Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of portal hypertension and high-risk oesophageal varices with liver and spleen three-dimensional multifrequency MR elastography in liver cirrhosis

  • Hepatobiliary-Pancreas
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To assess the value of the liver and spleen viscoelastic parameters at multifrequency MR elastography to determine the degree of portal hypertension and presence of high-risk oesophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis.

Methods

From January to September 2012, 36 consecutive patients with cirrhosis evaluated for transplantation were prospectively included. All patients underwent hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurements and endoscopy to assess oesophageal varices. Multifrequency MR elastography was performed within the liver and spleen. The shear, storage and loss moduli were calculated and compared to the HVPG with Spearman coefficients and multiple regressions. Patients with and without severe portal hypertension and high-risk varices were compared with Mann–Whitney tests, logistic regression and ROC analysis.

Results

The liver storage and loss moduli and the spleen shear, storage and loss moduli correlated with the HVPG. At multiple regression, only the liver and the spleen loss modulus correlated with the HVPG (r = 0.44, p = 0.017, and r = 0.57, p = 0.002, respectively). The spleen loss modulus was the best parameter for identifying patients with severe portal hypertension (p = 0.019, AUROC = 0.81) or high-risk varices (p = 0.042, AUROC = 0.93).

Conclusions

The spleen loss modulus appears to be the best parameter for identifying patients with severe portal hypertension or high-risk varices.

Key points

1. Noninvasive HVPG assessment can be performed with liver and spleen MR elastography

2. The spleen loss modulus enables the detection of high-risk oesophageal varices

3. The spleen loss modulus enables the detection of severe portal hypertension

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

MR:

magnetic resonance

HVPG:

hepatic venous pressure gradient

G*:

complex shear modulus

Gd:

storage modulus

Gl:

loss modulus

ROC:

receiver-operating characteristics

INR:

international normalised ratio

GGT:

gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase

AP:

alkaline phosphatase

AST:

aspartate aminotransferase

ALT:

alanine aminotransferase

AUROC:

area under the ROC curve

References

  1. Bosch J, Abraldes JG, Berzigotti A, Garcia-Pagan JC (2009) The clinical use of HVPG measurements in chronic liver disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 6:573–582

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ripoll C, Groszmann R, Garcia-Tsao G et al (2007) Hepatic venous pressure gradient predicts clinical decompensation in patients with compensated cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 133:481–488

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. de Franchis R, Baveno VF (2010) Revising consensus in portal hypertension: report of the Baveno V consensus workshop on methodology of diagnosis and therapy in portal hypertension. J Hepatol 53:762–768

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Groszmann RJ, Wongcharatrawee S (2004) The hepatic venous pressure gradient: anything worth doing should be done right. Hepatology 39:280–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Thomopoulos KC, Labropoulou-Karatza C, Mimidis KP, Katsakoulis EC, Iconomou G, Nikolopoulou VN (2003) Non-invasive predictors of the presence of large oesophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis. Dig Liver Dis 35:473–478

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schepis F, Camma C, Niceforo D et al (2001) Which patients with cirrhosis should undergo endoscopic screening for esophageal varices detection? Hepatology 33:333–338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pilette C, Oberti F, Aube C et al (1999) Non-invasive diagnosis of esophageal varices in chronic liver diseases. J Hepatol 31:867–873

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Madhotra R, Mulcahy HE, Willner I, Reuben A. Prediction of esophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis. J Clin Gastroenterol;34:81–85

  9. Giannini E, Botta F, Borro P et al (2003) Platelet count/spleen diameter ratio: proposal and validation of a non-invasive parameter to predict the presence of oesophageal varices in patients with liver cirrhosis. Gut 52:1200–1205

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cottone M, D’Amico G, Maringhini A et al (1986) Predictive value of ultrasonography in the screening of non-ascitic cirrhotic patients with large varices. J Ultrasound Med 5:189–192

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Berzigotti A, Rossi V, Tiani C et al (2011) Prognostic value of a single HVPG measurement and Doppler-ultrasound evaluation in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. J Gastroenterol 46:687–695

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sebastiani G, Tempesta D, Fattovich G et al (2010) Prediction of oesophageal varices in hepatic cirrhosis by simple serum non-invasive markers: Results of a multicenter, large-scale study. J Hepatol 53:630–638

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Thabut D, Trabut JB, Massard J et al (2006) Non-invasive diagnosis of large oesophageal varices with FibroTest in patients with cirrhosis: a preliminary retrospective study. Liver Int 26:271–278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Berzigotti A, Gilabert R, Abraldes JG et al (2008) Noninvasive prediction of clinically significant portal hypertension and esophageal varices in patients with compensated liver cirrhosis. Am J Gastroenterol 103:1159–1167

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Castera L, Pinzani M, Bosch J (2012) Non invasive evaluation of portal hypertension using transient elastography. J Hepatol 56:696–703

