Abstract
Objectives
To identify imaging algorithms and indications, CT protocols, and radiation doses in polytrauma patients in Swiss trauma centres.
Methods
An online survey with multiple choice questions and free-text responses was sent to authorized level-I trauma centres in Switzerland.
Results
All centres responded and indicated that they have internal standardized imaging algorithms for polytrauma patients. Nine of 12 centres (75 %) perform whole-body CT (WBCT) after focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) and conventional radiography; 3/12 (25 %) use WBCT for initial imaging. Indications for WBCT were similar across centres being based on trauma mechanisms, vital signs, and presence of multiple injuries. Seven of 12 centres (58 %) perform an arterial and venous phase of the abdomen in split-bolus technique. Six of 12 centres (50 %) use multiphase protocols of the head (n = 3) and abdomen (n = 4), whereas 6/12 (50 %) use single-phase protocols for WBCT. Arm position was on the patient`s body during scanning (3/12, 25 %), alongside the body (2/12, 17 %), above the head (2/12, 17 %), or was changed during scanning (5/12, 42 %). Radiation doses showed large variations across centres ranging from 1268-3988 mGy*cm (DLP) per WBCT.
Conclusions
Imaging algorithms in polytrauma patients are standardized within, but vary across Swiss trauma centres, similar to the individual WBCT protocols, resulting in large variations in associated radiation doses.
Key Points
• Swiss trauma centres have internal standardized imaging algorithms for trauma patients
• Whole-body CT is most commonly used for imaging of trauma patients
• CT protocols and radiation doses vary greatly across Swiss trauma centres
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- WBCT:
-
Whole-body computed tomography
- FAST:
-
Focused assessment with sonography for trauma
- DLP:
-
Dose-length product
References
Bernhard M, Becker TK, Nowe T et al (2007) Introduction of a treatment algorithm can improve the early management of emergency patients in the resuscitation room. Resuscitation 73:362–373
Wintermark M, Poletti P-A, Becker CD, Schnyder P (2002) Traumatic injuries: organization and ergonomics of imaging in the emergency environment. Eur Radiol 12:959–968
Huber-Wagner S, Lefering R, Qvick L-M et al (2009) Effect of whole-body CT during trauma resuscitation on survival: a retrospective, multicentre study. Lancet 373:1455–1461
Poletti P-A, Wintermark M, Schnyder P, Becker CD (2002) Traumatic injuries: role of imaging in the management of the polytrauma victim (conservative expectation). Eur Radiol 12:969–978
Linsenmaier U, Krotz M, Hauser H et al (2002) Whole-body computed tomography in polytrauma: techniques and management. Eur Radiol 12:1728–1740
Wurmb TE, Frühwald P, Hopfner W, Roewer N, Brederlau J (2007) Whole-body multislice computed tomography as the primary and sole diagnostic tool in patients with blunt trauma: searching for its appropriate indication. Am J Emerg Med 25:1057–1062
Surendran A, Mori A, Varma DK, Gruen RL (2014) Systematic review of the benefits and harms of whole-body computed tomography in the early management of multitrauma patients: are we getting the whole picture? J Trauma Acute Care Surg 76:1122–1130
Gordic S, Alkadhi H, Hodel S et al (2015) Whole-body CT-based imaging algorithm for multiple trauma patients: radiation dose and time to diagnosis. Br J Radiol 88:20140616
Smith CM, Mason S (2012) The use of whole-body CT for trauma patients: survey of UK emergency departments. Emerg Med J 29:630–634
Wiklund E, Koskinen SK, Linder F, Aslund PE, Eklof H (2016) Whole body computed tomography for trauma patients in the Nordic countries 2014: survey shows significant differences and a need for common guidelines. Acta Radiol 57:750–757
Heller MT, Kanal E, Almusa O et al (2014) Utility of additional CT examinations driven by completion of a standard trauma imaging protocol in patients transferred for minor trauma. Emerg Radiol 21:341–347
Tscherne H, Oestern HJ, Sturm JA (1984) Stress tolerance of patients with multiple injuries and its significance for operative care. Langenbecks Arch Chir 364:71–77
