Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prediction of the histopathological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma using qualitative diffusion-weighted, dynamic, and hepatobiliary phase MRI

  • Hepatobiliary-Pancreas
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate the effectiveness of qualitative diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), subtraction of unenhanced from arterial phase images, and hepatobiliary phase (HBP) images in estimating the histopathological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed gadoxetic acid–enhanced magnetic resonance images of 175 patients with 201 surgically resected HCCs. The signal intensity and its relationship with histopathological grade were assessed for each sequence and a combination of sequences.

Results

There was a tendency towards higher grades in tumours showing restricted diffusion on DWI (P < 0.001) or arterial enhancement on subtraction imaging (P <0.001), but not hepatocyte-defect on HBP images (P = 0.33). When lesions were divided into three groups based on combined findings on DWI and subtraction imaging, a linear trend was observed between group and grade (P < 0.001). The positive predictive value (PPV) of the combination of no restricted diffusion and no arterial enhancement in predicting well-differentiated HCC was 100%, higher than the PPV of individual findings on DWI (74%) or subtraction imaging (81%).

Conclusions

DWI and subtraction imaging are helpful for predicting the histopathological grade of HCC, especially when the two sequences are considered together.

Key Points

• Predicting the histopathological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) preoperatively is important.

• Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and subtraction imaging are recently developed MR techniques.

• Retrospective study showed DWI and subtraction imaging helps predict HCC grades.

• Management of patients with HCC becomes more appropriate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jonas S, Bechstein WO, Steinmuller T et al (2001) Vascular invasion and histopathologic grading determine outcome after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis. Hepatology 33:1080–1086

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ker CG, Chen HY, Chen KS et al (2003) Clinical significance of cell differentiation in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology 50:475–479

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ariizumi S, Takasaki K, Yamamoto M, Ohtsubo T, Katsuragawa H, Katagiri S (2004) Histopathologic differentiation of the main nodule determines outcome after hepatic resection for synchronous multicentric hepatocellular carcinomas. Hepatogastroenterology 51:500–504

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Prez-Saborido B, de los Galanes SJ, Menu-Daz JC et al (2007) Tumor recurrence after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: recurrence pathway and prognostic factors. Transplant Proc 39:2304–2307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Haratake J, Takeda S, Kasai T, Nakano S, Tokui N (1993) Predictable factors for estimating prognosis of patients after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer 72:1178–1183

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Okusaka T, Okada S, Ueno H et al (2002) Satellite lesions in patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma with reference to clinicopathologic features. Cancer 95:1931–1937

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Oishi K, Itamoto T, Amano H et al (2007) Clinicopathologic features of poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 95:311–316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kogita S, Imai Y, Okada M et al Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance images of hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation with histological grading and portal blood flow. Eur Radiol 20:2405-2413

  9. Nishie A, Tajima T, Asayama Y et al (2010) Diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient for predicting histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Radiol 80:e29–e33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nasu K, Kuroki Y, Tsukamoto T, Nakajima H, Mori K, Minami M (2009) Diffusion-weighted imaging of surgically resected hepatocellular carcinoma: imaging characteristics and relationship among signal intensity, apparent diffusion coefficient, and histopathologic grade. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:438–444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Heo SH, Jeong YY, Shin SS et al (2010) Apparent diffusion coefficient value of diffusion-weighted imaging for hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation with the histologic differentiation and the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor. Korean J Radiol 11:295–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A (2009) AJCC cancer staging manual, 7th edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mazzaferro V, Regalia E, Doci R et al (1996) Liver transplantation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis. N Engl J Med 334:693–699

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Muhi A, Ichikawa T, Motosugi U et al (2009) High-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging of hepatocellular lesions: estimation of grade of malignancy of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Magn Reson Imaging 30:1005–1011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yu JS, Kim YH, Rofsky NM (2005) Dynamic subtraction magnetic resonance imaging of cirrhotic liver: assessment of high signal intensity lesions on nonenhanced T1-weighted images. J Comput Assist Tomogr 29:51–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Secil M, Obuz F, Altay C et al (2008) The role of dynamic subtraction MRI in detection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Diagn Interv Radiol 14:200–204

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Asayama Y, Yoshimitsu K, Nishihara Y et al (2008) Arterial blood supply of hepatocellular carcinoma and histologic grading: radiologic-pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:W28–W34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Narita M, Hatano E, Arizono S et al (2009) Expression of OATP1B3 determines uptake of Gd-EOB-DTPA in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol 44:793–798

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mi-Suk Park.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

An, C., Park, MS., Jeon, HM. et al. Prediction of the histopathological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma using qualitative diffusion-weighted, dynamic, and hepatobiliary phase MRI. Eur Radiol 22, 1701–1708 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2421-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2421-6

Keywords

Navigation