Abstract
Objectives
To measure benign and malignant prostate tissue stiffness using shear-wave elastography (SWE).
Methods
Thirty consecutive patients underwent transrectal SWE in the axial and sagittal planes before prostatectomy. After reviewing prostatectomy specimens, two radiologists measured stiffness in regions corresponding to cancers, lateral and median benign peripheral zone (PZ) and benign transition zone (TZ).
Results
Cancers were stiffer than benign PZ and TZ. All tissue classes were stiffer on sagittal than on axial imaging, in TZ than in PZ, and in median PZ than in lateral PZ. At multivariate analysis, the nature of tissue (benign or malignant; P < 0.00001), the imaging plane (axial or sagittal; P < 0.00001) and the location within the prostate (TZ, median PZ or lateral PZ; P = 0.0065) significantly and independently influenced tissue stiffness. On axial images, the thresholds maximising the Youden index in TZ, lateral PZ and median PZ were respectively 62 kPa, 33 kPa and 49 kPa. On sagittal images, the thresholds were 76 kPa, 50 kPa and 72 kPa, respectively.
Conclusions
SWE can distinguish prostate malignant and benign tissues. Tissue stiffness is influenced by the imaging plane and the location within the gland.
Key Points
• Prostate cancers were stiffer than the benign peripheral zone
• All tissue classes were stiffer on sagittal than on axial imaging
• All tissue classes were stiffer in the transition zone than in the peripheral zone
• All tissue classes were stiffer in the median than in the lateral peripheral zone
• Taking into account imaging plane and zonal anatomy can improve cancer detection
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- SWE:
-
Shear-wave elastography
- PZ:
-
Peripheral zone
- TZ:
-
Transition zone
- BPH:
-
Benign prostate hyperplasia
References
Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Briers E, et al. (2016) EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Available at: https://uroweb.org/individual-guidelines/oncology-guidelines
Rubin R (2015) Researchers look to MRI and biomarkers to help improve detection of aggressive prostate cancers. JAMA 313:654–656
Bratan F, Niaf E, Melodelima C et al (2013) Influence of imaging and histological factors on prostate cancer detection and localisation on multiparametric MRI: a prospective study. Eur Radiol 23:2019–2029
Valerio M, Donaldson I, Emberton M et al (2015) Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy: a systematic review. Eur Urol 68:8–19
Schoots IG, Roobol MJ, Nieboer D, Bangma CH, Steyerberg EW, Hunink MG (2015) Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of significant prostate cancer detection compared to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 68:438–450
Turkbey B, Mani H, Shah V et al (2011) Multiparametric 3T prostate magnetic resonance imaging to detect cancer: histopathological correlation using prostatectomy specimens processed in customized magnetic resonance imaging based molds. J Urol 186:1818–1824
van Hove A, Savoie PH, Maurin C et al (2014) Comparison of image-guided targeted biopsies versus systematic randomized biopsies in the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic literature review of well-designed studies. World J Urol 32:847–858
Postema A, Mischi M, de la Rosette J, Wijkstra H (2015) Multiparametric ultrasound in the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic review. World J Urol 33:1651–1659
Bercoff J, Tanter M, Fink M (2004) Supersonic shear imaging: a new technique for soft tissue elasticity mapping. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 51:396–409
Shiina T, Nightingale KR, Palmeri ML et al (2015) WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography: Part 1: basic principles and terminology. Ultrasound Med Biol 41:1126–1147
Franchi-Abella S, Elie C, Correas JM (2013) Ultrasound elastography: advantages, limitations and artefacts of the different techniques from a study on a phantom. Diagn Interv Imaging 94:497–501
Zheng XZ, Ji P, Mao HW et al (2011) A novel approach to assessing changes in prostate stiffness with age using virtual touch tissue quantification. J Ultrasound Med 30:387–390
