Abstract
Objectives
The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of gadobenate dimeglumine–enhanced MRI and gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI in the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) in cirrhotic patients with different degrees of liver dysfunction.
Methods
In this retrospective cross-sectional study, we analyzed the unenhanced phase and the HBP of 131 gadobenate dimeglumine–enhanced MRI examinations (gadobenate dimeglumine group) and 127 gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI examinations (gadoxetic acid group) performed in 249 cirrhotic patients (181 men and 68 women; mean age, 64.8 years) from August 2011 to April 2017. For each MRI, the contrast enhancement index of the liver parenchyma was calculated and correlated to the Model For End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score (multiple linear regression analysis). A qualitative analysis of the adequacy of the HBP, adjusted for the MELD score (logistic regression analysis), was performed.
Results
The contrast enhancement index was inversely related (r = − 0.013) with MELD score in both gadoxetic acid and gadobenate dimeglumine group. At the same MELD score, the contrast enhancement index in the gadoxetic acid group was increased by a factor of 0.23 compared to the gadobenate dimeglumine group (p < 0.001), and the mean odds ratio to have an adequate HBP with gadoxetic acid compared to gadobenate dimeglumine was 3.64 (p < 0.001). The adequacy of the HBP in the gadoxetic acid group compared to the gadobenate dimeglumine group increased with the increase of the MELD score (exp(b)interaction = 1.233; p = 0.011).
Conclusion
In cirrhotic patients, the hepatobiliary phase obtained with gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI is of better quality in comparison to gadobenate dimeglumine–enhanced MRI, mainly in patients with high MELD score.
Key Points
• In cirrhotic patients, the adequacy of the hepatobiliary phase with gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI is better compared to gadobenate dimeglumine–enhanced MRI.
• Gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI should be preferred to gadobenate dimeglumine–enhanced MRI in cirrhotic patients with MELD score > 10, if the hepatobiliary phase is clinically indicated.
• In patients with high MELD score (> 15), the administration of the hepatobiliary agent could be useless; even though, if it is clinically indicated, we recommend to use gadoxetic acid given the higher probability of obtaining clinically relevant information.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- CEI:
-
Contrast enhancement index
- HBP:
-
Hepatobiliary phase
- MELD:
-
Model for end-stage liver disease
- MRI:
-
Magnetic resonance imaging
- SIR:
-
Signal intensity ratio
References
Dahlqvist Leinhard O, Dahlström N, Kihlberg J et al (2012) Quantifying differences in hepatic uptake of the liver specific contrast agents Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-BOPTA: a pilot study. Eur Radiol 22:642–653
Brismar TB, Dahlström N, Edsborg N, Persson A, Smedby O, Albiin N (2009) Liver vessel enhancement by Gd-BOPTA and Gd-EOB-DTPA: a comparison in healthy volunteers. Acta Radiol 50:709–715
Dahlström N, Persson A, Albiin N, Smedby O, Brismar TB (2007) Contrast-enhanced MR cholangiography with Gd-BOPTA and Gd-EOB-DTPA in healthy subjects. Acta Radiol 48:362–368
Ishak K, Baptista A, Bianchi L et al (1995) Histological grading and staging of chronic hepatitis. J Hepatol 22:696–699
Frydrychowicz A, Lubner MG, Brown JJ et al (2012) Hepatobiliary MR imaging with gadolinium based contrast agents. J Magn Reson Imaging 35:492–511
Golfieri R, Renzulli M, Lucidi V, Corcioni B, Trevisani F, Bolondi L (2011) Contribution of the hepatobiliary phase of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI to dynamic MRI in the detection of hypovascular small (≤ 2 cm) HCC in cirrhosis. Eur Radiol 21:1233–1242
Piscaglia F, Iavarone M, Galassi M et al (2015) Cholangiocarcinoma in cirrhosis: value of hepatocyte specific magnetic resonance imaging. Dig Dis 33:735–744
Verloh N, Haimerl M, Zeman F et al (2014) Assessing liver function by liver enhancement during the hepatobiliary phase with Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI at 3 tesla. Eur Radiol 24:1013–1019
Verloh N, Haimerl M, Rennert J et al (2013) Impact of liver cirrhosis on liver enhancement at Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI at 3 tesla. Eur J Radiol 82:1710–1715
Kamath PS, Wiesner RH, Malinchoc M et al (2001) A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease. Hepatology 33:464–470
