Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Letter to the Editor re: Are intravenous injections of contrast media really less nephrotoxic than intra-arterial injections?

  • Contrast Media
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The Original Article was published on 04 February 2012

Abstract

In a recent paper, the authors oppose the opinion that “ intra-arterial administration of iodinated-based contrast media (CM) appears to pose a greater risk of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) than intravenous administration” . As nephrologists, we are happy to have the opportunity to offer our expertise in the setting of renal disease aimed at optimizing diagnostic algorithm and preventive strategies. Our comment relies on the fact that, from a nephrologist’s point of view, there is no doubt that renal damage following CM intra-venous administration in patients not in intensive care or emergency department and treated with conventional preventive strategies not only occurs with low frequency, but also appears of negligible clinical impact; it is confined to an asymptomatic increase of serum creatinine of 25% or 0.5 mg/dL lacking any prognostic negative impact, and in some case not significantly different from controls.

True CIN, just related to intravenous CM injection for diagnostic purpose, has to be differentiated from all the other cause of renal involvement in people stricken with sudden and acute illness also receiving intra-arterial CM injection, in order to avoid patients being denied necessary radiological examinations due to an inappropriate fear of risk.

Key Points

• Contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) is not any nephropathy following contrast medium(CM).

• CIN should only refer to renal damage strictly due to CM infusion.

• True CIN following CM intravenous infusion is a clinically insignificant event.

• Renal damage following intra-arterial CM infusion in compromised patients is not CIN.

• Patients should not forego necessary radiological examinations for inappropriate understanding about risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  1. Nyman U, Almén T, Jacobsson B, Aspelin P (2012) Are intravenous injections of contrast media really less nephrotoxic than intra-arterial injections? Eur Radiol 22:1366–1371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Katzberg RW, Lamba R (2009) Contrast-induced nephropathy after intravenous administration: fact or fiction? Radiol Clin North Am 47:789–800

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Katzberg RW, Newhouse JH (2010) Intravenous contrast medium-induced nephrotoxicity: is the medical risk really as great as we have come to believe? Radiology 256:21–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Canavese C, Morra F, Morellini V et al (2004) How can we be sure that renal dysfunction after coronary angiography is just explained by contrast nephropathy? Kidney Int 66:1717

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stratta P, Bozzola C, Quaglia M (2012) Pitfall in nephrology: contrast nephropathy has to be differentiated from renal damage due to atheroembolic disease. J Nephrol 25:282–289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vuurmans T, Byrne J, Fretz E et al (2010) Chronic kidney injury in patients after cardiac catheterisation or percutaneous coronary intervention: a comparison of radial and femoral approaches (from the British Columbia Cardiac and Renal Registries). Heart 96:1538–1542

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wu C, Liao D, Dyer AM et al (2011) The transradial approach is associated with lower risk of adverse outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention: a single-center experience. J Invasive Cardiol 23:88–92

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Weisz G, Leon MB (2010) Interventional cardiology: Hand me your radial artery to protect your kidney. Nat Rev Cardiol 7:674–675

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stratta P, Bozzola C, Quaglia M (2012) Could radial instead of femoral access for coronary angiography change renal outcome? Nephrologists call for help. Am Heart J163:e19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Perrin T, Descombes E, Cook S (2012) Contrast-induced nephropathy in invasive cardiology. Swiss Med Wkly 142:w13608

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Balemans CE, Reichert LJ, van Schelven BI, van den Brand JA, Wetzels JF (2012) Epidemiology of contrast material-induced nephropathy in the era of hydration. Radiology 263:706–713

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rashid AH, Brieva JL, Stokes B (2009) Incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy in intensive care patients undergoing computerised tomography and prevalence of risk factors. Anaesth Intensive Care 37:968–975

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bruce RJ, Djamali A, Shinki K et al (2009) Background fluctuation of kidney function versus contrast-induced nephrotoxicity. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:711–718

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Murakami R, Hayashi H, Sugizaki KI et al (2012) Contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with renal insufficiency undergoing contrast-enhanced MDCT. Eur Radiol 22:2147-2152

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cely CM, Schein RM, Quartin AA (2012) Risk of contrast induced nephropathy in the critically ill: a prospective, case matched study. Crit Care 16:R67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Josephson SA, Dillon WP, Smith WS (2005) Incidence of contrast nephropathy from cerebral CT angiography and CT perfusion imaging. Neurology 64:1805–1806

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Asif A, Cherla G, Merrill D et al (2005) Venous mapping using venography and the risk of radiocontrast-induced nephropathy. Semin Dial 18:239–242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ng CS, Shaw AD, Bell CS et al (2010) Effect of IV contrast medium on renal function in oncologic patients undergoing CT in ICU. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:414–422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Langner S, Stumpe S, Kirsch M et al (2008) No increased risk for contrast-induced nephropathy after multiple CT perfusion studies of the brain with a nonionic, dimeric, iso-osmolal contrast medium. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1525-9

  20. Pahade JK, LeBedis CA, Raptopoulos VD et al (2011) Incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing contrast-enhanced CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:1094–1101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lufft V, Hoogestraat-Lufft L, Fels LM et al (2002) Contrast media nephropathy: intravenous CT angiography versus intraarterial digital subtraction angiography in renal artery stenosis: a prospective randomized trial. Am J Kidney Dis 40:236–242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Baumgarten DA, Ellis JH (2008) Contrast-induced nephropathy: contrast material not required? AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:383–386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Murphy SW, Barrett BJ, Parfrey PS (2000) Contrast nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 11:177–182

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Stratta P, Quaglia M, Airoldi A, Aime S (2012) Structure-function relationships of iodinated contrast media and risk of nephrotoxicity. Curr Med Chem 19:736–743

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Nephrology and Transplantation, & International Research Centre Autoimmune Disease (IRCAD), Maggiore Hospital of Novara, Amedeo Avogadro University, Ospedale Maggiore della Carità, Corso Mazzini 18, 28100, Novara, Italy

    Piero Stratta, Cristina Izzo, Caterina Canavese & Marco Quaglia

Authors
  1. Piero Stratta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cristina Izzo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Caterina Canavese
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marco Quaglia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Piero Stratta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stratta, P., Izzo, C., Canavese, C. et al. Letter to the Editor re: Are intravenous injections of contrast media really less nephrotoxic than intra-arterial injections?. Eur Radiol 23, 1260–1263 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2720-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2720-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation