Abstract
Objective
To evaluate the accuracy of two different sonographic median nerve measurement calculations in predicting carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) severity in a study population with clinically and electrophysiologically confirmed CTS.
Methods
643 wrists of 427 patients (325 females and 102 males, age range: 17–90 years, mean ± SD: 57.9 ± 14.7) were included with CTS diagnosis based on clinical and nerve conduction studies (NCS). Cross-sectional area (CSA) measurement of the median nerve was performed at the carpal tunnel level (CSAc) and at the pronator quadratus muscle level (CSAp). Two parameters were calculated: delta (∆-CSA), which is the difference between proximal and distal measurements, and ratio (R-CSA), calculated by dividing distal over proximal measurements.
Results
Patients were classified into mild, moderate and severe CTS based upon NCS. The mean ∆-CSA (4.2 ± 2.6, 6.95 ± 2.2 and 10.7 ± 4.9 mm2) and mean R-CSA (1.5 ± 0.4, 1.95 ± 0.4 and 2.4 ± 0.7) values were significantly different between all groups (p < 0.001). Optimal cut-off values for ∆-CSA and R-CSA were 6 mm2 and 1.7, respectively, to distinguish mild from moderate disease, and 9 mm2 and 2.2, respectively, to distinguish moderate from severe disease.
Conclusion
Threshold values for the calculated sonographic parameters ∆-CSA and R-CSA are useful in predicting CTS severity compared to NCS.
Key Points
• Two proposed parameters were calculated (∆-CSA, R-CSA) and compared to NCS.
• A defined sonoanatomical proximal landmark was used for the calculation.
• Both parameters showed ability to detect CTS severity comparable to NCS.
• Cut-off values could be determined for both parameters.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- CTS:
-
Carpal tunnel syndrome
- NCS:
-
Nerve conduction studies
- CSA:
-
Cross-sectional area
- CSAc:
-
Cross-sectional area at the carpal tunnel
- CSAp:
-
Cross-sectional area proximally
- ∆-CSA:
-
Delta cross-sectional area
- R-CSA:
-
Ratio
References
Kim HS, Joo SH, Cho HK, Kim YW (2013) Comparison of proximal and distal cross-sectional areas of the median nerve, carpal tunnel, and nerve/tunnel index in subjects with carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 94(11):2151–2156
Hobson-Webb LD, Massey JM, Juel VC, Sanders DB (2008) The ultrasonographic wrist-to-forearm median nerve area ratio in carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Neurophysiol 119(6):1353–1357
Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Johnsson R, Ornstein E, Ranstam J, Rosen I (1999) Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome in a general population. JAMA 282(2):153–158
Lawrence RC, Felson DT, Helmick CG et al (2008) Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States. Part II. Arthritis Rheum 58(1):26–35
Descatha A, Dale AM, Franzblau A, Coomes J, Evanoff B (2010) Diagnostic strategies using physical examination are minimally useful in defining carpal tunnel syndrome in population-based research studies. Occup Environ Med 67(2):133–135
Klauser AS, Tagliafico A, Allen GM et al (2012) Clinical indications for musculoskeletal ultrasound: a Delphi-based consensus paper of the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology. Eur Radiol 22(5):1140–1148
Visser LH, Smidt MH, Lee ML (2008) High-resolution sonography versus EMG in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 79(1):63–67
Altinok T, Baysal O, Karakas HM et al (2004) Ultrasonographic assessment of mild and moderate idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Radiol 59(10):916–925
Kang S, Kwon HK, Kim KH, Yun HS (2012) Ultrasonography of median nerve and electrophysiologic severity in carpal tunnel syndrome. Ann Rehabil Med 36(1):72–79
Mhoon JT, Juel VC, Hobson-Webb LD (2012) Median nerve ultrasound as a screening tool in carpal tunnel syndrome: correlation of cross-sectional area measures with electrodiagnostic abnormality. Muscle Nerve 46(6):871–878
Sernik RA, Abicalaf CA, Pimentel BF, Braga-Baiak A, Braga L, Cerri GG (2008) Ultrasound features of carpal tunnel syndrome: a prospective case-control study. Skelet Radiol 37(1):49–53
