Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Differentiation of early gastric cancer with ulceration and resectable advanced gastric cancer using multiphasic dynamic multidetector CT

  • Gastrointestinal
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Early gastric cancer with ulceration (EGC-U) mimics advanced gastric cancer (AGC), as EGC-Us and ACGs often have similar endoscopic appearance to ulceration. The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine whether multiphasic dynamic multidetector CT (MDCT) can help differentiate EGC-Us from AGCs.

Methods

Patients with EGC-Us with ulcer stages Ul-III or IV and AGCs with tumour stages T2 to T4a were enrolled. MDCT images were obtained 40 s (arterial phase), 70 s (portal phase) and 240 s (delayed phase) after injection of non-ionic contrast material. Two readers independently measured the attenuation values of the lesions by placing regions of interest. We compared the EGC-Us and AGCs using the mean attenuation values in each phase and peak enhancement phase. We analysed the diagnostic performance of CT for differentiating EGC-Us from AGCs.

Results

Forty cases (16 EGC-Us and 24 AGCs) were analysed. The mean attenuation values of the EGC-Us were significantly lower than those of the AGCs in both the arterial and portal phases (all p < 0.0001 for each reader). The peak enhancement was significantly different between the EGC-Us and AGCs for both readers (Reader 1, p = 0.0131; Reader 2, p = 0.0006).

Conclusion

Multiphasic dynamic contrast-enhanced MDCT can help differentiate EGC-Us from AGCs.

Key Points

Early gastric cancer with ulceration and advanced gastric cancer have similar endoscopic appearances.

EGC-U shows significantly lower attenuation values in both arterial and portal phases.

Multiphasic dynamic contrast-enhanced MDCT differentiates EGC-U from AGC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

3D:

Three-dimensional

AGC:

Advanced gastric cancer

EGC-U:

Early gastric cancer with ulceration

EUS:

Endoscopic ultrasound

FOV:

Field of view

MDCT:

Multidetector computed tomography

NPV:

Negative predictive value

PPV:

Positive predictive value

ROC:

Receiver operator characteristics

ROI:

Region of interest

References

  1. Chen CY, Wu DC, Kuo YT, Lee CH, Jaw TS, Kang WY et al (2008) MDCT for differentiation of category T1 and T2 malignant lesions from benign gastric ulcers. Am J Roentgenol 190:1505–1511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Haukland HH, Johnson JA, Eide JT (1981) Carcinoma diagnosed in excised gastric ulcers. Acta Chir Scand 147:439–443

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shimizu S, Tada M, Kawai K (1995) Early gastric cancer: its surveillance and natural course. Endoscopy 27:27–31

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kitamura K, Yamaguchi T, Nishida S, Yamamoto K, Okamoto K, Taniguchi H et al (1997) Early gastric cancer mimicking advanced gastric cancer. Br J Cancer 75:1769–1773

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim JP, Lee JH, Kim SJ, Yu HJ, Yang HK (1998) Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic factors in 10 783 patients with gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 1:125–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim GH, Park do Y, Kida M, Kim DH, Jeon TY, Kang HJ et al (2010) Accuracy of high-frequency catheter-based endoscopic ultrasonography according to the indications for endoscopic treatment of early gastric cancer. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 25:506–511

