Abstract
Objective
To evaluate the value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI)-assessed left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in differentiating between hypertensive heart disease and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).
Methods
95 unselected subjects with mild-to-moderate hypertension, 24 patients with HCM attributable to the D175N mutation of the α-tropomyosin gene and 17 control subjects were studied by cine CMRI. Left ventricular (LV) quantitative and qualitative characteristics were evaluated.
Results
LV maximal end-diastolic wall thickness, wall thickness-to-LV volume ratio, end-diastolic septum thickness and septum-to-lateral wall thickness ratio were useful measures for differentiating between LVH due to hypertension and HCM. The most accurate measure for identifying patients with HCM was the LV maximal wall thickness ≥17 mm, with a sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, and accuracy of 90%, 93%, 86%, 95% and 91%, respectively. LV maximal wall thickness in the anterior wall, or regional bulging in left ventricular wall was found only in patients with HCM. LV mass index was not discriminant between patients with HCM and those with LVH due to hypertension.
Conclusion
LV maximal thickness measured by CMRI is the best anatomical parameter in differentiating between LVH due to mild-to-moderate hypertension and HCM attributable to a sarcomeric mutation. CMRI assessment of location and quality of LVH is also of value in differential diagnosis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Verdecchia P, Carini G, Circo A et al (2001) Left ventricular mass and cardiovascular morbidity in essential hypertension: the MAVI study. J Am Coll Cardiol 38:1829–1835
Gardin JM, Lauer MS (2004) Left ventricular hypertrophy: the next treatable, silent killer? JAMA 292:2396–2398
Elliott P, McKenna WJ (2004) Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Lancet 363:1881–1891
Belenkov Y, Vikhert OA, Belichenko OI, Arabidze GG (1992) Magnetic resonance imaging of cardiac hypertrophy in malignant arterial hypertension. Am J Hypertens 5:195S–199S
Keller H, Wanger KC, Goepfrich M, Stegaru B, Buss J, Heene DL (1990) Morphological quantification and differentiation of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and hypertensive heart disease. A two dimensional echocardiographic study. Eur Heart J 11:65–74
Afonso LC, Bernal J, Bax JJ, Abraham TP (2008) Echocardiography in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: the role of conventional and emerging technologies. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 1:787–800
Sparrow P, Merchant N, Provost Y, Doyle D, Nguyen E, Paul N (2009) Cardiac MRI and CT features of inheritable and congenital conditions associated with sudden cardiac death. Eur Radiol 19:259–270
Wagner S, Auffermann W, Buser P, Semelka RC, Higgins CB (1991) Functional description of the left ventricle in patients with volume overload, pressure overload, and myocardial disease using cine magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Card Imaging 5:87–97
Petersen SE, Selvanayagam JB, Francis JM et al (2005) Differentiation of athlete’s heart from pathological forms of cardiac hypertrophy by means of geometric indices derived from cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 7:551–558
Puntmann VO, Jahnke C, Gebker R et al (2010) Usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging to distinguish hypertensive and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 106:1016–1022
Thierfelder L, Watkins H, MacRae C et al (1994) α-tropomyosin and cardiac troponin T mutations cause familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a disease of the sarcomere. Cell 77:701–712
Jääskeläinen P, Miettinen R, Kärkkäinen P, Toivonen L, Laakso M, Kuusisto J (2004) Genetics of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in eastern Finland: few founder mutations with benign or intermediary phenotypes. Ann Med 36:23–32
Bos JM, Towbin JA, Ackerman MJ (2009) Diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications of genetic testing for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 54:201–211
Mancia G, De Backer G, Dominiczak A et al (2007) 2007 Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the task force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 28:1462–1536
Vottonen P, Husso M, Sipola P, Vanninen R, Peuhkurinen K, Magga J (2007) Electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy has low diagnostic accuracy in middle-aged subjects. Blood Press 16:328–334
Schiller NB, Shah PM, Crawford M et al (1989) Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2:358–367
Sipola P, Lauerma K, Jaaskelainen P et al (2005) Cine MR imaging of myocardial contractile impairment in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy attributable to Asp175Asn mutation in the alpha-tropomyosin gene. Radiology 236:815–824
McKenna WJ, Spirito P, Desnos M, Dubourg O, Komajda M (1997) Experience from clinical genetics in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: proposal for new diagnostic criteria in adult members of affected families. Heart 77:130–132
Dulce MC, Mostbeck GH, Friese KK, Caputo GR, Higgins CB (1993) Quantification of the left ventricular volumes and function with cine MR imaging: comparison of geometric models with three-dimensional data. Radiology 188:371–376
Mosteller RD (1987) Simplified calculation of body-surface area. N Engl J Med 317:1098
Salton CJ, Chuang ML, O’Donnell CJ et al (2002) Gender differences and normal left ventricular anatomy in an adult population free of hypertension. A cardiovascular magnetic resonance study of the Framingham Heart Study Offspring cohort. J Am Coll Cardiol 39:1055–1060
Rickers C, Wilke NM, Jerosch-Herold M et al (2005) Utility of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circulation 112:855–861
Olivotto I, Maron MS, Autore C et al (2008) Assessment and significance of left ventricular mass by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:559–566
Marian AJ, Roberts R (2001) The molecular genetic basis for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Mol Cell Cardiol 33:655–670
Bashyam MD, Savithri GR, Kumar MS, Narasimhan C, Nallari P (2003) Molecular genetics of familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (FHC). J Hum Genet 48:55–64
Strijack B, Ariyarajah V, Soni R et al (2008) Late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance in genotyped hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with normal phenotype. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 10:58
Maron MS, Maron BJ, Harrigan C et al (2009) Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy phenotype revisited after 50 years with cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol 54:220–228
Grothues F, Smith GC, Moon JC et al (2002) Comparison of interstudy reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance with two-dimensional echocardiography in normal subjects and in patients with heart failure or left ventricular hypertrophy. Am J Cardiol 90:29–34
Germans T, Russel IK, Gotte MJ, et al (2010) How do hypertrophic cardiomyopathy mutations affect myocardial function in carriers with normal wall thickness? Assessment with cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 12:13
Rudolph A, Abdel-Aty H, Bohl S et al (2009) Noninvasive detection of fibrosis applying contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance in different forms of left ventricular hypertrophy: Relation to remodeling. J Am Coll Cardiol 53:284–291
Acknowledgement
This study was supported by the Academy of Finland and the Finnish Heart Research Foundation (grants to Johanna Kuusisto).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sipola, P., Magga, J., Husso, M. et al. Cardiac MRI assessed left ventricular hypertrophy in differentiating hypertensive heart disease from hypertrophic cardiomyopathy attributable to a sarcomeric gene mutation. Eur Radiol 21, 1383–1389 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2065-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2065-y