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Colecchia A, Montrone L, Scaioli E et al (2012) Measurement of spleen stiffness to evaluate portal hypertension and the presence of esophageal varices in patients with HCV-related cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 143:646–654

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Berzigotti A, Seijo S, Arena U et al (2013) Elastography, spleen size, and platelet count identify portal hypertension in patients with compensated cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 144:102–111, e1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sharma P, Kirnake V, Tyagi P et al (2013) Spleen stiffness in patients with cirrhosis in predicting esophageal varices. Am J Gastroenterol 108:1101–1107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Takuma Y, Nouso K, Morimoto Y et al (2013) Measurement of spleen stiffness by acoustic radiation force impulse imaging identifies cirrhotic patients with esophageal varices. Gastroenterology 144:92–101, e2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bavu E, Gennisson JL, Couade M et al (2011) Noninvasive in vivo liver fibrosis evaluation using supersonic shear imaging: a clinical study on 113 hepatitis C virus patients. Ultrasound Med Biol 37:1361–1373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Huwart L, Sempoux C, Vicaut E et al (2008) Magnetic resonance elastography for the noninvasive staging of liver fibrosis. Gastroenterology 135:32–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nedredal GI, Yin M, McKenzie T et al (2011) Portal hypertension correlates with splenic stiffness as measured with MR elastography. J Magn Reson Imaging 34:79–87

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yin M, Kolipaka A, Woodrum DA et al (2013) Hepatic and splenic stiffness augmentation assessed with MR elastography in an in vivo porcine portal hypertension model. J Magn Reson Imaging 38:809–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Talwalkar JA, Yin M, Venkatesh S et al (2009) Feasibility of in vivo MR elastographic splenic stiffness measurements in the assessment of portal hypertension. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:122–127

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yin M, Talwalkar JA, Glaser KJ et al (2011) Dynamic postprandial hepatic stiffness augmentation assessed with MR elastography in patients with chronic liver disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:64–70

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sinkus R, Siegmann K, Xydeas T, Tanter M, Claussen C, Fink M (2007) MR elastography of breast lesions: understanding the solid/liquid duality can improve the specificity of contrast-enhanced MR mammography. Magn Reson Med 58:1135–1144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pugh RN, Murray-Lyon IM, Dawson JL, Pietroni MC, Williams R (1973) Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices. Br J Surg 60:646–649

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wiesner RH, McDiarmid SV, Kamath PS et al (2001) MELD and PELD: application of survival models to liver allocation. Liver Transpl 7:567–580

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Qureshi W, Adler DG, Davila R et al (2005) ASGE Guideline: the role of endoscopy in the management of variceal hemorrhage, updated July 2005. Gastrointest Endosc 62:651–655

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Garteiser P, Sahebjavaher RS, Ter Beek L et al (2013) Rapid acquisition of multifrequency, multislice and multidirectional magnetic resonance elastography data with a fractionally encoded gradient echo sequence. NMR Biomed 26:1326–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Carrion JA, Navasa M, Bosch J, Bruguera M, Gilabert R, Forns X (2006) Transient elastography for diagnosis of advanced fibrosis and portal hypertension in patients with hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 12:1791–1798

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Vizzutti F, Arena U, Romanelli RG et al (2007) Liver stiffness measurement predicts severe portal hypertension in patients with HCV-related cirrhosis. Hepatology 45:1290–1297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hirooka M, Ochi H, Koizumi Y et al (2011) Splenic elasticity measured with real-time tissue elastography is a marker of portal hypertension. Radiology 261:960–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Huwart L, Peeters F, Sinkus R et al (2006) Liver fibrosis: non-invasive assessment with MR elastography. NMR Biomed 19:173–179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Chen S, Sanchez W, Callstrom MR, Gorman B, Lewis JT, Sanderson SO et al (2013) Assessment of liver viscoelasticity by using shear waves induced by ultrasound radiation force. Radiology 266:964–970

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Deffieux T, Gennisson JL, Bercoff J, Tanter M (2011) On the effects of reflected waves in transient shear wave elastography. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 58:2032–2035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Arena U, Platon ML, Stasi C et al (2013) Liver stiffness is influenced by a standardized meal in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus at different stages of fibrotic evolution. Hepatology 58:65–72

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Lucile Dehec, Ariane Metei, Maryse Moinat, Maryvonne Monroty and Irène Rua for their help in identifying the patients.

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Bernard E Van-Beers. The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article. The authors state that this work has not received any funding. No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper. Institutional review board approval was obtained. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects (patients) in this study. Methodology: prospective, diagnostic or prognostic study, performed at one institution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maxime Ronot.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ronot, M., Lambert, S., Elkrief, L. et al. Assessment of portal hypertension and high-risk oesophageal varices with liver and spleen three-dimensional multifrequency MR elastography in liver cirrhosis. Eur Radiol 24, 1394–1402 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3124-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3124-y

Keywords

Navigation