of misleading findings on the scout images related to lung apex or diaphragm, day shift, CT with low daily scan, less-experienced technologist.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AEC:

Automatic exposure control

BMI:

Body mass index

CE:

Contrast-enhanced

CT:

Computed tomography

DLP:

Dose length product

PACS:

Picture archiving and communication systems

SPSS:

Statistical Package for Social Sciences

T10:

Tenth thoracic vertebra

References

  1. Brenner DJ, Hricak H (2010) Radiation exposure from medical imaging: time to regulate? JAMA 304:208–209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Schauer D, Linton O (2009) NCRP Report No. 160, ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States, medical exposure—are we doing less with more, and is there a role for health physicists? Health Phys 97:1–5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Raman SP, Johnson PT, Deshmukh S, Mahesh M, Grant KL, Fishman EK (2013) CT dose reduction applications: available tools on the latest generation of CT scanners. J Am Coll Radiol 10:37–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Campbell J, Kalra MK, Rizzo S, Maher MM, Shepard J-A (2005) Scanning beyond anatomic limits of the thorax in chest CT: findings, radiation dose, and automatic tube current modulation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185:1525–1530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Schwartz F, Stieltjes B, Szucs-Farkas Z, Euler A (2018) Over-scanning in chest CT: comparison of practice among six hospitals and its impact on radiation dose. Eur J Radiol 102:49–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zanca F, Demeter M, Oyen R, Bosmans H (2012) Excess radiation and organ dose in chest and abdominal CT due to CT acquisition beyond expected anatomical boundaries. Eur Radiol 22:779–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cohen SL, Ward TJ, Makhnevich A, Richardson S, Cham MD (2020) Retrospective analysis of 1118 outpatient chest CT scans to determine factors associated with excess scan length. Clin Imaging 62:76–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Liao EA, Quint LE, Goodsitt MM, Francis IR, Khalatbari S, Myles JD (2011) Extra Z-axis coverage at CT imaging resulting in excess radiation dose: frequency, degree and contributory factors. J Comput Assist Tomogr 35:50–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang M, Wellnitz C, Cui C, Pavlicek W, Wu T (2015) Automated detection of Z-axis coverage with abdomen-pelvis computed tomography examinations. J Digit Imaging 28:362–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, Kamath RS, Halpern EF, Saini S (2004) Radiation from “extra” images acquired with abdominal and/or pelvic CT: effect of automatic tube current modulation. Radiology 232:409–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lekgabe E, Tran N, Cheung W et al (2015) Single-pass CT chest/abdomen/pelvis for oncology patients: effect on radiation dose and image quality. ESR EPOS. https://doi.org/10.1594/ecr2015/C-1895

  12. Schilham A, van der Molen AJ, Prokop M, de Jong HW (2010) Overranging at multisection CT: an underestimated source of excess radiation exposure. Radiographics 30(4):1057–1067

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors state that this work has not received any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehmet Ruhi Onur.

Ethics declarations

Guarantor

The scientific guarantors of this publication are Mehmet Ruhi Onur, M.D., and Deniz Akata, M.D.

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Statistics and biometry

One of the authors (İlkay Sedakat Idilman) has significant statistical expertise.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was not required for this study because study being of retrospective

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained (Decision no: GO 18/557-23).

Study subjects or cohorts overlap

Some study subjects or cohorts have not been previously reported in an article before. This study was presented in ECR 2019 as an oral presentation (B – 1594) in scientific session (SS 1813).

Methodology

• Retrospective

• Cross sectional study

• Performed at one institution

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(DOCX 22 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yar, O., Onur, M.R., İdilman, İ.S. et al. Excessive z-axis scan coverage in body CT: frequency and causes. Eur Radiol 31, 4358–4366 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07510-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07510-4

Keywords

Navigation