Skip to main content
Log in

Computed tomography- and fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous screw fixation of low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults: a new technique

  • Interventional
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the feasibility of computed tomography (CT)- and fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous screw fixation for the treatment of low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults.

Methods

Ten consecutive adult patients (four men and six women; mean age: 57.1 [range, 44–78 years]) were prospectively treated by percutaneous screw fixation for low-grade (six grade 1 and four grade 2) isthmic spondylolisthesis of L5. For each patient, two 4.0-mm Asnis III cannulated screws were placed to fix the pars interarticularis defects. All procedures were performed under local anaesthesia by using CT and fluoroscopy guidance. Post-operative outcome was assessed using the visual analogue scale and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores.

Results

The procedure time ranged from 45 to 60 min. The mean screw length was 27 mm (range, 24–32 mm). The VAS and ODI measurements ± SD decreased from 7.8 ± 0.9 preoperatively to 1.5 ± 1.1 at the last 2-year follow-up, and from 62.3 ± 17.2 to 15.1 ± 6.0, respectively (P < 0.001 in both cases). Neither slip progression nor screw failure was noted.

Conclusions

This feasibility study showed that CT- and fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous screw fixation could be a rapid, safe and effective method of treating low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Key Points

CT- and fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous screw fixation of isthmic spondylolisthesis is feasible.

It could become an effective method to treat low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Percutaneous trans-isthmic screw fixation can be performed under local anaesthesia.

This new technique can be performed as an outpatient procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Saraste H (1987) Long-term clinical and radiological follow-up of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. J Pediatr Orthop 7:631–638

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fredrickson BE, Baker D, McHolick WJ, Yuan HA, Lubicky JP (1984) The natural history of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66:699–707

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Meyerding HW (1932) Spondylolisthesis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 54:371–377

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bell DF, Ehrlich MG, Zaleske DJ (1988) Brace treatment for symptomatic spondylolisthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 236:192–198

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pizzutillo PD, Hummer CD (1989) Nonoperative treatment for painful adolescent spondylolysis or spondylolisthesis. J Pediatr Orthop 9:538–540

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Agabegi SS, Fischgrund JS (2010) Contemporary management of isthmic spondylolisthesis: pediatric and adult. Spine J 10:530–543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kwon BK, Albert TJ (2005) Adult low-grade acquired spondylolytic spondylolisthesis: evaluation and management. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:S35–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Amoretti N, Hauger O, Marcy PY et al (2010) Foreign body extraction from soft tissue by using CT and fluoroscopic guidance: a new technique. Eur Radiol 20:190–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Amoretti N, Hovorka E, Dausse F et al (2005) Posterior arthrodesis of the spine by percutaneous CT-guided application of screws: preliminary report. Clin Imaging 29:231–234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Amoretti N, Hovorka I, Marcy PY et al (2009) Computed axial tomography-guided fixation of sacroiliac joint disruption: safety, outcomes, and results at 3-year follow-up. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 32:1227–1234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB (2000) The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:2940–2952

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Osterman K, Schlenzka D, Poussa M, Seitsalo S, Virta L (1993) Isthmic spondylolisthesis in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects, epidemiology, and natural history with special reference to disk abnormality and mode of treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 297:65–70

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Moller H, Hedlund R (2000) Surgery versus conservative management in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis—a prospective randomized study: part 1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:1711–1715

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hambly M, Lee CK, Gutteling E, Zimmerman MC, Langrana N, Pyun Y (1989) Tension band wiring-bone grafting for spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. A clinical and biomechanical study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 14:455–460

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Bullis D, Betz RR, Baldus C, Schoenecker PL (1992) Results of in situ fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord 5:433–442

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Schnee CL, Freese A, Ansell LV (1997) Outcome analysis for adults with spondylolisthesis treated with posterolateral fusion and transpedicular screw fixation. J Neurosurg 86:56–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Vaccaro AR, Ring D, Scuderi G, Cohen DS, Garfin SR (1997) Predictors of outcome in patients with chronic back pain and low-grade spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22:2030–2034

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Carragee EJ (1997) Single-level posterolateral arthrodesis, with or without posterior decompression, for the treatment of isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79:1175–1180

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Johnson LP, Nasca RJ, Dunham WK (1988) Surgical management of isthmic spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 13:93–97

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Deguchi M, Rapoff AJ, Zdeblick TA (1998) Posterolateral fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults: analysis of fusion rate and clinical results. J Spinal Disord 11:459–464

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Thomsen K, Christensen FB, Eiskjaer SP, Hansen ES, Fruensgaard S, Bunger CE (1997) 1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. The effect of pedicle screw instrumentation on functional outcome and fusion rates in posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion: a prospective, randomized clinical study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22:2813–2822

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. L’Heureux EA Jr, Perra JH, Pinto MR, Smith MD, Denis F, Lonstein JE (2003) Functional outcome analysis including preoperative and postoperative SF-36 for surgically treated adult isthmic spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:1269–1274

    Google Scholar 

  23. Barrick WT, Schofferman JA, Reynolds JB et al (2000) Anterior lumbar fusion improves discogenic pain at levels of prior posterolateral fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:853–857

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ekman P, Moller H, Tullberg T, Neumann P, Hedlund R (2007) Posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:2178–2183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim KT, Lee SH, Lee YH, Bae SC, Suk KS (2006) Clinical outcomes of 3 fusion methods through the posterior approach in the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:1351–1357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Swan J, Hurwitz E, Malek F et al (2006) Surgical treatment for unstable low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults: a prospective controlled study of posterior instrumented fusion compared with combined anterior-posterior fusion. Spine J 6:606–614

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Foley KT, Holly LT, Schwender JD (2003) Minimally invasive lumbar fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:S26–35

    Google Scholar 

  28. Buck JE (1970) Direct repair of the defect in spondylolisthesis. Preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Br 52:432–437

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Deguchi M, Rapoff AJ, Zdeblick TA (1999) Biomechanical comparison of spondylolysis fixation techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:328–333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Gillet P, Petit M (1999) Direct repair of spondylolysis without spondylolisthesis, using a rod-screw construct and bone grafting of the pars defect. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:1252–1256

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kakiuchi M (1997) Repair of the defect in spondylolysis. Durable fixation with pedicle screws and laminar hooks. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79:818–825

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Gangi A, Kastler BA, Dietemann JL (1994) Percutaneous vertebroplasty guided by a combination of CT and fluoroscopy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 15:83–86

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Monticelli G, Ascani E (1975) Spondylolysis and spondylolysthesis. Acta Orthop Scand 46:498–506

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Wiltse LL, Jackson DW (1976) Treatment of spondylolisthesis and spondylolysis in children. Clin Orthop Relat Res 117:92–100

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolas Amoretti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Amoretti, N., Huwart, L., Hauger, O. et al. Computed tomography- and fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous screw fixation of low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults: a new technique. Eur Radiol 22, 2841–2847 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2536-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2536-9

Keywords

Navigation