Barr RG, Memo R, Schaub CR (2012) Shear wave ultrasound elastography of the prostate: initial results. Ultrasound Q 28:13–20
Ahmad S, Cao R, Varghese T, Bidaut L, Nabi G (2013) Transrectal quantitative shear wave elastography in the detection and characterisation of prostate cancer. Surg Endosc 27:3280–3287
Woo S, Kim SY, Cho JY, Kim SH (2014) Shear wave elastography for detection of prostate cancer: a preliminary study. Korean J Radiol 15:346–355
Correas JM, Tissier AM, Khairoune A et al (2015) Prostate cancer: diagnostic performance of real-time shear-wave elastography. Radiology 275:280–289
Woo S, Kim SY, Lee MS, Cho JY, Kim SH (2015) Shear wave elastography assessment in the prostate: an intraobserver reproducibility study. Clin Imaging 39:484–487
Samaratunga H, Montironi R, True L et al (2011) International society of urological pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens. Working group 1: specimen handling. Mod Pathol 24:6–15
Boehm K, Budaus L, Tennstedt P et al (2015) Prediction of significant prostate cancer at prostate biopsy and per core detection rate of targeted and systematic biopsies using real-time shear wave elastography. Urol Int 95:189–196
Boehm K, Salomon G, Beyer B et al (2015) Shear wave elastography for localization of prostate cancer lesions and assessment of elasticity thresholds: implications for targeted biopsies and active surveillance protocols. J Urol 193:794–800
Varghese T, Ophir J, Krouskop TA (2000) Nonlinear stress-strain relationships in tissue and their effect on the contrast-to-noise ratio in elastograms. Ultrasound Med Biol 26:839–851
Barr RG, Zhang Z (2012) Effects of precompression on elasticity imaging of the breast: development of a clinically useful semiquantitative method of precompression assessment. J Ultrasound Med 31:895–902
Kruse SA, Smith JA, Lawrence AJ et al (2000) Tissue characterization using magnetic resonance elastography: preliminary results. Phys Med Biol 45:1579–1590
Gennisson JL, Deffieux T, Mace E, Montaldo G, Fink M, Tanter M (2010) Viscoelastic and anisotropic mechanical properties of in vivo muscle tissue assessed by supersonic shear imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol 36:789–801
Gibbs P, Tozer DJ, Liney GP, Turnbull LW (2001) Comparison of quantitative T2 mapping and diffusion-weighted imaging in the normal and pathologic prostate. Magn Reson Med 46:1054–1058
Gibbs P, Pickles MD, Turnbull LW (2006) Diffusion imaging of the prostate at 3.0 tesla. Investig Radiol 41:185–188
Park SY, Kim CK, Park BK, Ha SY, Kwon GY, Kim B (2014) Diffusion-tensor MRI at 3 T: differentiation of central gland prostate cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia. AJR Am J Roentgenol 202:W254–W262
Sinha S, Sinha U (2004) In vivo diffusion tensor imaging of the human prostate. Magn Reson Med 52:530–537
Chesnais AL, Niaf E, Bratan F et al (2013) Differentiation of transitional zone prostate cancer from benign hyperplasia nodules: evaluation of discriminant criteria at multiparametric MRI. Clin Radiol 68:e323–e330
Hoeks CM, Hambrock T, Yakar D et al (2013) Transition zone prostate cancer: detection and localization with 3-T multiparametric MR imaging. Radiology 266:207–217
Acknowledgments
The scientific guarantor of this publication is Olivier Rouvière. The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article. This study has received funding by a grant from the French National Cancer Institute (Institut National du Cancer; Cartographix project—PAIR Prostate funding programme). One of the authors has significant statistical expertise. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects (patients) in this study. No study subjects or cohorts have been previously reported. Methodology: prospective, diagnostic or prognostic study, performed at one institution.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rouvière, O., Melodelima, C., Hoang Dinh, A. et al. Stiffness of benign and malignant prostate tissue measured by shear-wave elastography: a preliminary study. Eur Radiol 27, 1858–1866 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4534-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4534-9