Skip to main content
Log in

Improvement of MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) images after black tea consumption

  • Magnetic Resonance
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Evaluation of the efficacy of black tea as the negative oral contrast agent in MRCP.

Materials and methods

MRCP was performed before and 5 and 15 min after tea consumption for 35 patients. Depiction of the gall bladder (GB), cystic duct (CD), proximal and distal parts of the common bile duct (CBD), intrahepatic ducts (IHD), ampulla of vater (AV), main pancreatic duct (MPD) and signal loss of stomach and three different segments of the duodenum were investigated according to VAS and Likert scores.

Results

Twenty-one of the patients (60%) were female (mean age, 50.3 ± 19.2 years). Regarding visibility of different anatomical parts of the pancreatobiliary tree, the post procedure images were better visualized in the distal part of CBD, AV and MPD in Likert and VAS scoring (all P ≤ 0.001). Regarding obliteration of high signal in the stomach and three different parts of the duodenum, all post procedure images showed significant disappearance of high signal in Likert and VAS scoring systems (all Ps ≤ 0.001).

Conclusion

Black tea is a simple and safe negative oral contrast agent which reduces the signal intensity of gastrointestinal tract fluid and provides improved depiction of the MPD, the distal CBD and the ampulla during MRCP.

Key Points

Tea is an effective negative oral contrast agent for gastrointestinal MRI

Ingestion of black tea improves conspicuity of the distal CBD in MRCP

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pilleul F, Courbière M, Henry L et al (2004) La cholangio-IRM dans le diagnostic étiologique des stenosis biliaires: corrélation anatomopathologique. J Radiol 85:25–30

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hoeffel C, Azizi L, Lewin M et al (2006) Normal and pathologic features of the postoperative biliary tract at 3D MR cholangiopancreatography and MR imaging. Radiographics 26:1603–1620

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yu J, Turner MA, Fulcher AS et al (2006) Congenital anomalies and normal variants of the pancreaticobiliary tract and the pancreas in adults: part 1, biliary tract. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:1536–1543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yu J, Turner MA, Fulcher AS et al (2006) Congenital anomalies and normal variants of the pancreaticobiliary tract and the pancreas in adults: part 2, pancreatic duct and pancreas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:1544–1553

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Arrivé L, Coudray C, Azizi L et al (2007) Pineapple juice as a negative oral contrast agent in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. J Radiol 88(11 Pt 1):1689–1694

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Coppens E, Metens T, Winant C et al (2005) Pineapple juice labeled with gadolinium: a convenient oral contrast for magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Eur Radiol 15:2122–2129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Matos C, Metens T, Devière J et al (1997) Pancreatic duct: morphologic and functional evaluation with dynamic MR pancreatography after secretin stimulation. Radiology 203:435–441

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hirohashi S, Hirohashi R, Uchida H et al (1997) MR cholangiopancreatography and MR urography: improved enhancement with a negative oral contrast agent. Radiology 203:281–285

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bernardino MR, Weinreb JC, Mitchell DG et al (1994) Safety and optimum concen- tration of a manganese chloride based oral MR contrast agent. J Magn Res Imag 4:872–876

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Schreiber WE (1989) Iron, porphyrin and bilirubin metabolism. In: Kaplan LA, Pesce AJ (eds) Clinical chemistry: theory, analysis. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 496–511

    Google Scholar 

  11. Varavithya V, Phongkitkarun S, Jatchavala J et al (2005) The efficacy of roselle (Hibicus sabdariffa Linn.) flower tea as oral negative contrast agent for MRCP study. J Med Assoc Thai 88(Suppl 1):S35–S41

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Weisburger JH (1997) Tea and health: a historical perspective. Cancer Lett 114:315–317

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wróbel K, Wróbel K, Urbina EM (2000) Determination of total aluminum, chromium, copper, iron, manganese, and nickel and their fractions leached to the infusions of black tea, green tea, Hibiscus sabdariffa, and Ilex paraguariensis (mate) by ETA-AAS. Biol Trace Elem Res 78:271–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kato J, Kawamura Y, Watanabe T et al (2001) Examination of intra-gastrointestinal tract signal elimination in MRCP: combined use of T(1)-shortening positive contrast agent and single-shot fast inversion recovery. J Magn Reson Imaging 13:738–743

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wewers ME, Lowe NK (1990) A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Res Nurs Heal 13:227–236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Riordan RD, Khonsari M, Jeffries J et al (2004) Pineapple juice as a negative oral contrast agent in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a preliminary evaluation. Br J Radiol 77:991–999

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim YK, Kim CS, Lee JM et al (2006) Value of adding T1-weighted image to MR cholangiopancreatography for detecting intrahepatic biliary stones. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:W267–W274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Broglia L, Tortora A, Maccioni F et al (1999) Optimization of dosage and exam technique in the use of oral contrast media in magneticresonance. Radiol Med 97:365–370

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Papanikolaou N, Karantanas A, Maris T et al (2000) MR cholangiopancreatography before and after oral blueberry juice administration. J Comput Assist Tomogr 24:229–234

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Chan JH, Tsui EY, Yuen MK et al (2000) Gadopentetate dimeglumine as an oral negative gastrointestinal contrast agent for MRCP. Abdom Imaging 5:05–08

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kavous Firouznia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ghanaati, H., Rokni-Yazdi, H., Jalali, A.H. et al. Improvement of MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) images after black tea consumption. Eur Radiol 21, 2551–2557 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2217-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2217-0

Keywords

Navigation