Skip to main content
Log in

Description and validation of a scoring system for tomosynthesis in pulmonary cystic fibrosis

  • Chest
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To design and validate a scoring system for tomosynthesis (digital tomography) in pulmonary cystic fibrosis.

Methods

A scoring system dedicated to tomosynthesis in pulmonary cystic fibrosis was designed. Three radiologists independently scored 88 pairs of radiographs and tomosynthesis examinations of the chest in 60 patients with cystic fibrosis and 7 oncology patients. Radiographs were scored according to the Brasfield scoring system and tomosynthesis examinations were scored using the new scoring system.

Results

Observer agreements for the tomosynthesis score were almost perfect for the total score with square-weighted kappa >0.90, and generally substantial to almost perfect for subscores. Correlation between the tomosynthesis score and the Brasfield score was good for the three observers (Kendall’s rank correlation tau 0.68, 0.77 and 0.78). Tomosynthesis was generally scored higher as a percentage of the maximum score. Observer agreements for the total score for Brasfield score were almost perfect (square-weighted kappa 0.80, 0.81 and 0.85).

Conclusions

The tomosynthesis scoring system seems robust and correlates well with the Brasfield score. Compared with radiography, tomosynthesis is more sensitive to cystic fibrosis changes, especially bronchiectasis and mucus plugging, and the new tomosynthesis scoring system offers the possibility of more detailed and accurate scoring of disease severity.

Key Points

Tomosynthesis is more sensitive than conventional radiography for pulmonary cystic fibrosis changes.

The radiation dose from chest tomosynthesis is low compared with computed tomography.

Tomosynthesis may become useful in the regular follow-up of patients with cystic fibrosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vikgren J, Zachrisson S, Svalkvist A et al (2008) Comparison of chest tomosynthesis and chest radiography for detection of pulmonary nodules: human observer study of clinical cases. Radiology 249:1034–1041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Vult von Steyern K, Bjorkman-Burtscher I, Geijer M (2011) Tomosynthesis in pulmonary cystic fibrosis with comparison to radiography and computed tomography: a pictorial review. Insights Imaging. doi:10.1007/s13244-011-0137-9

  3. Shwachman H, Kulczycki L (1958) Long-term study of one hundred five patients with cystic fibrosis: studies made over a five- to fourteen-year period. AMA J Dis Child 96:6–15

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Taussig L, Kattwinkel J, Friedewald W et al (1973) A new prognostic score and clinical evaluation system for cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr 82:380–390

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chrispin A, Norman A (1974) The systematic evaluation of the chest radiograph in cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Radiol 2:101–105

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Brasfield D, Hicks G, Soong S et al (1979) The chest roentgenogram in cystic fibrosis: a new scoring system. Pediatrics 63:24–29

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Van der Put J, Meradji M, Danoesastro D et al (1982) Chest radiographs in cystic fibrosis. A follow-up study with application of a quantitative system. Pediatr Radiol 12:57–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Carty H (1987) The chest radiograph in cystic fibrosis in children and the role of other radiological techniques. J R Soc Med 80:38–46

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Weatherly M, Palmer C, Peters M et al (1993) Wisconsin cystic fibrosis chest radiograph scoring system. Pediatrics 91:488–495

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Conway S, Pond M, Bowler I et al (1994) The chest radiograph in cystic fibrosis: a new scoring system compared with the Chrispin-Norman and Brasfield scores. Thorax 49:860–862

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cleveland R, Neish A, Zurakowski D et al (1998) Cystic fibrosis: a system for assessing and predicting progression. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170:1067–1072

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Koscik R, Kosorok M, Farrell P et al (2000) Wisconsin cystic fibrosis chest radiograph scoring system: validation and standardization for application to longitudinal studies. Pediatr Pulmonol 29:457–467

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Benden C, Wallis C, Owens C et al (2005) The Chrispin-Norman score in cystic fibrosis: doing away with the lateral view. Eur Respir J 26:894–897

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bhalla M, Turcios N, Aponte V et al (1991) Cystic fibrosis: scoring system with thin-section CT. Radiology 179:783–788

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nathanson I, Conboy K, Murphy S et al (1991) Ultrafast computerized tomography of the chest in cystic fibrosis: a new scoring system. Pediatr Pulmonol 11:81–86

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Maffessanti M, Candusso M, Brizzi F et al (1996) Cystic fibrosis in children: HRCT findings and distribution of disease. J Thorac Imaging 11:27–38