Larson DB, Johnson LW, Schnell BM, Salisbury SR, Forman HP (2011) National trends in CT use in the emergency department: 1995-2007. Radiology 258:164–173
Ptak T, Rhea J, Novelline R (2001) Experience with a continuous, single-pass whole-body multidetector CT protocol for trauma: the three-minute multiple trauma CT scan. Emerg Radiol 8:250–256
Fanucci E, Fiaschetti V, Rotili A, Floris R, Simonetti G (2007) Whole body 16-row multislice CT in emergency room: effects of different protocols on scanning time, image quality and radiation exposure. Emerg Radiol 13:251–257
Ianniello S, Di Giacomo V, Sessa B, Miele V (2014) First-line sonographic diagnosis of pneumothorax in major trauma: accuracy of e-FAST and comparison with multidetector computed tomography. La Radiologia Medica 119:674–680
Boscak AR, Shanmuganathan K, Mirvis SE et al (2013) Optimizing trauma multidetector CT protocol for blunt splenic injury: need for arterial and portal venous phase scans. Radiology 268:79–88
Uyeda JW, LeBedis CA, Penn DR, Soto JA, Anderson SW (2014) Active hemorrhage and vascular injuries in splenic trauma: utility of the arterial phase in multidetector CT. Radiology 270:99–106
Stedman JM, Franklin JM, Nicholl H, Anderson EM, Moore NR (2014) Splenic parenchymal heterogeneity at dual-bolus single-acquisition CT in polytrauma patients-6-months experience from Oxford, UK. Emerg Radiol 21:257–260
Brink M, de Lange F, Oostveen LJ et al (2008) Arm raising at exposure-controlled multidetector trauma CT of thoracoabdominal region: higher image quality, lower radiation dose. Radiology 249:661–670
Bayer J, Pache G, Strohm PC et al (2011) Influence of arm positioning on radiation dose for whole body computed tomography in trauma patients. J Trauma 70:900–905
Leidner B, Adiels M, Aspelin P, Gullstrand P, Wallen S (1998) Standardized CT examination of the multitraumatized patient. Eur Radiol 8:1630–1638
Nguyen D, Platon A, Shanmuganathan K, Mirvis SE, Becker CD, Poletti PA (2009) Evaluation of a single-pass continuous whole-body 16-MDCT protocol for patients with polytrauma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:3–10
Karlo C, Gnannt R, Frauenfelder T et al (2011) Whole-body CT in polytrauma patients: effect of arm positioning on thoracic and abdominal image quality. Emerg Radiol 18:285–293
Castillo M (2006) Neuroradiology companion: methods, guidelines, and imaging fundamentals, 3rd edn., Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Philadelphia
Saltzherr T, Bakker F, Beenen L, Dijkgraaf M, Reitsma J, Goslings JC (2012) Randomized clinical trial comparing the effect of computed tomography in the trauma room versus the radiology department on injury outcomes. Br J Surg 99:105–113
Acknowledgements
The scientific guarantor of this publication is Hatem Alkadhi. The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article. The authors state that this work has not received any funding. No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper. Institutional review board approval was obtained. Informed consent was not required because the study represents a national survey, and no patient data were handled for this manuscript. None of the subjects have been previously reported.
Methodology: retrospective, observational, multicenter study.
We would like to thank Dr. Christopher M Smith, author of a survey in the UK, and Dr. Hampus Eklöf, author of a survey in Nordic countries, for providing us their questionnaires. We thank also Dr. Alexandra Platon, Geneva, and Dr. Daniel Ott, Bern, for supporting our project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
P.-A. Poletti and H. Alkadhi on behalf of the Swiss Society of Emergency Radiology.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hinzpeter, R., Boehm, T., Boll, D. et al. Imaging algorithms and CT protocols in trauma patients: survey of Swiss emergency centers. Eur Radiol 27, 1922–1928 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4574-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4574-1