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Choi J, Kim SG, Im JP, Kim JS, Jung HC, Song IS (2010) Is endoscopic ultrasonography indispensable in patients with early gastric cancer prior to endoscopic resection? Surg Endosc 24:3177–3185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim JH, Eun HW, Choi JH, Hong SS, Kang W, Auh YH (2007) Diagnostic performance of virtual gastroscopy using MDCT in early gastric cancer compared with 2D axial CT: focusing on interobserver variation. Am J Roentgenol 189:299–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Furukawa K, Miyahara R, Itoh A, Ohmiya N, Hirooka Y, Mori K et al (2011) Diagnosis of the invasion depth of gastric cancer using MDCT with virtual gastroscopy: comparison with staging with endoscopic ultrasound. Am J Roentgenol 197:867–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Habermann CR, Weiss F, Riecken R, Honarpisheh H, Bohnacker S, Staedtler C et al (2004) Preoperative staging of gastric adenocarcinoma: comparison of helical CT and endoscopic US. Radiology 230:465–471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hwang SW, Lee DH, Lee SH, Park YS, Hwang JH, Kim JW et al (2010) Preoperative staging of gastric cancer by endoscopic ultrasonography and multidetector-row computed tomography. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 25:512–518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Japanese Gastric Cancer A (2011) Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer 14:101–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Niwa Y, Nakazawa S, Tsukamoto Y, Goto H, Hase S, Ohashi S et al (1991) A new method for evaluating gastric ulcer healing by endoscopic ultrasonography. Scand J Gastroenterol 26:457–464

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ulla M, Cavadas D, Munoz I, Beskow A, Seehaus A, Garcia-Monaco R (2010) Esophageal cancer: pneumo-64-MDCT. Abdom Imaging 35:383–389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim HJ, Kim AY, Oh ST, Kim JS, Kim KW, Kim PN et al (2005) Gastric cancer staging at multi-detector row CT gastrography: comparison of transverse and volumetric CT scanning. Radiology 236:879–885

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Efsen F, Fischerman K (1974) Angiography in gastric tumours. Acta Radiol Diagn 15:193–197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Shibata S, Iwasaki N (1970) Angiographic findings in diseases of the stomach. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 110:322–331

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Minami M, Kawauchi N, Itai Y, Niki T, Sasaki Y (1992) Gastric tumors: radiologic-pathologic correlation and accuracy of T staging with dynamic CT. Radiology 185:173–178

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cho JS, Kim JK, Rho SM, Lee HY, Jeong HY, Lee CS (1994) Preoperative assessment of gastric carcinoma: value of two-phase dynamic CT with mechanical iv. injection of contrast material. Am J Roentgenol 163:69–75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim HS, Han HY, Choi JA, Park CM, Cha IH, Chung KB et al (2001) Preoperative evaluation of gastric cancer: value of spiral CT during gastric arteriography (CTGA). Abdom Imaging 26:123–130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Takao M, Fukuda T, Iwanaga S, Hayashi K, Kusano H, Okudaira S (1998) Gastric cancer: evaluation of triphasic spiral CT and radiologic-pathologic correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 22:288–294

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kwee RM, Kwee TC (2008) The accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography in differentiating mucosal from deeper gastric cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 03:1801–1809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Puli SR, Batapati Krishna Reddy J, Bechtold ML, Antillon MR, Ibdah JA (2008) How good is endoscopic ultrasound for TNM staging of gastric cancers? A meta-analysis and systematic review. World J Gastroenterol 14:4011–4019

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Akashi K, Yanai H, Nishikawa J, Satake M, Fukagawa Y, Okamoto T et al (2006) Ulcerous change decreases the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography diagnosis for the invasive depth of early gastric cancer. Int J Gastrointest Cancer 37:133–138

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kitano S, Shiraishi N (2004) Current status of laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer in Japan. Surg Endosc 18:182–185

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gotoda T, Yamamoto H, Soetikno RM (2006) Endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer. J Gastroenterol 41:929–942

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper was presented at ECR 2014, entitled “Differentiation of Early Gastric Cancer with Ulceration and Advanced Gastric Cancer Using Multiphasic Dynamic Multidetector CT” (Scientific Session, B-0637).The scientific guarantor of this publication is Hiroshi Honda. The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article. The authors state that this work has not received any funding. No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained. Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board. Study subjects or cohorts have not been previously reported. Methodology: retrospective, diagnostic or prognostic study, performed at one institution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daisuke Tsurumaru.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsurumaru, D., Miyasaka, M., Nishimuta, Y. et al. Differentiation of early gastric cancer with ulceration and resectable advanced gastric cancer using multiphasic dynamic multidetector CT. Eur Radiol 26, 1330–1337 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3938-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3938-2

Keywords

Navigation