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Santamaria F, Grillo G, Guidi G et al (1998) Cystic fibrosis: when should high-resolution computed tomography of the chest be obtained? Pediatrics 101:908–913

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Brody A, Molina P, Klein J et al (1999) High-resolution computed tomography of the chest in children with cystic fibrosis: support for use as an outcome surrogate. Pediatr Radiol 29:731–735

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Helbich T, Heinz-Peer G, Eichler I et al (1999) Cystic fibrosis: CT assessment of lung involvement in children and adults. Radiology 213:537–544

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Robinson T, Leung A, Northway W et al (2001) Spirometer-triggered high-resolution computed tomography and pulmonary function measurements during an acute exacerbation in patients with cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr 138:553–559

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Oikonomou A, Tsanakas J, Hatziagorou E et al (2008) High resolution computed tomography of the chest in cystic fibrosis (CF): is simplification of scoring systems feasible? Eur Radiol 18:538–547

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Brody A, Klein J, Molina P et al (2004) High-resolution computed tomography in young patients with cystic fibrosis: distribution of abnormalities and correlation with pulmonary function tests. J Pediatr 145:32–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dobbins J, Godfrey D (2003) Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential. Phys Med Biol 48:R65–R106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bath M, Svalkvist A, von Wrangel A et al (2010) Effective dose to patients from chest examinations with tomosynthesis. Radiat Prot Dosim 139:153–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sabol JM (2009) A Monte Carlo estimation of effective dose in chest tomosynthesis. Med Phys 36:5480–5487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Reid L (1950) Reduction in bronchial subdivision in bronchiectasis. Thorax 5:233–247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lynch D, Newell J, Hale V et al (1999) Correlation of CT findings with clinical evaluations in 261 patients with symptomatic bronchiectasis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173:53–58

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Barker A (2002) Bronchiectasis. N Engl J Med 346:1383–1393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rossi S, Franquet T, Volpacchio M et al (2005) Tree-in-bud pattern at thin-section CT of the lungs: radiologic-pathologic overview1. Radiographics 25:789–801

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Eisenhuber E (2002) The tree-in-bud sign. Radiology 222:771–772

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Svensson E, Holm S (1994) Separation of systematic and random differences in ordinal rating scales. Stat Med 13:2437–2453

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Svensson E, Starmark JE, Ekholm S et al (1996) Analysis of interobserver disagreement in the assessment of subarachnoid blood and acute hydrocephalus on CT scans. Neurol Res 18:487–494

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. de Jong P, Lindblad A, Rubin L et al (2006) Progression of lung disease on computed tomography and pulmonary function tests in children and adults with cystic fibrosis. Thorax 61:80–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. de Jong P, Tiddens H (2007) Cystic fibrosis specific computed tomography scoring. Proc Am Thorac Soc 4:338–342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare (Socialstyrelsen) (2010) Ovanliga diagnoser, cystisk fibros. http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/ovanligadiagnoser/cystiskfibros. Accessed 15 June 2010

  37. Aziz Z, Davies J, Alton E et al (2007) Computed tomography and cystic fibrosis: promises and problems. Thorax 62:181–186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Cooper P, MacLean J (2006) High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) should not be considered as a routine assessment method in cystic fibrosis lung disease. Paediatr Respir Rev 7:197–201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Tiddens H (2006) Chest computed tomography scans should be considered as a routine investigation in cystic fibrosis. Paediatr Respir Rev 7:202–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. de Jong P, Nakano Y, Lequin M et al (2004) Progressive damage on high resolution computed tomography despite stable lung function in cystic fibrosis. Eur Respir J 23:93–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Lucaya J, Piqueras J, Garcia-Pena P et al (2000) Low-dose high-resolution CT of the chest in children and young adults: dose, cooperation, artifact incidence, and image quality. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:985–992

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Pär Wingren for his assistance in the development of the tomosynthesis scoring system, and Carina Fyledahl-Kastberg for invaluable help in performing the tomosynthesis examinations and keeping the patient log.

A scientific paper abstract with the title “A scoring system for tomosynthesis in pulmonary cystic fibrosis” was presented at ECR 2012 as an oral presentation (poster number: B-0417).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristina Vult von Steyern.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 5.02 mb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vult von Steyern, K., Björkman-Burtscher, I.M., Höglund, P. et al. Description and validation of a scoring system for tomosynthesis in pulmonary cystic fibrosis. Eur Radiol 22, 2718–2728 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2534-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2534-y

Keywords

Navigation