Wiesler ER, Chloros GD, Cartwright MS, Smith BP, Rushing J, Walker FO (2006) The use of diagnostic ultrasound in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg [Am] 31(5):726–732
Koyuncuoglu HR, Kutluhan S, Yesildag A, Oyar O, Guler K, Ozden A (2005) The value of ultrasonographic measurement in carpal tunnel syndrome in patients with negative electrodiagnostic tests. Eur J Radiol 56(3):365–369
Wong SM, Griffith JF, Hui AC, Lo SK, Fu M, Wong KS (2004) Carpal tunnel syndrome: diagnostic usefulness of sonography. Radiology 232(1):93–99
Ziswiler HR, Reichenbach S, Vogelin E, Bachmann LM, Villiger PM, Juni P (2005) Diagnostic value of sonography in patients with suspected carpal tunnel syndrome: a prospective study. Arthritis Rheum 52(1):304–311
Yesildag A, Kutluhan S, Sengul N et al (2004) The role of ultrasonographic measurements of the median nerve in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Radiol 59(10):910–915
Klauser AS, Halpern EJ, De ZT et al (2009) Carpal tunnel syndrome assessment with US: value of additional cross-sectional area measurements of the median nerve in patients versus healthy volunteers. Radiology 250(1):171–177
Klauser AS, Halpern EJ, Faschingbauer R et al (2011) Bifid median nerve in carpal tunnel syndrome: assessment with US cross-sectional area measurement. Radiology 259(3):808–815
Miyamoto H, Halpern EJ, Kastlunger M (2014) Carpal tunnel syndrome: diagnosis by means of median nerve elasticity: improved diagnostic accuracy of US with sonoelastography. Radiology 270(2):481–486
Padua L, LoMonaco M, Gregori B, Valente EM, Padua R, Tonali P (1997) Neurophysiological classification and sensitivity in 500 carpal tunnel syndrome hands. Acta Neurol Scand 96(4):211–217
Sarria L, Cabada T, Cozcolluela R, Martinez-Berganza T, Garcia S (2000) Carpal tunnel syndrome: usefulness of sonography. Eur Radiol 10(12):1920–1925
Wong SM, Griffith JF, Hui AC, Tang A, Wong KS (2002) Discriminatory sonographic criteria for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Arthritis Rheum 46(7):1914–1921
Buchberger W, Judmaier W, Birbamer G, Lener M, Schmidauer C (1992) Carpal tunnel syndrome: diagnosis with high-resolution sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 159(4):793–798
Mohammadi A, Afshar A, Etemadi A, Masoudi S, Baghizadeh A (2010) Diagnostic value of cross-sectional area of median nerve in grading severity of carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Iran Med 13(6):516–521
Karadag YS, Karadag O, Cicekli E et al (2010) Severity of Carpal tunnel syndrome assessed with high frequency ultrasonography. Rheumatol Int 30(6):761–765
Moran L, Perez M, Esteban A, Bellon J, Arranz B, del Cerro M (2009) Sonographic measurement of cross-sectional area of the median nerve in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: correlation with nerve conduction studies. J Clin Ultrasound 37(3):125–131
Ajeena IM, Al-Saad RH, Al-Mudhafar A, Hadi NR, Al-Aridhy SH (2013) Ultrasonic assessment of females with carpal tunnel syndrome proved by nerve conduction study. s 2013:754–764
Acknowledgments
The scientific guarantor of this publication is Andrea S. Klauser. The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article. The authors state that this work has not received any funding. One of the authors has significant statistical expertise: Dr. Ethan J. Halpern, Department of Radiology and Urology, Jefferson Prostate Diagnostic Center and Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects (patients) in this study. Methodology: prospective, diagnostic or prognostic study, performed at one institution.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Klauser, A.S., Abd Ellah, M.M.H., Halpern, E.J. et al. Sonographic cross-sectional area measurement in carpal tunnel syndrome patients: can delta and ratio calculations predict severity compared to nerve conduction studies?. Eur Radiol 25, 2419–2427 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3649-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3649-8