Agnello F, Dioguardi Burgio M, Picone D et al (2016) Magnetic resonance imaging of the cirrhotic liver in the era of gadoxetic acid. World J Gastroenterol 22:103–111
Tamada T, Ito K, Higaki A et al (2011) Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MR imaging: evaluation of hepatic enhancement effects in normal and cirrhotic livers. Eur J Radiol 80:311–316
Tschirch FT, Struwe A, Petrowsky H, Kakales I, Marincek B, Weishaupt D (2008) Contrast-enhanced MR cholangiography with Gd-EOB-DTPA in patients with liver cirrhosis: visualization of the biliary ducts in comparison with patients with normal liver parenchyma. Eur Radiol 18:1577–1586
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROBE Initiative (2008) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE)statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol 61:344–349
Sporea I, Sirli R, Popescu A, Danilă M (2010) Acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI)--a new modality for the evaluation of liver fibrosis. Med Ultrason 12:26–31
Foucher J, Chanteloup E, Vergniol J et al (2006) Diagnosis of cirrhosis by transient elastography (FibroScan): a prospective study. Gut 55:403–408
Ba-Ssalamah A, Bastati N, Wibmer A et al (2017) Hepatic gadoxetic acid uptake as a measure of diffuse liver disease: where are we? J Magn Reson Imaging 45:646–659
Tamada T, Ito K, Yamamoto A et al (2013) Simple method for evaluating the degree of liver parenchymal enhancement in the hepatobiliary phase of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 37:1115–1121
Filippone A, Blakeborough A, Breuer J et al (2010) Enhancement of liver parenchyma after injection of hepatocyte-specific MRI contrast media: a comparison of gadoxetic acid and gadobenate dimeglumine. J Magn Reson Imaging 31:356–364
Bashir MR, Breault SR, Braun R, Do RK, Nelson RC, Reeder SB (2014) Optimal timing and diagnostic adequacy of hepatocyte phase imaging with gadoxetate-enhanced liver MRI. Acad Radiol 21:726–732
Talakic E, Steiner J, Kalmar P et al (2014) Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI of the liver: correlation of relative hepatic enhancement, relative renal enhancement, and liver to kidneys enhancement ratio with serum hepatic enzyme levels and eGFR. Eur J Radiol 83:607–611
Yoneyama T, Fukukura Y, Kamimura K et al (2014) Efficacy of liver parenchymal enhancement and liver volume to standard liver volume ratio on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI for estimation of liver function. Eur Radiol 24:857–865
Zhao X, Huang M, Zhu Q, Wang T, Liu Q (2015) The relationship between liver function and liver parenchymal contrast enhancement on Gd-BOPTA-enhanced MR imaging in the hepatocyte phase. Magn Reson Imaging 33:768–773
Kobi M, Paroder V, Flusberg M, Rozenblit AM, Chernyak V (2017) Limitations of GD-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI: can clinical parameters predict suboptimal hepatobiliary phase? Clin Radiol 72:55–62
CT/MRI LI-RADS® v2018 CORE. https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/RADS/LI-RADS/LI-RADS-2018-Core.pdf?la=en. Accessed 27 Sep 2018
Acknowledgements
This work has been presented as an oral presentation titled “Comparison of two liver specific contrast agents in patients with different degrees of liver cirrhosis” at the European Congress of Radiology that was held in Vienna in March 2018.
Funding
The authors state that this work has not received any funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Guarantor
The scientific guarantor of this publication is Angelo Vanzulli.
Conflict of interest
The authors of this manuscript declare relationships with the following companies:
Giuseppe Brancatelli: Speaker for Bayer and Guerbet; Guerbet advisory Board.
Angelo Vanzulli: Invited lecture with fee at the European Congress of Radiology 2017, funded by Bracco Spa.
The remaining authors declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.
Statistics and biometry
One of the authors has significant statistical expertise: Piergiorgio Duca.
Informed consent
Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board.
Ethical approval
Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.
Methodology
• retrospective
• cross-sectional study
• multicenter study
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Khouri Chalouhi, C., Vernuccio, F., Rini, F. et al. Hepatobiliary phase in cirrhotic patients with different Model for End-stage Liver Disease score: comparison of the performance of gadoxetic acid to gadobenate dimeglumine. Eur Radiol 29, 3090–3099 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5884-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5884-2